Files
modelcontextprotocol--pytho…/docs/servers/prompts.md
T
wehub-resource-sync 49b9bb6724
Deploy Docs / deploy-docs (push) Failing after 1s
Conformance Tests / client-conformance (push) Failing after 3s
Conformance Tests / server-conformance (push) Failing after 1s
GitHub Actions Security Analysis / zizmor (push) Failing after 1s
CI / checks (push) Failing after 59m20s
CI / all-green (push) Waiting to run
chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
2026-07-13 12:10:27 +08:00

151 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown

# Prompts
A **prompt** is a message template the user picks.
Tools are for the model. A prompt is the opposite: the user chooses one from a menu in their client (a slash command, a button), fills in its arguments, and the rendered messages go into the conversation as if they had typed them.
You declare one by putting `@mcp.prompt()` on a function that returns the text.
## Your first prompt
```python title="server.py" hl_lines="6-9"
--8<-- "docs_src/prompts/tutorial001.py"
```
The SDK reads the same three things it reads from a tool:
* The **name** is the function name: `review_code`.
* The **description** the client shows is the docstring: `Review a piece of code.`
* The **arguments** come from the parameters. `code` has no default, so it's required.
That is what a client gets back from `prompts/list`:
```json
{
"name": "review_code",
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"arguments": [
{"name": "code", "required": true}
]
}
```
There is no JSON Schema here. Prompt arguments are a flat list of **named string values**: a form a person fills in, not a payload a model constructs.
### Rendering it
The client renders the template with `prompts/get`, passing the arguments. Your function runs and the `str` you return becomes **one user message**:
```json
{
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "Please review this code:\n\ndef add(a, b): return a + b"
}
}
],
"resultType": "complete"
}
```
That is the entire life of a prompt: listed by name, rendered on demand, dropped into the chat.
!!! check
`required` is enforced before your function runs. Render `review_code` without `code` and the
request itself fails with a JSON-RPC error (code `-32603`):
```text
mcp.shared.exceptions.MCPError: Internal server error
```
There is no tool-style error result to hand back to a model, because no model is in the loop:
the call raises. The reason (`Missing required arguments: {'code'}`) lands in your server's log.
### Try it
Run the server with the MCP Inspector:
```console
uv run mcp dev server.py
```
Open the **Prompts** tab and select `review_code`. The Inspector draws a form with one required `code` field. Fill it in, render it, and you get back exactly the user message above.
## More than one message
A code review is one message. A debugging session is a conversation, and a prompt can seed the whole thing.
Return a list of messages instead of a `str`:
```python title="server.py" hl_lines="2 13-20"
--8<-- "docs_src/prompts/tutorial002.py"
```
* `UserMessage` and `AssistantMessage` come from `mcp.server.mcpserver.prompts.base`. Hand them a `str` and they wrap it in `TextContent` for you. The role is the class name.
* `Message` is their common base. Use it as the return annotation.
Rendering `debug_error` now produces three messages, in order:
```json
{
"description": "Start a debugging conversation.",
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": {"type": "text", "text": "I'm seeing this error:"}},
{"role": "user", "content": {"type": "text", "text": "TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable"}},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": {"type": "text", "text": "I'll help debug that. What have you tried so far?"}
}
],
"resultType": "complete"
}
```
Notice the last one. Pre-filling an `assistant` turn is how you steer the model's *next* reply without making the user type the steering themselves.
## Titles and argument descriptions
`review_code` is a function name, not a label. Give the client something better to put on the button, and describe each argument so the form explains itself:
```python title="server.py" hl_lines="10-13"
--8<-- "docs_src/prompts/tutorial003.py"
```
* `title="Code review"` is the human-readable name, exactly like a tool's `title`.
* `Annotated[str, Field(description=...)]` is the same pattern **[Tools](tools.md)** uses to describe a tool's parameters. Here the description lands on the argument instead of in a schema.
* `language` has a default, so it stops being required.
The `prompts/list` entry now carries everything a client needs to draw a good form:
```json
{
"name": "review_code",
"title": "Code review",
"description": "Review a piece of code.",
"arguments": [
{"name": "code", "description": "The code to review.", "required": true},
{"name": "language", "description": "The language the code is written in.", "required": false}
]
}
```
!!! info
If you have read **[Tools](tools.md)**, you already know everything on this page. Same decorator, same
docstring-as-description, same `Annotated`/`Field`. The only things that change are who
triggers it (the user) and where the result goes (into the conversation).
## Recap
* `@mcp.prompt()` on a function makes it a prompt. Name from the function, description from the docstring.
* Prompts are **user-controlled**: the client lists them, the user picks one and fills in the arguments.
* Arguments are a flat list of named strings (no schema). A parameter with a default is optional.
* Return a `str` and it becomes one user message. Return a list of `UserMessage` / `AssistantMessage` to seed a multi-turn conversation.
* `title=` and `Field(description=...)` are what a client puts in its UI.
* A missing required argument fails the whole request. There is no per-prompt error result.
Server-side autocomplete for a prompt's (or a resource template's) arguments is **[Completions](completions.md)**.