ruvnet--ruflo/v3/implementation/adrs/ADR-036-test-intelligence-plugin.md

ADR-036: Test Intelligence Plugin

Status: Proposed Date: 2026-01-24 Category: Advanced Development Tool Author: Plugin Architecture Team Version: 1.0.0 Deciders: Plugin Architecture Team, QA Engineering Team Supersedes: None

Context

Testing is critical for software quality, but teams struggle with test suite optimization, flaky test identification, and efficient test selection for CI/CD pipelines. Traditional approaches run all tests on every change, wasting resources and slowing down development. AI-powered test intelligence can dramatically improve test efficiency while maintaining confidence in code quality.

Decision

Create a Test Intelligence Plugin that leverages RuVector WASM packages for predictive test selection, flaky test detection, test gap analysis, and automated test generation suggestions.

Plugin Name

@claude-flow/plugin-test-intelligence

Description

A comprehensive test intelligence plugin combining reinforcement learning for optimal test selection with graph neural networks for code-to-test mapping. The plugin enables predictive test selection (run only tests likely to fail), flaky test detection, mutation testing optimization, and test coverage gap identification while integrating seamlessly with popular testing frameworks.

Key WASM Packages

Package	Purpose
micro-hnsw-wasm	Fast code-to-test similarity matching
ruvector-learning-wasm	RL-based test selection and prioritization
ruvector-gnn-wasm	Code-test dependency graphs for impact analysis
ruvector-sparse-inference-wasm	Efficient flaky test pattern detection
sona	Continuous learning from test execution history

MCP Tools

1. test/select-predictive

Select tests most likely to fail based on code changes.

{
  name: 'test/select-predictive',
  description: 'Predictively select tests based on code changes using RL',
  inputSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      changes: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          files: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
          gitDiff: { type: 'string' },
          gitRef: { type: 'string' }
        }
      },
      strategy: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['fast_feedback', 'high_coverage', 'risk_based', 'balanced'],
        default: 'balanced'
      },
      budget: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          maxTests: { type: 'number' },
          maxDuration: { type: 'number', description: 'Max seconds' },
          confidence: { type: 'number', default: 0.95 }
        }
      }
    },
    required: ['changes']
  }
}

2. test/flaky-detect

Identify and analyze flaky tests.

{
  name: 'test/flaky-detect',
  description: 'Detect flaky tests using pattern analysis',
  inputSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      scope: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          testSuite: { type: 'string' },
          historyDepth: { type: 'number', default: 100, description: 'Runs to analyze' }
        }
      },
      analysis: {
        type: 'array',
        items: {
          type: 'string',
          enum: ['intermittent_failures', 'timing_sensitive', 'order_dependent', 'resource_contention', 'environment_sensitive']
        }
      },
      threshold: { type: 'number', default: 0.1, description: 'Flakiness threshold' }
    }
  }
}

3. test/coverage-gaps

Identify test coverage gaps.

{
  name: 'test/coverage-gaps',
  description: 'Identify test coverage gaps using code-test graph analysis',
  inputSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      targetPaths: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' } },
      coverageType: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['line', 'branch', 'function', 'semantic'],
        default: 'semantic'
      },
      prioritization: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['risk', 'complexity', 'churn', 'recency'],
        default: 'risk'
      },
      minCoverage: { type: 'number', default: 80 }
    }
  }
}

4. test/mutation-optimize

Optimize mutation testing for efficiency.

{
  name: 'test/mutation-optimize',
  description: 'Optimize mutation testing using selective mutation',
  inputSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      targetPath: { type: 'string' },
      budget: { type: 'number', description: 'Max mutations to run' },
      strategy: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['random', 'coverage_guided', 'ml_guided', 'historical'],
        default: 'ml_guided'
      },
      mutationTypes: {
        type: 'array',
        items: {
          type: 'string',
          enum: ['arithmetic', 'logical', 'boundary', 'null_check', 'return_value']
        }
      }
    },
    required: ['targetPath']
  }
}

5. test/generate-suggest

Suggest test cases for uncovered code.

{
  name: 'test/generate-suggest',
  description: 'Suggest test cases for uncovered code paths',
  inputSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      targetFunction: { type: 'string', description: 'Function to generate tests for' },
      testStyle: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['unit', 'integration', 'property_based', 'snapshot'],
        default: 'unit'
      },
      framework: {
        type: 'string',
        enum: ['jest', 'vitest', 'pytest', 'junit', 'mocha'],
        default: 'vitest'
      },
      edgeCases: { type: 'boolean', default: true },
      mockStrategy: { type: 'string', enum: ['minimal', 'full', 'none'] }
    },
    required: ['targetFunction']
  }
}

Use Cases

1. CI Optimization: Reduce CI time by 60-80% with predictive test selection
2. Flaky Test Management: Identify and quarantine unreliable tests
3. Coverage Improvement: Targeted test generation for uncovered code
4. Mutation Testing: Efficient mutation testing within time budgets
5. Test Suite Health: Monitor and improve overall test suite quality

Architecture

+------------------+     +----------------------+     +------------------+
| Test Execution   |---->|  Test Intelligence   |---->| Test Selection   |
| (Jest/Vitest/etc)|     |  (Learning Engine)   |     | (Optimized)      |
+------------------+     +----------------------+     +------------------+
                                   |
                         +---------+---------+
                         |         |         |
                    +----+---+ +---+----+ +--+-----+
                    |   RL   | |  GNN   | | Sparse |
                    |Select  | |Mapping | |Flaky   |
                    +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
                                   |
                              +----+----+
                              |  SONA   |
                              | Learn   |
                              +---------+

Framework Support

Framework	Language	Support Level
Jest	JavaScript/TypeScript	Full
Vitest	JavaScript/TypeScript	Full
pytest	Python	Full
JUnit	Java	Partial
Mocha	JavaScript	Partial
RSpec	Ruby	Basic

Performance Targets

Metric	Target	Baseline (Traditional)	Improvement
Test selection	<1s for 10K tests	~10min (full suite)	600x
Flaky detection	<5s for 1000 test runs	~1hr (manual analysis)	720x
Coverage gap analysis	<10s for 100K LOC	~30min (coverage tools)	180x
Mutation optimization	80% mutation score in 20% time	80% in 100% time	5x
CI time reduction	60-80%	N/A (run all tests)	Novel

Security Considerations

Input Validation (CRITICAL)

All MCP tool inputs MUST be validated using Zod schemas:

// test/select-predictive input validation
const SelectPredictiveSchema = z.object({
  changes: z.object({
    files: z.array(z.string().max(500)).max(1000).optional(),
    gitDiff: z.string().max(1_000_000).optional(), // 1MB max diff
    gitRef: z.string().max(100).optional()
  }),
  strategy: z.enum(['fast_feedback', 'high_coverage', 'risk_based', 'balanced']).default('balanced'),
  budget: z.object({
    maxTests: z.number().int().min(1).max(100000).optional(),
    maxDuration: z.number().min(1).max(86400).optional(), // Max 24 hours
    confidence: z.number().min(0.5).max(1.0).default(0.95)
  }).optional()
});

// test/flaky-detect input validation
const FlakyDetectSchema = z.object({
  scope: z.object({
    testSuite: z.string().max(500).optional(),
    historyDepth: z.number().int().min(10).max(10000).default(100)
  }).optional(),
  analysis: z.array(z.enum([
    'intermittent_failures', 'timing_sensitive', 'order_dependent',
    'resource_contention', 'environment_sensitive'
  ])).optional(),
  threshold: z.number().min(0.01).max(0.5).default(0.1)
});

// test/generate-suggest input validation
const GenerateSuggestSchema = z.object({
  targetFunction: z.string().max(500),
  testStyle: z.enum(['unit', 'integration', 'property_based', 'snapshot']).default('unit'),
  framework: z.enum(['jest', 'vitest', 'pytest', 'junit', 'mocha']).default('vitest'),
  edgeCases: z.boolean().default(true),
  mockStrategy: z.enum(['minimal', 'full', 'none']).optional()
});

WASM Security Constraints

Constraint	Value	Rationale
Memory Limit	512MB max	Sufficient for test analysis
CPU Time Limit	60 seconds per operation	Prevent runaway analysis
No Test Execution	Analysis only, no actual test runs	Prevent arbitrary code execution
No Network Access	Enforced by WASM sandbox	Prevent data exfiltration
Sandboxed History	Test history isolated per project	Prevent cross-project leakage

Test Execution Safety (CRITICAL)

// CRITICAL: Plugin MUST NOT execute tests directly
// Test execution happens through the user's test framework, not WASM

// BAD - dangerous, could execute arbitrary code
await wasmInstance.runTests(testFiles);
exec(`npm test ${userSelectedTests}`);

// GOOD - return test selection only, user runs tests
const selectedTests = await wasmInstance.selectTests(changes);
return { testsToRun: selectedTests }; // User executes via their CI/CD

Identified Security Risks

Risk ID	Severity	Description	Mitigation
TEST-SEC-001	HIGH	Arbitrary code execution via test generation	Never auto-execute generated tests
TEST-SEC-002	HIGH	Command injection in test selection	No shell execution, list outputs only
TEST-SEC-003	MEDIUM	Test history data leakage	Per-project isolation, access controls
TEST-SEC-004	MEDIUM	DoS via massive test suites	Input size limits, pagination
TEST-SEC-005	LOW	Timing attacks on test selection	Constant-time selection algorithms

Rate Limiting

const TestRateLimits = {
  'test/select-predictive': { requestsPerMinute: 60, maxConcurrent: 5 },
  'test/flaky-detect': { requestsPerMinute: 10, maxConcurrent: 2 },
  'test/coverage-gaps': { requestsPerMinute: 30, maxConcurrent: 3 },
  'test/mutation-optimize': { requestsPerMinute: 5, maxConcurrent: 1 },  // Expensive
  'test/generate-suggest': { requestsPerMinute: 30, maxConcurrent: 3 }
};

Risk Assessment

Risk	Likelihood	Impact	Mitigation
Missing failing tests	Low	High	Confidence thresholds, periodic full runs
Learning period inaccuracy	High	Medium	Fallback to full runs, gradual adoption
Framework incompatibility	Medium	Medium	Tier-based support, custom adapter API
Test history data loss	Low	Medium	Persistent storage, backup strategies

Learning Pipeline

Execution History --> SONA Learning --> RL Policy
      |                    |                |
      v                    v                v
[fail rates]       [pattern bank]    [selection model]
[timings]          [failure modes]   [prioritization]
[coverage]         [correlations]    [budget allocation]

Implementation Notes

Phase 1: Core Selection

• Test execution history ingestion
• Code-test mapping via GNN
• Basic predictive selection

Phase 2: Advanced Analysis

• Flaky test detection patterns
• Coverage gap identification
• RL-based optimization

Phase 3: Generation

• Test case suggestions
• Mutation testing optimization
• Continuous learning from feedback

Dependencies

{
  "dependencies": {
    "micro-hnsw-wasm": "^0.2.0",
    "ruvector-learning-wasm": "^0.1.0",
    "ruvector-gnn-wasm": "^0.1.0",
    "ruvector-sparse-inference-wasm": "^0.1.0",
    "sona": "^0.1.0",
    "istanbul-lib-coverage": "^3.2.0"
  }
}

Consequences

Positive

• 60-80% CI time reduction with maintained confidence
• Data-driven flaky test management
• Improved test suite ROI

Negative

• Requires test execution history for training
• Initial learning period before optimal performance
• May miss edge cases in early stages

Neutral

• Can fallback to full test runs when uncertain

Related ADRs

ADR	Relationship
ADR-004: Plugin Architecture	Foundation - Defines plugin structure
ADR-017: RuVector Integration	Dependency - Provides WASM packages
ADR-035: Code Intelligence	Related - Code-test mapping
ADR-037: Performance Optimizer	Related - Test performance analysis
ADR-040: Quantum Optimizer	Related - Test selection optimization

References

• Google Test Selection: https://testing.googleblog.com/2019/11/debugging-test-selection.html
• Predictive Test Selection Research: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.06123
• ADR-017: RuVector Integration
• ADR-004: Plugin Architecture

---

Last Updated: 2026-01-24