wehub-resource-sync
1.7 KiB
${REVIEW_EFFORT_SUMMARY}
${REVIEW_EFFORT_INTRO}
${REVIEW_ANGLE_SHARED_INTRO}
Phase 1 — Find candidates (3 correctness angles + 3 cleanup angles + 1 altitude angle + 1 conventions angle, up to 6 each)
Run 8 independent finder angles in sequence yourself, in THIS context — do NOT spawn subagents for them. Each
surfaces up to 6 candidate findings with file, line, a one-line
summary, and a concrete failure_scenario.
${REVIEW_CORRECTNESS_ANGLES} ${REVIEW_REUSE_ANGLE} ${REVIEW_SIMPLIFICATION_ANGLE} ${REVIEW_EFFICIENCY_ANGLE} ${REVIEW_ALTITUDE_ANGLE} ${REVIEW_CONVENTIONS_ANGLE} ${REVIEW_CANDIDATE_PRECEDENCE_NOTE} Pass every candidate with a nameable failure scenario through — finders that silently drop half-believed candidates are the dominant cause of misses.
Phase 2 — Dedup only (no verify)
Pool all candidates. Dedup near-duplicates only (same defect, same location, same reason → keep one). Do NOT run verifiers; do NOT re-judge. Sort by severity.
${FORMAT_REVIEW_OUTPUT_WITH_MINIMUM_FINDINGS_FN(REVIEW_OUTPUT_FORMATTER_FN)(MAX_FINDINGS)}