diff --git a/README.en.md b/README.en.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..75179e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.en.md
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+
+ 
+
+
+Cheat on Content
+
+
+ English
+ ·
+ 简体中文
+
+
+
+
+ 
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+For content creators — a skill that turns every post into a calibrated experiment.
+
+
+
+You're reading this. The skill predicted it.
+It turns every "I feel this will go viral" into a calibrated experiment.
+It took me from zero to 1M followers in a month. It said I'd write this. I did.
+Your doubt — predicted too.
+
+
+---
+
+## 🎬 What it actually does
+
+Most creators live in the same gambling loop:
+
+> Publish → Numbers come in → Learn nothing → Roll the dice again
+
+A creator who's shipped 200 pieces is barely 10% sharper than someone who's shipped 1 — because they never **kept books** after each round.
+
+**Cheat on Content** makes every judgment get logged, retrospected, absorbed into the next:
+
+📊 Score → 🎯 Blind-predict → 🚀 Publish → 📈 T+3d retro → 🧬 Evolve your rubric
+
+This isn't motivation. It's **compounding** — every piece you don't retro is silently eroding your ability to see yourself.
+
+One month in = you have a hit-formula that's **only yours**.
+Three months in = you're 10× sharper than your first-day self.
+
+---
+
+## 🌀 Origin
+
+> I never believed in fate. Until this skill made me film a video — and predicted exactly how much traffic that video would pull.
+>
+> I tried to break it. I told my audience. I hoped collective observation would collapse the wave function and shift the trajectory.
+>
+> The data was accurate.
+>
+> I didn't escape fate. I just moved from first-order to second-order.
+>
+> If even my awakening — even my audience's observation — was already in its prediction, then right now, reading this:
+> are you here out of curiosity, or just closing the algorithm's last move?
+>
+> — *the creator*
+
+---
+
+## ⚖️ How it differs from other "creator tools"
+
+| Others | This |
+|---|---|
+| Give you "inspiration" | Make **your own intuition** measurable |
+| AI writes for you | AI **judges** for you — the script stays yours |
+| Ship 10 versions, A/B test | Ship one — **bet** in writing, settle the books with data |
+| Static dashboard | An **evolving rubric** — your formula 3 months from now isn't the starting one |
+
+In a sentence: other tools help you "ship more." This helps you "judge sharper."
+
+---
+
+## 🤔 Can't I just use ChatGPT / DeepSeek / Doubao?
+
+Those are **general assistants** — they tell everyone the same thing. You ask "will this go viral?" and the answer is fitted to global average opinion, not your channel. Ask again tomorrow — same answer. **It doesn't remember you. It doesn't change because of you.**
+
+This is **your own ops expert** — serving only your one channel:
+
+- The scoring formula is reverse-engineered from **your** history, not the global training distribution
+- Every piece you ship updates its understanding — by month three, judgment accuracy is 10× sharper than day one (**auto-evolving**)
+- It knows your benchmark account, your cadence, the last three reasons you flopped — things ChatGPT forgets after the first reply
+
+General LLMs help everyone. This helps **your** account.
+
+---
+
+## 🛡️ Why the loop actually evolves
+
+📝 **Every piece is logged**: Score and prediction get written before publish, archived end-to-end. Three days later you settle accounts — you see exactly where you were sharp, where you were off. No more vague "I feel this one didn't land."
+
+🔁 **It gets sharper**: Three same-direction misses in a row, the tool actively prompts you to upgrade your scoring formula. **You don't have to remember — it remembers for you.**
+
+🛡️ **Upgrades have a brake**: Switching the formula requires re-scoring all historical samples — only released if it ranks more accurately than the old. Plus a cross-model independent audit — **so you can't fool yourself.**
+
+🪒 **The rubric is a workbench, not a museum**: Observations refuted by data get deleted; observations absorbed into formal dimensions also get deleted. It only holds what's most useful right now.
+
+---
+
+## 📦 Install
+
+```bash
+git clone https://github.com/XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content.git
+cd cheat-on-content
+bash install.sh
+```
+
+> ⚠️ **Upgrading from v0.x?** Run `/cheat-migrate` in your content project after `git pull`. The 1.3 → 1.4 migration is **BREAKING for blind-channel integrity** — it splits `rubric_notes.md` so the blind sub-agent can't leak actuals. Without migrate, blind scoring will keep flagging `non_blind_warning`. See [CHANGELOG](CHANGELOG.md) and [migrations/1.3-to-1.4.md](migrations/1.3-to-1.4.md).
+
+14 sub-skills are symlinked into your agent's skill directory. One install, every content project gets it.
+
+**Supported agents**: Claude Code (default) · Codex (`bash install.sh --codex`) · Both (`bash install.sh --all`)
+
+> Frozen version: `bash install.sh --copy` / `bash install.sh --codex --copy`
+>
+> Uninstall: `bash uninstall.sh` / `bash uninstall.sh --codex` (your content data is not touched)
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 First run
+
+In your content project directory, open a skill-compatible agent and say:
+
+```
+初始化 cheat-on-content
+```
+
+(or `init cheat-on-content`)
+
+Five yes/no questions complete onboarding. **Strongly recommend importing a benchmark account** — 5–10 samples and the tool gets an anchor immediately. Without one, your first 5 predictions land at ±50% precision.
+
+---
+
+## ⚡ Daily use
+
+```
+score this scripts/<...>.md → grade only
+start prediction scripts/<...>.md → blind prediction + decision log
+shot scripts/<...>.md → create video folder + buffer +1
+shipped https://... → buffer -1
+retro videos/<...>/ → T+3d data + retrospective
+status / fetch trends / find topic / bump rubric / find benchmark
+```
+
+Hook-aware agents auto-report buffer + pending retros + top candidates at every session start — no need to ask. Other agents: just say `status`.
+
+Full workflow + sub-skill details: see [SKILL.md](SKILL.md).
+
+---
+
+## 📈 Star History
+
+
+ 
+
+
+---
+
+## 📜 License
+
+MIT. Commercial use, modification, closed-source integration — all fine.
+
+---
+
+*Is this cheating? So was the calculator. So was Google.*
+*The future doesn't reward effort — it rewards those who see the pattern first.*
+
+*You reading this line — that's predicted too.*