# Reference Synthesis Skill: `yao-meta-skill` - Description: Create, refactor, evaluate, and package agent skills from workflows, prompts, transcripts, docs, or notes. Use when asked to create a skill, turn a repeated process into a reusable skill, improve an existing skill, add evals, or package a skill for team reuse. - Intent confidence: `30/100` (`low`) ## Live GitHub Benchmarks - No live GitHub benchmarks are attached yet. ## Curated World-Class Pattern Tracks ### Official workflow product ergonomics - Type: `official` - Evidence mode: `curated-pattern-track` - Why relevant: This track matches: workflow. - Borrow: Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure. - Avoid: Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity. ### Hypothesis-test-learn loop - Type: `research` - Evidence mode: `curated-pattern-track` - Why relevant: This track matches: general fit. - Borrow: Borrow a small hypothesis-test-learn loop so the first revision is evidence-backed. - Avoid: Do not create experimental overhead that exceeds the skill's real risk tier. ### Boundary-first design - Type: `principles` - Evidence mode: `curated-pattern-track` - Why relevant: This track matches: general fit. - Borrow: Borrow the discipline of defining what the skill should not own before growing the package. - Avoid: Do not expand execution assets until route boundaries stay clean. ## Borrow Now - Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure. - Borrow a small hypothesis-test-learn loop so the first revision is evidence-backed. - Borrow the discipline of defining what the skill should not own before growing the package. ## Avoid Now - Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity. - Do not create experimental overhead that exceeds the skill's real risk tier. - Do not expand execution assets until route boundaries stay clean. ## Default Recommendation - Summary: Start by borrowing this pattern: Borrow a first-time operator flow that explains itself before it asks for more structure. Avoid this for the first pass: Do not mimic product polish that adds UI bulk without improving clarity. - Why: Intent still has gaps, so the system should surface the recommendation and ask for correction before deepening the package. - User decision required: `True` ## Visibility Mode - Mode: `explicit` - Reasons: intent_uncertain - User note: Surface the recommendation because intent is still settling or there is a real design conflict that needs a user call. - Reviewer note: Keep the full benchmark and synthesis evidence visible for authors and reviewers. ## Conflict Check - No material design conflict detected. Keep the synthesis silent for the user. ## Quality Lift Thesis - Use GitHub repositories for concrete package and workflow patterns. - Use curated official or commercial tracks for entrypoint and operator ergonomics. - Use research tracks to justify the smallest evaluation loop that still catches regressions. - Use principle tracks to keep the package small, boundary-aware, and outcome-driven. ## Decision Prompt Use the recommendation by default. Only surface the underlying benchmark tradeoffs when intent is uncertain or a real design conflict needs a deliberate call.