wehub-resource-sync
e0e362d700
SDK Tests / changes (push) Successful in 2m29s
Real E2E Tests / changes (push) Successful in 2m29s
Deploy Docs Pages / build (push) Has been cancelled
Deploy Docs Pages / deploy (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / JavaScript E2E (docker bridge) (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / Python E2E (docker bridge) (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / Java E2E (docker bridge) (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / C# E2E (docker bridge) (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / Go E2E (docker bridge) (push) Has been cancelled
Real E2E Tests / Real E2E CI (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / SDK CI (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / CLI Tests (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Python SDK Quality (code-interpreter) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Python SDK Quality (sandbox) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Python SDK Tests (code-interpreter) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / JavaScript SDK Quality And Tests (code-interpreter) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / JavaScript SDK Quality And Tests (sandbox) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Python SDK Tests (sandbox) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / CLI Quality (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Kotlin SDK Quality And Tests (sandbox) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Kotlin SDK Quality And Tests (code-interpreter) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / C# SDK Quality And Tests (code-interpreter) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / C# SDK Quality And Tests (sandbox) (push) Has been cancelled
SDK Tests / Go SDK Quality And Tests (push) Has been cancelled
133 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
133 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
---
|
|
title: {{title}}
|
|
authors:
|
|
- "{{author}}"
|
|
creation-date: {{date}}
|
|
last-updated: {{date}}
|
|
status: {{status_metadata}}
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# OSEP-{{proposal_id}}: {{title}}
|
|
|
|
<!-- toc -->
|
|
- [Summary](#summary)
|
|
- [Motivation](#motivation)
|
|
- [Goals](#goals)
|
|
- [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
|
|
- [Requirements](#requirements)
|
|
- [Proposal](#proposal)
|
|
- [Notes/Constraints/Caveats](#notesconstraintscaveats)
|
|
- [Risks and Mitigations](#risks-and-mitigations)
|
|
- [Design Details](#design-details)
|
|
- [Test Plan](#test-plan)
|
|
- [Drawbacks](#drawbacks)
|
|
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
|
|
- [Infrastructure Needed](#infrastructure-needed)
|
|
- [Upgrade & Migration Strategy](#upgrade--migration-strategy)
|
|
<!-- /toc -->
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Brief summary of the proposal. Describe the feature/change and why it matters.
|
|
Aim for 2-3 sentences that explain the problem and proposed solution.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Motivation
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Explain why this work matters and the problem it solves.
|
|
What is the current pain point? Why should OpenSandbox care?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Goals
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Specific, measurable objectives. What does success look like?
|
|
Examples:
|
|
- Reduce deployment time by X%
|
|
- Enable feature Y for users
|
|
- Improve reliability of Z
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Non-Goals
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Clarify what is intentionally out of scope.
|
|
What will NOT be addressed by this proposal?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
List any constraints that must be satisfied.
|
|
What are the hard requirements vs nice-to-haves?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
High-level description of the proposed approach.
|
|
Focus on what, not how. Avoid implementation details.
|
|
Include diagrams or examples if helpful.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Notes/Constraints/Caveats
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
(Optional) Any additional context that reviewers should know up front.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Risks and Mitigations
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Highlight critical risks and how they will be managed.
|
|
Consider: performance, security, compatibility, operational aspects.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Design Details
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Detailed implementation specifics:
|
|
- APIs and interfaces
|
|
- Data models and schema changes
|
|
- Algorithm or logic flow
|
|
- Configuration changes
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Test Plan
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Outline how the change will be verified and tested.
|
|
Include: unit tests, integration tests, QA/E2E tests, manual testing.
|
|
What scenarios must be covered?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Drawbacks
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
What arguments exist against this direction?
|
|
What are the trade-offs?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Alternatives
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
Summarize other approaches that were evaluated.
|
|
Why was this proposal chosen over alternatives?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Infrastructure Needed
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
(Optional) List any new tooling, repos, or environments required.
|
|
Do we need new services, storage, or third-party dependencies?
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
## Upgrade & Migration Strategy
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
(Optional) Describe the migration path for users/operators if needed.
|
|
How will existing setups be upgraded? Are there breaking changes?
|
|
-->
|