Files
wehub-resource-sync b4fbd6fe9f
Deploy Site / deploy-vercel (push) Has been skipped
Deploy Site / deploy-docs (push) Has been skipped
Build Skills Index / build-index (push) Has been skipped
CI / Deny unrelated histories (push) Has been skipped
CI / Detect affected areas (push) Successful in 27m35s
CI / OSV scan (push) Failing after 4s
CI / Build&Test Docker image (push) Successful in 9s
CI / Supply-chain scan (push) Has been skipped
CI / Lint Docker scripts (push) Failing after 5m13s
CI / Check contributors (push) Failing after 12m8s
CI / Docs Site (push) Failing after 12m8s
CI / TypeScript (push) Failing after 12m8s
CI / Python lints (push) Failing after 12m9s
CI / Python tests (push) Failing after 12m9s
CI / Check uv.lock (push) Failing after 23m22s
CI / CI timing report (push) Has been cancelled
Build Skills Index / trigger-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
CI / All required checks pass (push) Has been cancelled
chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
2026-07-13 11:56:03 +08:00

54 lines
2.3 KiB
Python

"""Guard: every `hermes update` path that reports user-modified skills must
also tell the user how to find them.
`hermes update` keeps (does not overwrite) bundled skills the user edited and
prints a ``~ N user-modified (kept)`` count. There are two independent update
code paths in ``hermes_cli/main.py`` that print this notice (the git-pull path
in ``_cmd_update_impl`` and the unpack/install path). Both must point the user
at ``hermes skills list-modified`` so the count is actionable — otherwise,
depending on which path a user hits, they may never learn the discovery command
exists.
This is an *invariant* test (the two sibling notices must agree), not a literal
snapshot: it asserts the relationship "count line ⇒ discovery hint", so it
keeps holding if the wording is reworded, as long as both sites stay in sync.
"""
import re
from pathlib import Path
import hermes_cli.main as main_mod
_COUNT_RE = re.compile(r"user-modified \(kept\)")
_HINT_RE = re.compile(r"hermes skills list-modified")
def _source_lines() -> list[str]:
return Path(main_mod.__file__).read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines()
def test_every_user_modified_notice_points_at_list_modified():
lines = _source_lines()
count_sites = [i for i, ln in enumerate(lines) if _COUNT_RE.search(ln)]
# The notice must exist somewhere (guard against it being deleted outright),
# but we deliberately do NOT assert a fixed *count* of sites: consolidating
# the duplicated print paths into a shared helper is a welcome refactor and
# must not fail this test. The invariant is per-site, not how many sites.
assert count_sites, (
"no 'user-modified (kept)' notice found in main.py — the update "
"summary that surfaces kept user edits appears to have been removed"
)
for idx in count_sites:
# The count print and its discovery hint sit on adjacent lines; allow a
# small window so wording/formatting tweaks don't break the check.
window = "\n".join(lines[idx : idx + 5])
assert _HINT_RE.search(window), (
"a 'user-modified (kept)' notice near line "
f"{idx + 1} of main.py does not point users at "
"`hermes skills list-modified` within the following lines — the "
"update paths have drifted apart again:\n" + window
)