3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
Reference Synthesis
Skill: yao-meta-skill
- Description: Create, refactor, evaluate, and package agent skills from workflows, prompts, transcripts, docs, or notes. Use when asked to create a skill, turn a repeated process into a reusable skill, improve an existing skill, add evals, or package a skill for team reuse.
- Intent confidence:
30/100(low)
Live GitHub Benchmarks
- No live GitHub benchmarks are attached yet.
Curated World-Class Pattern Tracks
Official workflow product ergonomics
- Type:
official - Evidence mode:
curated-pattern-track - Why relevant: This track matches: workflow.
- Borrow: Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure.
- Avoid: Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity.
Hypothesis-test-learn loop
- Type:
research - Evidence mode:
curated-pattern-track - Why relevant: This track matches: general fit.
- Borrow: Borrow a small hypothesis-test-learn loop so the first revision is evidence-backed.
- Avoid: Do not create experimental overhead that exceeds the skill's real risk tier.
Boundary-first design
- Type:
principles - Evidence mode:
curated-pattern-track - Why relevant: This track matches: general fit.
- Borrow: Borrow the discipline of defining what the skill should not own before growing the package.
- Avoid: Do not expand execution assets until route boundaries stay clean.
Borrow Now
- Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure.
- Borrow a small hypothesis-test-learn loop so the first revision is evidence-backed.
- Borrow the discipline of defining what the skill should not own before growing the package.
Avoid Now
- Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity.
- Do not create experimental overhead that exceeds the skill's real risk tier.
- Do not expand execution assets until route boundaries stay clean.
Default Recommendation
- Summary: Start by borrowing this pattern: Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure. Avoid this for the first pass: Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity.
- Why: Intent still has gaps, so the system should surface the recommendation and ask for correction before deepening the package.
- User decision required:
True
Visibility Mode
- Mode:
explicit - Reasons: intent_uncertain
- User note: Surface the recommendation because intent is still settling or there is a real design conflict that needs a user call.
- Reviewer note: Keep the full benchmark and synthesis evidence visible for authors and reviewers.
Conflict Check
- No material design conflict detected. Keep the synthesis silent for the user.
Quality Lift Thesis
- Use GitHub repositories for concrete package and workflow patterns.
- Use curated official or commercial tracks for entrypoint and operator ergonomics.
- Use research tracks to justify the smallest evaluation loop that still catches regressions.
- Use principle tracks to keep the package small, boundary-aware, and outcome-driven.
Decision Prompt
Use the recommendation by default. Only surface the underlying benchmark tradeoffs when intent is uncertain or a real design conflict needs a deliberate call.