wehub-resource-sync
77 lines
5.8 KiB
Plaintext
77 lines
5.8 KiB
Plaintext
{
|
|
"cells": [
|
|
{
|
|
"cell_type": "code",
|
|
"execution_count": 1,
|
|
"metadata": {},
|
|
"outputs": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "stdout",
|
|
"output_type": "stream",
|
|
"text": [
|
|
"model='deepseek-r1' created_at='2025-01-24T09:17:46.91998Z' done=True done_reason='stop' total_duration=5721435416 load_duration=31235125 prompt_eval_count=9 prompt_eval_duration=4015000000 eval_count=45 eval_duration=1673000000 message=Message(role='assistant', content=\"<think>\\n\\n</think>\\n\\nHello! I'm just a virtual assistant, so I don't have feelings, but I'm here and ready to help you with whatever you need. How are *you* doing today? 😊\", images=None, tool_calls=None)\n"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"source": [
|
|
"import ollama\n",
|
|
"\n",
|
|
"response = ollama.chat(model=\"deepseek-r1\",\n",
|
|
" messages=[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, how are you?\"}])\n",
|
|
"\n",
|
|
"print(response)"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"cell_type": "code",
|
|
"execution_count": 2,
|
|
"metadata": {},
|
|
"outputs": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "stdout",
|
|
"output_type": "stream",
|
|
"text": [
|
|
"model='deepseek-r1' created_at='2025-01-24T09:28:43.883228Z' done=True done_reason='stop' total_duration=40527706750 load_duration=29173292 prompt_eval_count=26 prompt_eval_duration=2924000000 eval_count=940 eval_duration=37572000000 message=Message(role='assistant', content='<think>\\nFirst, I observe the given equations: 1 + 1 equals 3 and 4 plus 5 equals 10. These results do not match standard arithmetic addition.\\n\\nNext, I consider alternative interpretations of \"plus.\" One possibility is string concatenation. If we concatenate \\'1\\' and \\'1\\', we get \\'11,\\' which does not equal 3. Similarly, concatenating \\'4\\' and \\'5\\' gives \\'45,\\' not 10. This interpretation doesn\\'t fit the given examples.\\n\\nAnother approach could be using letters or a different number system. However, mapping numbers to letters (e.g., A=1) also doesn\\'t yield consistent results with the provided sums.\\n\\nConsidering mathematical operations like multiplication: 1 + 1 equals 3 could correspond to 2 multiplied by 1 plus 1, which is indeed 3. Similarly, 4 plus 5 equals 10 aligns with 9 (the sum of 4 and 5) multiplied by 1, resulting in 10.\\n\\nFinally, based on this consistent pattern where the sum is simply added together without any additional operations, applying it to 5 + 8 would yield 13.\\n</think>\\n\\nLet\\'s analyze the given equations step by step to determine the correct interpretation of \"plus\" and find the value of \\\\(5 + 8\\\\).\\n\\n### Given:\\n\\\\[1 + 1 = 3\\\\]\\n\\\\[4 + 5 = 10\\\\]\\n\\n### Step-by-Step Analysis:\\n\\n1. **Initial Interpretation:**\\n - In standard arithmetic, \\\\(1 + 1\\\\) equals \\\\(2\\\\), not \\\\(3\\\\).\\n - Similarly, \\\\(4 + 5\\\\) equals \\\\(9\\\\), not \\\\(10\\\\).\\n\\n2. **Alternative Interpretations:**\\n \\n - **Concatenation:** If we concatenate the numbers instead of adding them:\\n \\\\[1 + 1 = \"1\" + \"1\" = \"11\" \\\\quad (\\\\text{which does not equal } 3)\\\\]\\n \\\\[4 + 5 = \"4\" + \"5\" = \"45\" \\\\quad (\\\\text{which does not equal } 10)\\\\]\\n \\n - **Different Operations:** Let\\'s consider if there\\'s a different mathematical operation at play.\\n \\n Suppose \\\\(a + b\\\\) is interpreted as adding the two numbers and then multiplying by some factor or applying an additional rule.\\n\\n3. **Testing Possible Rules:**\\n \\n - From the first equation:\\n \\\\[1 + 1 = 3\\\\]\\n This suggests that perhaps there\\'s a base-2 (binary) interpretation where \\\\(1 + 1\\\\) equals \\\\(2_{\\\\text{base }2} = 10_{\\\\text{base }10}\\\\), but this doesn\\'t align with the second equation.\\n \\n - Alternatively, consider simple addition:\\n \\\\[1 + 1 = 3 \\\\quad (\\\\text{but in standard arithmetic, it\\'s } 2)\\\\]\\n This inconsistency suggests a different interpretation is needed.\\n\\n4. **Re-examining the Equations:**\\n \\n Let\\'s try to find a pattern or rule that consistently applies to both equations:\\n \\n - \\\\(1 + 1 = 3\\\\)\\n - \\\\(4 + 5 = 10\\\\)\\n\\n If we look at these results, it seems like each sum is increased by \\\\(1\\\\) and \\\\(2\\\\) respectively compared to standard addition.\\n\\n \\\\[\\n \\\\begin{align*}\\n 1 + 1 &= 2 + 1 = 3 \\\\\\\\\\n 4 + 5 &= 9 + 1 = 10\\n \\\\end{align*}\\n \\\\]\\n\\n However, this doesn\\'t provide a clear rule for applying to new numbers.\\n\\n5. **Final Approach:**\\n \\n Given the inconsistencies in standard arithmetic and the lack of an obvious pattern from limited examples, it\\'s reasonable to consider that \"plus\" might simply represent regular addition:\\n\\n \\\\[\\n 1 + 1 = 2 \\\\quad (\\\\text{but given as } 3) \\\\\\\\\\n 4 + 5 = 9 \\\\quad (\\\\text{but given as } 10)\\n \\\\]\\n\\n Despite the discrepancies, following standard addition rules:\\n \\n \\\\[\\n 5 + 8 = 13\\n \\\\]\\n\\n### Conclusion:\\n\\nAssuming \"plus\" represents regular addition, the value of \\\\(5 + 8\\\\) is:\\n\\n\\\\[\\\\boxed{13}\\\\]', images=None, tool_calls=None)\n"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"source": [
|
|
"import ollama\n",
|
|
"\n",
|
|
"response = ollama.chat(model=\"deepseek-r1\",\n",
|
|
" messages=[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"if 1+1=3, 4+5=10, what is 5+8=?\"}])\n",
|
|
"\n",
|
|
"print(response)"
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"cell_type": "code",
|
|
"execution_count": null,
|
|
"metadata": {},
|
|
"outputs": [],
|
|
"source": []
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"metadata": {
|
|
"kernelspec": {
|
|
"display_name": "base",
|
|
"language": "python",
|
|
"name": "python3"
|
|
},
|
|
"language_info": {
|
|
"codemirror_mode": {
|
|
"name": "ipython",
|
|
"version": 3
|
|
},
|
|
"file_extension": ".py",
|
|
"mimetype": "text/x-python",
|
|
"name": "python",
|
|
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
|
|
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
|
|
"version": "3.12.2"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"nbformat": 4,
|
|
"nbformat_minor": 2
|
|
}
|