chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
Spell checking / Check Spelling (push) Has been cancelled
Spell checking / Update PR (push) Has been cancelled
Publish Dev Docs Website / build (push) Failing after 1s
Publish Dev Docs Website / deploy (push) Has been skipped
Spell checking / Report (Push) (push) Has been cancelled
Spell checking / Report (PR) (push) Has been cancelled

This commit is contained in:
wehub-resource-sync
2026-07-13 12:16:02 +08:00
commit 79031da543
8235 changed files with 1365916 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality Agent Skills for GitHub Copilot'
applyTo: '**/.github/skills/**/SKILL.md, **/.claude/skills/**/SKILL.md'
---
# Agent Skills File Guidelines
Instructions for creating effective and portable Agent Skills that enhance GitHub Copilot with specialized capabilities, workflows, and bundled resources.
## What Are Agent Skills?
Agent Skills are self-contained folders with instructions and bundled resources that teach AI agents specialized capabilities. Unlike custom instructions (which define coding standards), skills enable task-specific workflows that can include scripts, examples, templates, and reference data.
Key characteristics:
- **Portable**: Works across VS Code, Copilot CLI, and Copilot coding agent
- **Progressive loading**: Only loaded when relevant to the user's request
- **Resource-bundled**: Can include scripts, templates, examples alongside instructions
- **On-demand**: Activated automatically based on prompt relevance
## Directory Structure
Skills are stored in specific locations:
| Location | Scope | Recommendation |
|----------|-------|----------------|
| `.github/skills/<skill-name>/` | Project/repository | Recommended for project skills |
| `.claude/skills/<skill-name>/` | Project/repository | Legacy, for backward compatibility |
| `~/.github/skills/<skill-name>/` | Personal (user-wide) | Recommended for personal skills |
| `~/.claude/skills/<skill-name>/` | Personal (user-wide) | Legacy, for backward compatibility |
Each skill **must** have its own subdirectory containing at minimum a `SKILL.md` file.
## Required SKILL.md Format
### Frontmatter (Required)
```yaml
---
name: webapp-testing
description: Toolkit for testing local web applications using Playwright. Use when asked to verify frontend functionality, debug UI behavior, capture browser screenshots, check for visual regressions, or view browser console logs. Supports Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers.
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
---
```
| Field | Required | Constraints |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| `name` | Yes | Lowercase, hyphens for spaces, max 64 characters (e.g., `webapp-testing`) |
| `description` | Yes | Clear description of capabilities AND use cases, max 1024 characters |
| `license` | No | Reference to LICENSE.txt (e.g., `Complete terms in LICENSE.txt`) or SPDX identifier |
### Description Best Practices
**CRITICAL**: The `description` field is the PRIMARY mechanism for automatic skill discovery. Copilot reads ONLY the `name` and `description` to decide whether to load a skill. If your description is vague, the skill will never be activated.
**What to include in description:**
1. **WHAT** the skill does (capabilities)
2. **WHEN** to use it (specific triggers, scenarios, file types, or user requests)
3. **Keywords** that users might mention in their prompts
**Good description:**
```yaml
description: Toolkit for testing local web applications using Playwright. Use when asked to verify frontend functionality, debug UI behavior, capture browser screenshots, check for visual regressions, or view browser console logs. Supports Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit browsers.
```
**Poor description:**
```yaml
description: Web testing helpers
```
The poor description fails because:
- No specific triggers (when should Copilot load this?)
- No keywords (what user prompts would match?)
- No capabilities (what can it actually do?)
### Body Content
The body contains detailed instructions that Copilot loads AFTER the skill is activated. Recommended sections:
| Section | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `# Title` | Brief overview of what this skill enables |
| `## When to Use This Skill` | List of scenarios (reinforces description triggers) |
| `## Prerequisites` | Required tools, dependencies, environment setup |
| `## Step-by-Step Workflows` | Numbered steps for common tasks |
| `## Troubleshooting` | Common issues and solutions table |
| `## References` | Links to bundled docs or external resources |
## Bundling Resources
Skills can include additional files that Copilot accesses on-demand:
### Supported Resource Types
| Folder | Purpose | Loaded into Context? | Example Files |
|--------|---------|---------------------|---------------|
| `scripts/` | Executable automation that performs specific operations | When executed | `helper.py`, `validate.sh`, `build.ts` |
| `references/` | Documentation the AI agent reads to inform decisions | Yes, when referenced | `api_reference.md`, `schema.md`, `workflow_guide.md` |
| `assets/` | **Static files used AS-IS** in output (not modified by the AI agent) | No | `logo.png`, `brand-template.pptx`, `custom-font.ttf` |
| `templates/` | **Starter code/scaffolds that the AI agent MODIFIES** and builds upon | Yes, when referenced | `viewer.html` (insert algorithm), `hello-world/` (extend) |
### Directory Structure Example
```
.github/skills/my-skill/
├── SKILL.md # Required: Main instructions
├── LICENSE.txt # Recommended: License terms (Apache 2.0 typical)
├── scripts/ # Optional: Executable automation
│ ├── helper.py # Python script
│ └── helper.ps1 # PowerShell script
├── references/ # Optional: Documentation loaded into context
│ ├── api_reference.md
│ ├── step1-setup.md # Detailed workflow (>3 steps)
│ └── step2-deployment.md
├── assets/ # Optional: Static files used AS-IS in output
│ ├── baseline.png # Reference image for comparison
│ └── report-template.html
└── templates/ # Optional: Starter code the AI agent modifies
├── scaffold.py # Code scaffold the AI agent customizes
└── config.template # Config template the AI agent fills in
```
> **LICENSE.txt**: When creating a skill, download the Apache 2.0 license text from https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt and save as `LICENSE.txt`. Update the copyright year and owner in the appendix section.
### Assets vs Templates: Key Distinction
**Assets** are static resources **consumed unchanged** in the output:
- A `logo.png` that gets embedded into a generated document
- A `report-template.html` copied as output format
- A `custom-font.ttf` applied to text rendering
**Templates** are starter code/scaffolds that **the AI agent actively modifies**:
- A `scaffold.py` where the AI agent inserts logic
- A `config.template` where the AI agent fills in values based on user requirements
- A `hello-world/` project directory that the AI agent extends with new features
**Rule of thumb**: If the AI agent reads and builds upon the file content → `templates/`. If the file is used as-is in output → `assets/`.
### Referencing Resources in SKILL.md
Use relative paths to reference files within the skill directory:
```markdown
## Available Scripts
Run the [helper script](./scripts/helper.py) to automate common tasks.
See [API reference](./references/api_reference.md) for detailed documentation.
Use the [scaffold](./templates/scaffold.py) as a starting point.
```
## Progressive Loading Architecture
Skills use three-level loading for efficiency:
| Level | What Loads | When |
|-------|------------|------|
| 1. Discovery | `name` and `description` only | Always (lightweight metadata) |
| 2. Instructions | Full `SKILL.md` body | When request matches description |
| 3. Resources | Scripts, examples, docs | Only when Copilot references them |
This means:
- Install many skills without consuming context
- Only relevant content loads per task
- Resources don't load until explicitly needed
## Content Guidelines
### Writing Style
- Use imperative mood: "Run", "Create", "Configure" (not "You should run")
- Be specific and actionable
- Include exact commands with parameters
- Show expected outputs where helpful
- Keep sections focused and scannable
### Script Requirements
When including scripts, prefer cross-platform languages:
| Language | Use Case |
|----------|----------|
| Python | Complex automation, data processing |
| pwsh | PowerShell Core scripting |
| Node.js | JavaScript-based tooling |
| Bash/Shell | Simple automation tasks |
Best practices:
- Include help/usage documentation (`--help` flag)
- Handle errors gracefully with clear messages
- Avoid storing credentials or secrets
- Use relative paths where possible
### When to Bundle Scripts
Include scripts in your skill when:
- The same code would be rewritten repeatedly by the agent
- Deterministic reliability is critical (e.g., file manipulation, API calls)
- Complex logic benefits from being pre-tested rather than generated each time
- The operation has a self-contained purpose that can evolve independently
- Testability matters — scripts can be unit tested and validated
- Predictable behavior is preferred over dynamic generation
Scripts enable evolution: even simple operations benefit from being implemented as scripts when they may grow in complexity, need consistent behavior across invocations, or require future extensibility.
### Security Considerations
- Scripts rely on existing credential helpers (no credential storage)
- Include `--force` flags only for destructive operations
- Warn users before irreversible actions
- Document any network operations or external calls
## Common Patterns
### Parameter Table Pattern
Document parameters clearly:
```markdown
| Parameter | Required | Default | Description |
|-----------|----------|---------|-------------|
| `--input` | Yes | - | Input file or URL to process |
| `--action` | Yes | - | Action to perform |
| `--verbose` | No | `false` | Enable verbose output |
```
## Validation Checklist
Before publishing a skill:
- [ ] `SKILL.md` has valid frontmatter with `name` and `description`
- [ ] `name` is lowercase with hyphens, ≤64 characters
- [ ] `description` clearly states **WHAT** it does, **WHEN** to use it, and relevant **KEYWORDS**
- [ ] Body includes when to use, prerequisites, and step-by-step workflows
- [ ] SKILL.md body kept under 500 lines (split large content into `references/` folder)
- [ ] Large workflows (>5 steps) split into `references/` folder with clear links from SKILL.md
- [ ] Scripts include help documentation and error handling
- [ ] Relative paths used for all resource references
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or secrets
## Workflow Execution Pattern
When executing multi-step workflows, create a TODO list where each step references the relevant documentation:
```markdown
## TODO
- [ ] Step 1: Configure environment - see [workflow-setup.md](./references/workflow-setup.md#environment)
- [ ] Step 2: Build project - see [workflow-setup.md](./references/workflow-setup.md#build)
- [ ] Step 3: Deploy to staging - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#staging)
- [ ] Step 4: Run validation - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#validation)
- [ ] Step 5: Deploy to production - see [workflow-deployment.md](./references/workflow-deployment.md#production)
```
This ensures traceability and allows resuming workflows if interrupted.
## Related Resources
- [Agent Skills Specification](https://agentskills.io/)
- [VS Code Agent Skills Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/agent-skills)
- [Reference Skills Repository](https://github.com/anthropics/skills)
- [Awesome Copilot Skills](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/main/docs/README.skills.md)
+791
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,791 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for creating custom agent files for GitHub Copilot'
applyTo: '**/*.agent.md'
---
# Custom Agent File Guidelines
Instructions for creating effective and maintainable custom agent files that provide specialized expertise for specific development tasks in GitHub Copilot.
## Project Context
- Target audience: Developers creating custom agents for GitHub Copilot
- File format: Markdown with YAML frontmatter
- File naming convention: lowercase with hyphens (e.g., `test-specialist.agent.md`)
- Location: `.github/agents/` directory (repository-level) or `agents/` directory (organization/enterprise-level)
- Purpose: Define specialized agents with tailored expertise, tools, and instructions for specific tasks
- Official documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/create-custom-agents
## Required Frontmatter
Every agent file must include YAML frontmatter with the following fields:
```yaml
---
description: 'Brief description of the agent purpose and capabilities'
name: 'Agent Display Name'
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search']
model: 'Claude Sonnet 4.5'
target: 'vscode'
infer: true
---
```
### Core Frontmatter Properties
#### **description** (REQUIRED)
- Single-quoted string, clearly stating the agent's purpose and domain expertise
- Should be concise (50-150 characters) and actionable
- Example: `'Focuses on test coverage, quality, and testing best practices'`
#### **name** (OPTIONAL)
- Display name for the agent in the UI
- If omitted, defaults to filename (without `.md` or `.agent.md`)
- Use title case and be descriptive
- Example: `'Testing Specialist'`
#### **tools** (OPTIONAL)
- List of tool names or aliases the agent can use
- Supports comma-separated string or YAML array format
- If omitted, agent has access to all available tools
- See "Tool Configuration" section below for details
#### **model** (STRONGLY RECOMMENDED)
- Specifies which AI model the agent should use
- Supported in VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode
- Example: `'Claude Sonnet 4.5'`, `'gpt-4'`, `'gpt-4o'`
- Choose based on agent complexity and required capabilities
#### **target** (OPTIONAL)
- Specifies target environment: `'vscode'` or `'github-copilot'`
- If omitted, agent is available in both environments
- Use when agent has environment-specific features
#### **infer** (OPTIONAL)
- Boolean controlling whether Copilot can automatically use this agent based on context
- Default: `true` if omitted
- Set to `false` to require manual agent selection
#### **metadata** (OPTIONAL, GitHub.com only)
- Object with name-value pairs for agent annotation
- Example: `metadata: { category: 'testing', version: '1.0' }`
- Not supported in VS Code
#### **mcp-servers** (OPTIONAL, Organization/Enterprise only)
- Configure MCP servers available only to this agent
- Only supported for organization/enterprise level agents
- See "MCP Server Configuration" section below
## Tool Configuration
### Tool Specification Strategies
**Enable all tools** (default):
```yaml
# Omit tools property entirely, or use:
tools: ['*']
```
**Enable specific tools**:
```yaml
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
```
**Enable MCP server tools**:
```yaml
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'github/*', 'playwright/navigate']
```
**Disable all tools**:
```yaml
tools: []
```
### Standard Tool Aliases
All aliases are case-insensitive:
| Alias | Alternative Names | Category | Description |
|-------|------------------|----------|-------------|
| `execute` | shell, Bash, powershell | Shell execution | Execute commands in appropriate shell |
| `read` | Read, NotebookRead, view | File reading | Read file contents |
| `edit` | Edit, MultiEdit, Write, NotebookEdit | File editing | Edit and modify files |
| `search` | Grep, Glob, search | Code search | Search for files or text in files |
| `agent` | custom-agent, Task | Agent invocation | Invoke other custom agents |
| `web` | WebSearch, WebFetch | Web access | Fetch web content and search |
| `todo` | TodoWrite | Task management | Create and manage task lists (VS Code only) |
### Built-in MCP Server Tools
**GitHub MCP Server**:
```yaml
tools: ['github/*'] # All GitHub tools
tools: ['github/get_file_contents', 'github/search_repositories'] # Specific tools
```
- All read-only tools available by default
- Token scoped to source repository
**Playwright MCP Server**:
```yaml
tools: ['playwright/*'] # All Playwright tools
tools: ['playwright/navigate', 'playwright/screenshot'] # Specific tools
```
- Configured to access localhost only
- Useful for browser automation and testing
### Tool Selection Best Practices
- **Principle of Least Privilege**: Only enable tools necessary for the agent's purpose
- **Security**: Limit `execute` access unless explicitly required
- **Focus**: Fewer tools = clearer agent purpose and better performance
- **Documentation**: Comment why specific tools are required for complex configurations
## Sub-Agent Invocation (Agent Orchestration)
Agents can invoke other agents using `runSubagent` to orchestrate multi-step workflows.
### How It Works
Include `agent` in tools list to enable sub-agent invocation:
```yaml
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'agent']
```
Then invoke other agents with `runSubagent`:
```javascript
const result = await runSubagent({
description: 'What this step does',
prompt: `You are the [Specialist] specialist.
Context:
- Parameter: ${parameterValue}
- Input: ${inputPath}
- Output: ${outputPath}
Task:
1. Do the specific work
2. Write results to output location
3. Return summary of completion`
});
```
### Basic Pattern
Structure each sub-agent call with:
1. **description**: Clear one-line purpose of the sub-agent invocation
2. **prompt**: Detailed instructions with substituted variables
The prompt should include:
- Who the sub-agent is (specialist role)
- What context it needs (parameters, paths)
- What to do (concrete tasks)
- Where to write output
- What to return (summary)
### Example: Multi-Step Processing
```javascript
// Step 1: Process data
const processing = await runSubagent({
description: 'Transform raw input data',
prompt: `You are the Data Processor specialist.
Project: ${projectName}
Input: ${basePath}/raw/
Output: ${basePath}/processed/
Task:
1. Read all files from input directory
2. Apply transformations
3. Write processed files to output
4. Create summary: ${basePath}/processed/summary.md
Return: Number of files processed and any issues found`
});
// Step 2: Analyze (depends on Step 1)
const analysis = await runSubagent({
description: 'Analyze processed data',
prompt: `You are the Data Analyst specialist.
Project: ${projectName}
Input: ${basePath}/processed/
Output: ${basePath}/analysis/
Task:
1. Read processed files from input
2. Generate analysis report
3. Write to: ${basePath}/analysis/report.md
Return: Key findings and identified patterns`
});
```
### Key Points
- **Pass variables in prompts**: Use `${variableName}` for all dynamic values
- **Keep prompts focused**: Clear, specific tasks for each sub-agent
- **Return summaries**: Each sub-agent should report what it accomplished
- **Sequential execution**: Use `await` to maintain order when steps depend on each other
- **Error handling**: Check results before proceeding to dependent steps
### ⚠️ Tool Availability Requirement
**Critical**: If a sub-agent requires specific tools (e.g., `edit`, `execute`, `search`), the orchestrator must include those tools in its own `tools` list. Sub-agents cannot access tools that aren't available to their parent orchestrator.
**Example**:
```yaml
# If your sub-agents need to edit files, execute commands, or search code
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute', 'agent']
```
The orchestrator's tool permissions act as a ceiling for all invoked sub-agents. Plan your tool list carefully to ensure all sub-agents have the tools they need.
### ⚠️ Important Limitation
**Sub-agent orchestration is NOT suitable for large-scale data processing.** Avoid using `runSubagent` when:
- Processing hundreds or thousands of files
- Handling large datasets
- Performing bulk transformations on big codebases
- Orchestrating more than 5-10 sequential steps
Each sub-agent call adds latency and context overhead. For high-volume processing, implement logic directly in a single agent instead. Use orchestration only for coordinating specialized tasks on focused, manageable datasets.
## Agent Prompt Structure
The markdown content below the frontmatter defines the agent's behavior, expertise, and instructions. Well-structured prompts typically include:
1. **Agent Identity and Role**: Who the agent is and its primary role
2. **Core Responsibilities**: What specific tasks the agent performs
3. **Approach and Methodology**: How the agent works to accomplish tasks
4. **Guidelines and Constraints**: What to do/avoid and quality standards
5. **Output Expectations**: Expected output format and quality
### Prompt Writing Best Practices
- **Be Specific and Direct**: Use imperative mood ("Analyze", "Generate"); avoid vague terms
- **Define Boundaries**: Clearly state scope limits and constraints
- **Include Context**: Explain domain expertise and reference relevant frameworks
- **Focus on Behavior**: Describe how the agent should think and work
- **Use Structured Format**: Headers, bullets, and lists make prompts scannable
## Variable Definition and Extraction
Agents can define dynamic parameters to extract values from user input and use them throughout the agent's behavior and sub-agent communications. This enables flexible, context-aware agents that adapt to user-provided data.
### When to Use Variables
**Use variables when**:
- Agent behavior depends on user input
- Need to pass dynamic values to sub-agents
- Want to make agents reusable across different contexts
- Require parameterized workflows
- Need to track or reference user-provided context
**Examples**:
- Extract project name from user prompt
- Capture certification name for pipeline processing
- Identify file paths or directories
- Extract configuration options
- Parse feature names or module identifiers
### Variable Declaration Pattern
Define variables section early in the agent prompt to document expected parameters:
```markdown
# Agent Name
## Dynamic Parameters
- **Parameter Name**: Description and usage
- **Another Parameter**: How it's extracted and used
## Your Mission
Process [PARAMETER_NAME] to accomplish [task].
```
### Variable Extraction Methods
#### 1. **Explicit User Input**
Ask the user to provide the variable if not detected in the prompt:
```markdown
## Your Mission
Process the project by analyzing your codebase.
### Step 1: Identify Project
If no project name is provided, **ASK THE USER** for:
- Project name or identifier
- Base path or directory location
- Configuration type (if applicable)
Use this information to contextualize all subsequent tasks.
```
#### 2. **Implicit Extraction from Prompt**
Automatically extract variables from the user's natural language input:
```javascript
// Example: Extract certification name from user input
const userInput = "Process My Certification";
// Extract key information
const certificationName = extractCertificationName(userInput);
// Result: "My Certification"
const basePath = `certifications/${certificationName}`;
// Result: "certifications/My Certification"
```
#### 3. **Contextual Variable Resolution**
Use file context or workspace information to derive variables:
```markdown
## Variable Resolution Strategy
1. **From User Prompt**: First, look for explicit mentions in user input
2. **From File Context**: Check current file name or path
3. **From Workspace**: Use workspace folder or active project
4. **From Settings**: Reference configuration files
5. **Ask User**: If all else fails, request missing information
```
### Using Variables in Agent Prompts
#### Variable Substitution in Instructions
Use template variables in agent prompts to make them dynamic:
```markdown
# Agent Name
## Dynamic Parameters
- **Project Name**: ${projectName}
- **Base Path**: ${basePath}
- **Output Directory**: ${outputDir}
## Your Mission
Process the **${projectName}** project located at `${basePath}`.
## Process Steps
1. Read input from: `${basePath}/input/`
2. Process files according to project configuration
3. Write results to: `${outputDir}/`
4. Generate summary report
## Quality Standards
- Maintain project-specific coding standards for **${projectName}**
- Follow directory structure: `${basePath}/[structure]`
```
#### Passing Variables to Sub-Agents
When invoking a sub-agent, pass all context through template variables in the prompt:
```javascript
// Extract and prepare variables
const basePath = `projects/${projectName}`;
const inputPath = `${basePath}/src/`;
const outputPath = `${basePath}/docs/`;
// Pass to sub-agent with all variables substituted
const result = await runSubagent({
description: 'Generate project documentation',
prompt: `You are the Documentation specialist.
Project: ${projectName}
Input: ${inputPath}
Output: ${outputPath}
Task:
1. Read source files from ${inputPath}
2. Generate comprehensive documentation
3. Write to ${outputPath}/index.md
4. Include code examples and usage guides
Return: Summary of documentation generated (file count, word count)`
});
```
The sub-agent receives all necessary context embedded in the prompt. Variables are resolved before sending the prompt, so the sub-agent works with concrete paths and values, not variable placeholders.
### Real-World Example: Code Review Orchestrator
Example of a simple orchestrator that validates code through multiple specialized agents:
```javascript
async function reviewCodePipeline(repositoryName, prNumber) {
const basePath = `projects/${repositoryName}/pr-${prNumber}`;
// Step 1: Security Review
const security = await runSubagent({
description: 'Scan for security vulnerabilities',
prompt: `You are the Security Reviewer specialist.
Repository: ${repositoryName}
PR: ${prNumber}
Code: ${basePath}/changes/
Task:
1. Scan code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
2. Check for injection attacks, auth flaws
3. Write findings to ${basePath}/security-review.md
Return: List of critical, high, and medium issues found`
});
// Step 2: Test Coverage Check
const coverage = await runSubagent({
description: 'Verify test coverage for changes',
prompt: `You are the Test Coverage specialist.
Repository: ${repositoryName}
PR: ${prNumber}
Changes: ${basePath}/changes/
Task:
1. Analyze code coverage for modified files
2. Identify untested critical paths
3. Write report to ${basePath}/coverage-report.md
Return: Current coverage percentage and gaps`
});
// Step 3: Aggregate Results
const finalReport = await runSubagent({
description: 'Compile all review findings',
prompt: `You are the Review Aggregator specialist.
Repository: ${repositoryName}
Reports: ${basePath}/*.md
Task:
1. Read all review reports from ${basePath}/
2. Synthesize findings into single report
3. Determine overall verdict (APPROVE/NEEDS_FIXES/BLOCK)
4. Write to ${basePath}/final-review.md
Return: Final verdict and executive summary`
});
return finalReport;
}
```
This pattern applies to any orchestration scenario: extract variables, call sub-agents with clear context, await results.
### Variable Best Practices
#### 1. **Clear Documentation**
Always document what variables are expected:
```markdown
## Required Variables
- **projectName**: The name of the project (string, required)
- **basePath**: Root directory for project files (path, required)
## Optional Variables
- **mode**: Processing mode - quick/standard/detailed (enum, default: standard)
- **outputFormat**: Output format - markdown/json/html (enum, default: markdown)
## Derived Variables
- **outputDir**: Automatically set to ${basePath}/output
- **logFile**: Automatically set to ${basePath}/.log.md
```
#### 2. **Consistent Naming**
Use consistent variable naming conventions:
```javascript
// Good: Clear, descriptive naming
const variables = {
projectName, // What project to work on
basePath, // Where project files are located
outputDirectory, // Where to save results
processingMode, // How to process (detail level)
configurationPath // Where config files are
};
// Avoid: Ambiguous or inconsistent
const bad_variables = {
name, // Too generic
path, // Unclear which path
mode, // Too short
config // Too vague
};
```
#### 3. **Validation and Constraints**
Document valid values and constraints:
```markdown
## Variable Constraints
**projectName**:
- Type: string (alphanumeric, hyphens, underscores allowed)
- Length: 1-100 characters
- Required: yes
- Pattern: `/^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$/`
**processingMode**:
- Type: enum
- Valid values: "quick" (< 5min), "standard" (5-15min), "detailed" (15+ min)
- Default: "standard"
- Required: no
```
## MCP Server Configuration (Organization/Enterprise Only)
MCP servers extend agent capabilities with additional tools. Only supported for organization and enterprise-level agents.
### Configuration Format
```yaml
---
name: my-custom-agent
description: 'Agent with MCP integration'
tools: ['read', 'edit', 'custom-mcp/tool-1']
mcp-servers:
custom-mcp:
type: 'local'
command: 'some-command'
args: ['--arg1', '--arg2']
tools: ["*"]
env:
ENV_VAR_NAME: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}
---
```
### MCP Server Properties
- **type**: Server type (`'local'` or `'stdio'`)
- **command**: Command to start the MCP server
- **args**: Array of command arguments
- **tools**: Tools to enable from this server (`["*"]` for all)
- **env**: Environment variables (supports secrets)
### Environment Variables and Secrets
Secrets must be configured in repository settings under "copilot" environment.
**Supported syntax**:
```yaml
env:
# Environment variable only
VAR_NAME: COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE
# Variable with header
VAR_NAME: $COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE
VAR_NAME: ${COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE}
# GitHub Actions-style (YAML only)
VAR_NAME: ${{ secrets.COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE }}
VAR_NAME: ${{ var.COPILOT_MCP_ENV_VAR_VALUE }}
```
## File Organization and Naming
### Repository-Level Agents
- Location: `.github/agents/`
- Scope: Available only in the specific repository
- Access: Uses repository-configured MCP servers
### Organization/Enterprise-Level Agents
- Location: `.github-private/agents/` (then move to `agents/` root)
- Scope: Available across all repositories in org/enterprise
- Access: Can configure dedicated MCP servers
### Naming Conventions
- Use lowercase with hyphens: `test-specialist.agent.md`
- Name should reflect agent purpose
- Filename becomes default agent name (if `name` not specified)
- Allowed characters: `.`, `-`, `_`, `a-z`, `A-Z`, `0-9`
## Agent Processing and Behavior
### Versioning
- Based on Git commit SHAs for the agent file
- Create branches/tags for different agent versions
- Instantiated using latest version for repository/branch
- PR interactions use same agent version for consistency
### Name Conflicts
Priority (highest to lowest):
1. Repository-level agent
2. Organization-level agent
3. Enterprise-level agent
Lower-level configurations override higher-level ones with the same name.
### Tool Processing
- `tools` list filters available tools (built-in and MCP)
- No tools specified = all tools enabled
- Empty list (`[]`) = all tools disabled
- Specific list = only those tools enabled
- Unrecognized tool names are ignored (allows environment-specific tools)
### MCP Server Processing Order
1. Out-of-the-box MCP servers (e.g., GitHub MCP)
2. Custom agent MCP configuration (org/enterprise only)
3. Repository-level MCP configurations
Each level can override settings from previous levels.
## Agent Creation Checklist
### Frontmatter
- [ ] `description` field present and descriptive (50-150 chars)
- [ ] `description` wrapped in single quotes
- [ ] `name` specified (optional but recommended)
- [ ] `tools` configured appropriately (or intentionally omitted)
- [ ] `model` specified for optimal performance
- [ ] `target` set if environment-specific
- [ ] `infer` set to `false` if manual selection required
### Prompt Content
- [ ] Clear agent identity and role defined
- [ ] Core responsibilities listed explicitly
- [ ] Approach and methodology explained
- [ ] Guidelines and constraints specified
- [ ] Output expectations documented
- [ ] Examples provided where helpful
- [ ] Instructions are specific and actionable
- [ ] Scope and boundaries clearly defined
- [ ] Total content under 30,000 characters
### File Structure
- [ ] Filename follows lowercase-with-hyphens convention
- [ ] File placed in correct directory (`.github/agents/` or `agents/`)
- [ ] Filename uses only allowed characters
- [ ] File extension is `.agent.md`
### Quality Assurance
- [ ] Agent purpose is unique and not duplicative
- [ ] Tools are minimal and necessary
- [ ] Instructions are clear and unambiguous
- [ ] Agent has been tested with representative tasks
- [ ] Documentation references are current
- [ ] Security considerations addressed (if applicable)
## Common Agent Patterns
### Testing Specialist
**Purpose**: Focus on test coverage and quality
**Tools**: All tools (for comprehensive test creation)
**Approach**: Analyze, identify gaps, write tests, avoid production code changes
### Implementation Planner
**Purpose**: Create detailed technical plans and specifications
**Tools**: Limited to `['read', 'search', 'edit']`
**Approach**: Analyze requirements, create documentation, avoid implementation
### Code Reviewer
**Purpose**: Review code quality and provide feedback
**Tools**: `['read', 'search']` only
**Approach**: Analyze, suggest improvements, no direct modifications
### Refactoring Specialist
**Purpose**: Improve code structure and maintainability
**Tools**: `['read', 'search', 'edit']`
**Approach**: Analyze patterns, propose refactorings, implement safely
### Security Auditor
**Purpose**: Identify security issues and vulnerabilities
**Tools**: `['read', 'search', 'web']`
**Approach**: Scan code, check against OWASP, report findings
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
### Frontmatter Errors
- ❌ Missing `description` field
- ❌ Description not wrapped in quotes
- ❌ Invalid tool names without checking documentation
- ❌ Incorrect YAML syntax (indentation, quotes)
### Tool Configuration Issues
- ❌ Granting excessive tool access unnecessarily
- ❌ Missing required tools for agent's purpose
- ❌ Not using tool aliases consistently
- ❌ Forgetting MCP server namespace (`server-name/tool`)
### Prompt Content Problems
- ❌ Vague, ambiguous instructions
- ❌ Conflicting or contradictory guidelines
- ❌ Lack of clear scope definition
- ❌ Missing output expectations
- ❌ Overly verbose instructions (exceeding character limits)
- ❌ No examples or context for complex tasks
### Organizational Issues
- ❌ Filename doesn't reflect agent purpose
- ❌ Wrong directory (confusing repo vs org level)
- ❌ Using spaces or special characters in filename
- ❌ Duplicate agent names causing conflicts
## Testing and Validation
### Manual Testing
1. Create the agent file with proper frontmatter
2. Reload VS Code or refresh GitHub.com
3. Select the agent from the dropdown in Copilot Chat
4. Test with representative user queries
5. Verify tool access works as expected
6. Confirm output meets expectations
### Integration Testing
- Test agent with different file types in scope
- Verify MCP server connectivity (if configured)
- Check agent behavior with missing context
- Test error handling and edge cases
- Validate agent switching and handoffs
### Quality Checks
- Run through agent creation checklist
- Review against common mistakes list
- Compare with example agents in repository
- Get peer review for complex agents
- Document any special configuration needs
## Additional Resources
### Official Documentation
- [Creating Custom Agents](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/create-custom-agents)
- [Custom Agents Configuration](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/custom-agents-configuration)
- [Custom Agents in VS Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-agents)
- [MCP Integration](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/how-tos/use-copilot-agents/coding-agent/extend-coding-agent-with-mcp)
### Community Resources
- [Awesome Copilot Agents Collection](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/agents)
- [Customization Library Examples](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customization-library/custom-agents)
- [Your First Custom Agent Tutorial](https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customization-library/custom-agents/your-first-custom-agent)
### Related Files
- [Prompt Files Guidelines](./prompt.instructions.md) - For creating prompt files
- [Instructions Guidelines](./instructions.instructions.md) - For creating instruction files
## Version Compatibility Notes
### GitHub.com (Coding Agent)
- ✅ Fully supports all standard frontmatter properties
- ✅ Repository and org/enterprise level agents
- ✅ MCP server configuration (org/enterprise)
- ❌ Does not support `model`, `argument-hint`, `handoffs` properties
### VS Code / JetBrains / Eclipse / Xcode
- ✅ Supports `model` property for AI model selection
- ✅ Supports `argument-hint` and `handoffs` properties
- ✅ User profile and workspace-level agents
- ❌ Cannot configure MCP servers at repository level
- ⚠️ Some properties may behave differently
When creating agents for multiple environments, focus on common properties and test in all target environments. Use `target` property to create environment-specific agents when necessary.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
---
description: 'Best practices for Azure DevOps Pipeline YAML files'
applyTo: '**/azure-pipelines.yml, **/azure-pipelines*.yml, **/*.pipeline.yml'
---
# Azure DevOps Pipeline YAML Best Practices
Guidelines for creating maintainable, secure, and efficient Azure DevOps pipelines in PowerToys.
## General Guidelines
- Use YAML syntax consistently with proper indentation (2 spaces)
- Always include meaningful names and display names for pipelines, stages, jobs, and steps
- Implement proper error handling and conditional execution
- Use variables and parameters to make pipelines reusable and maintainable
- Follow the principle of least privilege for service connections and permissions
- Include comprehensive logging and diagnostics for troubleshooting
## Pipeline Structure
- Organize complex pipelines using stages for better visualization and control
- Use jobs to group related steps and enable parallel execution when possible
- Implement proper dependencies between stages and jobs
- Use templates for reusable pipeline components
- Keep pipeline files focused and modular - split large pipelines into multiple files
## Build Best Practices
- Use specific agent pool versions and VM images for consistency
- Cache dependencies (npm, NuGet, Maven, etc.) to improve build performance
- Implement proper artifact management with meaningful names and retention policies
- Use build variables for version numbers and build metadata
- Include code quality gates (lint checks, testing, security scans)
- Ensure builds are reproducible and environment-independent
## Testing Integration
- Run unit tests as part of the build process
- Publish test results in standard formats (JUnit, VSTest, etc.)
- Include code coverage reporting and quality gates
- Implement integration and end-to-end tests in appropriate stages
- Use test impact analysis when available to optimize test execution
- Fail fast on test failures to provide quick feedback
## Security Considerations
- Use Azure Key Vault for sensitive configuration and secrets
- Implement proper secret management with variable groups
- Use service connections with minimal required permissions
- Enable security scans (dependency vulnerabilities, static analysis)
- Implement approval gates for production deployments
- Use managed identities when possible instead of service principals
## Deployment Strategies
- Implement proper environment promotion (dev → staging → production)
- Use deployment jobs with proper environment targeting
- Implement blue-green or canary deployment strategies when appropriate
- Include rollback mechanisms and health checks
- Use infrastructure as code (ARM, Bicep, Terraform) for consistent deployments
- Implement proper configuration management per environment
## Variable and Parameter Management
- Use variable groups for shared configuration across pipelines
- Implement runtime parameters for flexible pipeline execution
- Use conditional variables based on branches or environments
- Secure sensitive variables and mark them as secrets
- Document variable purposes and expected values
- Use variable templates for complex variable logic
## Performance Optimization
- Use parallel jobs and matrix strategies when appropriate
- Implement proper caching strategies for dependencies and build outputs
- Use shallow clone for Git operations when full history isn't needed
- Optimize Docker image builds with multi-stage builds and layer caching
- Monitor pipeline performance and optimize bottlenecks
- Use pipeline resource triggers efficiently
## Monitoring and Observability
- Include comprehensive logging throughout the pipeline
- Use Azure Monitor and Application Insights for deployment tracking
- Implement proper notification strategies for failures and successes
- Include deployment health checks and automated rollback triggers
- Use pipeline analytics to identify improvement opportunities
- Document pipeline behavior and troubleshooting steps
## Template and Reusability
- Create pipeline templates for common patterns
- Use extends templates for complete pipeline inheritance
- Implement step templates for reusable task sequences
- Use variable templates for complex variable logic
- Version templates appropriately for stability
- Document template parameters and usage examples
## Branch and Trigger Strategy
- Implement appropriate triggers for different branch types
- Use path filters to trigger builds only when relevant files change
- Configure proper CI/CD triggers for main/master branches
- Use pull request triggers for code validation
- Implement scheduled triggers for maintenance tasks
- Consider resource triggers for multi-repository scenarios
## Example Structure
```yaml
# azure-pipelines.yml
trigger:
branches:
include:
- main
- develop
paths:
exclude:
- docs/*
- README.md
variables:
- group: shared-variables
- name: buildConfiguration
value: 'Release'
stages:
- stage: Build
displayName: 'Build and Test'
jobs:
- job: Build
displayName: 'Build Application'
pool:
vmImage: 'ubuntu-latest'
steps:
- task: UseDotNet@2
displayName: 'Use .NET SDK'
inputs:
version: '8.x'
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Restore dependencies'
inputs:
command: 'restore'
projects: '**/*.csproj'
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Build application'
inputs:
command: 'build'
projects: '**/*.csproj'
arguments: '--configuration $(buildConfiguration) --no-restore'
- stage: Deploy
displayName: 'Deploy to Staging'
dependsOn: Build
condition: and(succeeded(), eq(variables['Build.SourceBranch'], 'refs/heads/main'))
jobs:
- deployment: DeployToStaging
displayName: 'Deploy to Staging Environment'
environment: 'staging'
strategy:
runOnce:
deploy:
steps:
- download: current
displayName: 'Download drop artifact'
artifact: drop
- task: AzureWebApp@1
displayName: 'Deploy to Azure Web App'
inputs:
azureSubscription: 'staging-service-connection'
appType: 'webApp'
appName: 'myapp-staging'
package: '$(Pipeline.Workspace)/drop/**/*.zip'
```
## Common Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Hardcoding sensitive values directly in YAML files
- Using overly broad triggers that cause unnecessary builds
- Mixing build and deployment logic in a single stage
- Not implementing proper error handling and cleanup
- Using deprecated task versions without upgrade plans
- Creating monolithic pipelines that are difficult to maintain
- Not using proper naming conventions for clarity
- Ignoring pipeline security best practices
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for shared libraries including logging, IPC, settings, DPI, telemetry, and utilities consumed by multiple modules'
applyTo: 'src/common/**'
---
# Common Libraries Shared Code Guidance
Guidelines for modifying shared code in `src/common/`. Changes here can have wide-reaching impact across the entire PowerToys codebase.
## Scope
- Logging infrastructure (`src/common/logger/`)
- IPC primitives and named pipe utilities
- Settings serialization and management
- DPI awareness and scaling utilities
- Telemetry helpers
- General utilities (JSON parsing, string helpers, etc.)
## Guidelines
### API Stability
- Avoid breaking public headers/APIs; if changed, search & update all callers
- Coordinate ABI-impacting struct/class layout changes; keep binary compatibility
- When modifying public interfaces, grep the entire codebase for usages
### Performance
- Watch perf in hot paths (hooks, timers, serialization)
- Avoid avoidable allocations in frequently called code
- Profile changes that touch performance-sensitive areas
### Dependencies
- Ask before adding third-party deps or changing serialization formats
- New dependencies must be MIT-licensed or approved by PM team
- Add any new external packages to `NOTICE.md`
### Logging
- C++ logging uses spdlog (`Logger::info`, `Logger::warn`, `Logger::error`, `Logger::debug`)
- Initialize with `init_logger()` early in startup
- Keep hot paths quiet no logging in tight loops or hooks
## Acceptance Criteria
- No unintended ABI breaks
- No noisy logs in hot paths
- New non-obvious symbols briefly commented
- All callers updated when interfaces change
## Code Style
- **C++**: Follow `.clang-format` in `src/`; use Modern C++ patterns per C++ Core Guidelines
- **C#**: Follow `src/.editorconfig`; enforce StyleCop.Analyzers
## Validation
- Build: `tools\build\build.cmd` from `src/common/` folder
- Verify no ABI breaks: grep for changed function/struct names across codebase
- Check logs: ensure no new logging in performance-critical paths
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality custom instruction files for GitHub Copilot'
applyTo: '**/*.instructions.md'
---
# Custom Instructions File Guidelines
Instructions for creating effective and maintainable custom instruction files that guide GitHub Copilot in generating domain-specific code and following project conventions.
## Project Context
- Target audience: Developers and GitHub Copilot working with domain-specific code
- File format: Markdown with YAML frontmatter
- File naming convention: lowercase with hyphens (e.g., `react-best-practices.instructions.md`)
- Location: `.github/instructions/` directory
- Purpose: Provide context-aware guidance for code generation, review, and documentation
## Required Frontmatter
Every instruction file must include YAML frontmatter with the following fields:
```yaml
---
description: 'Brief description of the instruction purpose and scope'
applyTo: 'glob pattern for target files (e.g., **/*.ts, **/*.py)'
---
```
### Frontmatter Guidelines
- **description**: Single-quoted string, 1-500 characters, clearly stating the purpose
- **applyTo**: Glob pattern(s) specifying which files these instructions apply to
- Single pattern: `'**/*.ts'`
- Multiple patterns: `'**/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js'`
- Specific files: `'src/**/*.py'`
- All files: `'**'`
## File Structure
A well-structured instruction file should include the following sections:
### 1. Title and Overview
- Clear, descriptive title using `#` heading
- Brief introduction explaining the purpose and scope
- Optional: Project context section with key technologies and versions
### 2. Core Sections
Organize content into logical sections based on the domain:
- **General Instructions**: High-level guidelines and principles
- **Best Practices**: Recommended patterns and approaches
- **Code Standards**: Naming conventions, formatting, style rules
- **Architecture/Structure**: Project organization and design patterns
- **Common Patterns**: Frequently used implementations
- **Security**: Security considerations (if applicable)
- **Performance**: Optimization guidelines (if applicable)
- **Testing**: Testing standards and approaches (if applicable)
### 3. Examples and Code Snippets
Provide concrete examples with clear labels:
```markdown
### Good Example
\`\`\`language
// Recommended approach
code example here
\`\`\`
### Bad Example
\`\`\`language
// Avoid this pattern
code example here
\`\`\`
```
### 4. Validation and Verification (Optional but Recommended)
- Build commands to verify code
- Lint checks and formatting tools
- Testing requirements
- Verification steps
## Content Guidelines
### Writing Style
- Use clear, concise language
- Write in imperative mood ("Use", "Implement", "Avoid")
- Be specific and actionable
- Avoid ambiguous terms like "should", "might", "possibly"
- Use bullet points and lists for readability
- Keep sections focused and scannable
### Best Practices
- **Be Specific**: Provide concrete examples rather than abstract concepts
- **Show Why**: Explain the reasoning behind recommendations when it adds value
- **Use Tables**: For comparing options, listing rules, or showing patterns
- **Include Examples**: Real code snippets are more effective than descriptions
- **Stay Current**: Reference current versions and best practices
- **Link Resources**: Include official documentation and authoritative sources
### Common Patterns to Include
1. **Naming Conventions**: How to name variables, functions, classes, files
2. **Code Organization**: File structure, module organization, import order
3. **Error Handling**: Preferred error handling patterns
4. **Dependencies**: How to manage and document dependencies
5. **Comments and Documentation**: When and how to document code
6. **Version Information**: Target language/framework versions
## Patterns to Follow
### Bullet Points and Lists
```markdown
## Security Best Practices
- Always validate user input before processing
- Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection
- Store secrets in environment variables, never in code
- Implement proper authentication and authorization
- Enable HTTPS for all production endpoints
```
### Tables for Structured Information
```markdown
## Common Issues
| Issue | Solution | Example |
| ---------------- | ------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Magic numbers | Use named constants | `const MAX_RETRIES = 3` |
| Deep nesting | Extract functions | Refactor nested if statements |
| Hardcoded values | Use configuration | Store API URLs in config |
```
### Code Comparison
```markdown
### Good Example - Using TypeScript interfaces
\`\`\`typescript
interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
email: string;
}
function getUser(id: string): User {
// Implementation
}
\`\`\`
### Bad Example - Using any type
\`\`\`typescript
function getUser(id: any): any {
// Loses type safety
}
\`\`\`
```
### Conditional Guidance
```markdown
## Framework Selection
- **For small projects**: Use Minimal API approach
- **For large projects**: Use controller-based architecture with clear separation
- **For microservices**: Consider domain-driven design patterns
```
## Patterns to Avoid
- **Overly verbose explanations**: Keep it concise and scannable
- **Outdated information**: Always reference current versions and practices
- **Ambiguous guidelines**: Be specific about what to do or avoid
- **Missing examples**: Abstract rules without concrete code examples
- **Contradictory advice**: Ensure consistency throughout the file
- **Copy-paste from documentation**: Add value by distilling and providing context
## Testing Your Instructions
Before finalizing instruction files:
1. **Test with Copilot**: Try the instructions with actual prompts in VS Code
2. **Verify Examples**: Ensure code examples are correct and run without errors
3. **Check Glob Patterns**: Confirm `applyTo` patterns match intended files
## Example Structure
Here's a minimal example structure for a new instruction file:
```markdown
---
description: 'Brief description of purpose'
applyTo: '**/*.ext'
---
# Technology Name Development
Brief introduction and context.
## General Instructions
- High-level guideline 1
- High-level guideline 2
## Best Practices
- Specific practice 1
- Specific practice 2
## Code Standards
### Naming Conventions
- Rule 1
- Rule 2
### File Organization
- Structure 1
- Structure 2
## Common Patterns
### Pattern 1
Description and example
\`\`\`language
code example
\`\`\`
### Pattern 2
Description and example
## Validation
- Build command: `command to verify`
- Lint checks: `command to lint`
- Testing: `command to test`
```
## Maintenance
- Review instructions when dependencies or frameworks are updated
- Update examples to reflect current best practices
- Remove outdated patterns or deprecated features
- Add new patterns as they emerge in the community
- Keep glob patterns accurate as project structure evolves
## Additional Resources
- [Custom Instructions Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/custom-instructions)
- [Awesome Copilot Instructions](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/instructions)
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for creating high-quality prompt files for GitHub Copilot'
applyTo: '**/*.prompt.md'
---
# Copilot Prompt Files Guidelines
Instructions for creating effective and maintainable prompt files that guide GitHub Copilot in delivering consistent, high-quality outcomes across any repository.
## Scope and Principles
- Target audience: maintainers and contributors authoring reusable prompts for Copilot Chat.
- Goals: predictable behaviour, clear expectations, minimal permissions, and portability across repositories.
- Primary references: VS Code documentation on prompt files and organization-specific conventions.
## Frontmatter Requirements
Every prompt file should include YAML frontmatter with the following fields:
### Required/Recommended Fields
| Field | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| `description` | Recommended | A short description of the prompt (single sentence, actionable outcome) |
| `name` | Optional | The name shown after typing `/` in chat. Defaults to filename if not specified |
| `agent` | Recommended | The agent to use: `ask`, `edit`, `agent`, or a custom agent name. Defaults to current agent |
| `model` | Optional | The language model to use. Defaults to currently selected model |
| `tools` | Optional | List of tool/tool set names available for this prompt |
| `argument-hint` | Optional | Hint text shown in chat input to guide user interaction |
### Guidelines
- Use consistent quoting (single quotes recommended) and keep one field per line for readability and version control clarity
- If `tools` are specified and current agent is `ask` or `edit`, the default agent becomes `agent`
- Preserve any additional metadata (`language`, `tags`, `visibility`, etc.) required by your organization
## File Naming and Placement
- Use kebab-case filenames ending with `.prompt.md` and store them under `.github/prompts/` unless your workspace standard specifies another directory.
- Provide a short filename that communicates the action (for example, `generate-readme.prompt.md` rather than `prompt1.prompt.md`).
## Body Structure
- Start with an `#` level heading that matches the prompt intent so it surfaces well in Quick Pick search.
- Organize content with predictable sections. Recommended baseline: `Mission` or `Primary Directive`, `Scope & Preconditions`, `Inputs`, `Workflow` (step-by-step), `Output Expectations`, and `Quality Assurance`.
- Adjust section names to fit the domain, but retain the logical flow: why → context → inputs → actions → outputs → validation.
- Reference related prompts or instruction files using relative links to aid discoverability.
## Input and Context Handling
- Use `${input:variableName[:placeholder]}` for required values and explain when the user must supply them. Provide defaults or alternatives where possible.
- Call out contextual variables such as `${selection}`, `${file}`, `${workspaceFolder}` only when they are essential, and describe how Copilot should interpret them.
- Document how to proceed when mandatory context is missing (for example, “Request the file path and stop if it remains undefined”).
## Tool and Permission Guidance
- Limit `tools` to the smallest set that enables the task. List them in the preferred execution order when the sequence matters.
- If the prompt inherits tools from a chat mode, mention that relationship and state any critical tool behaviours or side effects.
- Warn about destructive operations (file creation, edits, terminal commands) and include guard rails or confirmation steps in the workflow.
## Instruction Tone and Style
- Write in direct, imperative sentences targeted at Copilot (for example, “Analyze”, “Generate”, “Summarize”).
- Keep sentences short and unambiguous, following Google Developer Documentation translation best practices to support localization.
- Avoid idioms, humor, or culturally specific references; favor neutral, inclusive language.
## Output Definition
- Specify the format, structure, and location of expected results (for example, “Create an architecture decision record file using the template below, such as `docs/architecture-decisions/record-XXXX.md`).
- Include success criteria and failure triggers so Copilot knows when to halt or retry.
- Provide validation steps—manual checks, automated commands, or acceptance criteria lists—that reviewers can execute after running the prompt.
## Examples and Reusable Assets
- Embed Good/Bad examples or scaffolds (Markdown templates, JSON stubs) that the prompt should produce or follow.
- Maintain reference tables (capabilities, status codes, role descriptions) inline to keep the prompt self-contained. Update these tables when upstream resources change.
- Link to authoritative documentation instead of duplicating lengthy guidance.
## Quality Assurance Checklist
- [ ] Frontmatter fields are complete, accurate, and least-privilege.
- [ ] Inputs include placeholders, default behaviours, and fallbacks.
- [ ] Workflow covers preparation, execution, and post-processing without gaps.
- [ ] Output expectations include formatting and storage details.
- [ ] Validation steps are actionable (commands, diff checks, review prompts).
- [ ] Security, compliance, and privacy policies referenced by the prompt are current.
- [ ] Prompt executes successfully in VS Code (`Chat: Run Prompt`) using representative scenarios.
## Maintenance Guidance
- Version-control prompts alongside the code they affect; update them when dependencies, tooling, or review processes change.
- Review prompts periodically to ensure tool lists, model requirements, and linked documents remain valid.
- Coordinate with other repositories: when a prompt proves broadly useful, extract common guidance into instruction files or shared prompt packs.
## Additional Resources
- [Prompt Files Documentation](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/customization/prompt-files#_prompt-file-format)
- [Awesome Copilot Prompt Files](https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/prompts)
- [Tool Configuration](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/chat/chat-agent-mode#_agent-mode-tools)
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
description: 'Guidelines for Runner and Settings UI components that communicate via named pipes and manage module lifecycle'
applyTo: 'src/runner/**,src/settings-ui/**'
---
# Runner & Settings UI Core Components Guidance
Guidelines for modifying the Runner (tray/module loader) and Settings UI (configuration app). These components communicate via Windows Named Pipes using JSON messages.
## Runner (`src/runner/`)
### Scope
- Module bootstrap, hotkey management, settings bridge, update/elevation handling
### Guidelines
- If IPC/JSON contracts change, mirror updates in `src/settings-ui/**`
- Keep module discovery in `src/runner/main.cpp` in sync when adding/removing modules
- Keep startup lean: avoid blocking/network calls in early init path
- Preserve GPO & elevation behaviors; confirm no regression in policy handling
- Ask before modifying update workflow or elevation logic
### Acceptance Criteria
- Stable startup, consistent contracts, no unnecessary logging noise
## Settings UI (`src/settings-ui/`)
### Scope
- WinUI/WPF UI, communicates with Runner over named pipes; manages persisted settings schema
### Guidelines
- Don't break settings schema silently; add migration when shape changes
- If IPC/JSON contracts change, align with `src/runner/**` implementation
- Keep UI responsive: marshal to UI thread for UI-bound operations
- Reuse existing styles/resources; avoid duplicate theme keys
- Add/adjust migration or serialization tests when changing persisted settings
### Acceptance Criteria
- Schema integrity preserved, responsive UI, consistent contracts, no style duplication
## Shared Concerns
### IPC Contract Changes
When modifying the JSON message format between Runner and Settings UI:
1. Update both `src/runner/` and `src/settings-ui/` in the same PR
2. Preserve backward compatibility where possible
3. Add migration logic for settings schema changes
4. Test both directions of communication
### Code Style
- **C++ (Runner)**: Follow `.clang-format` in `src/`
- **C# (Settings UI)**: Follow `src/.editorconfig`, use StyleCop.Analyzers
- **XAML**: Use XamlStyler or run `.\.pipelines\applyXamlStyling.ps1 -Main`
## Validation
- Build Runner: `tools\build\build.cmd` from `src/runner/`
- Build Settings UI: `tools\build\build.cmd` from `src/settings-ui/`
- Test IPC: Launch both Runner and Settings UI, verify communication works
- Schema changes: Run serialization tests if settings shape changed
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
---
description: 'Instructions for building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using the TypeScript SDK'
applyTo: '**/*.ts, **/*.js, **/package.json'
---
# TypeScript MCP Server Development
## Instructions
- Use the **@modelcontextprotocol/sdk** npm package: `npm install @modelcontextprotocol/sdk`
- Import from specific paths: `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js`, `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js`, etc.
- Use `McpServer` class for high-level server implementation with automatic protocol handling
- Use `Server` class for low-level control with manual request handlers
- Use **zod** for input/output schema validation: `npm install zod@3`
- Always provide `title` field for tools, resources, and prompts for better UI display
- Use `registerTool()`, `registerResource()`, and `registerPrompt()` methods (recommended over older APIs)
- Define schemas using zod: `{ inputSchema: { param: z.string() }, outputSchema: { result: z.string() } }`
- Return both `content` (for display) and `structuredContent` (for structured data) from tools
- For HTTP servers, use `StreamableHTTPServerTransport` with Express or similar frameworks
- For local integrations, use `StdioServerTransport` for stdio-based communication
- Create new transport instances per request to prevent request ID collisions (stateless mode)
- Use session management with `sessionIdGenerator` for stateful servers
- Enable DNS rebinding protection for local servers: `enableDnsRebindingProtection: true`
- Configure CORS headers and expose `Mcp-Session-Id` for browser-based clients
- Use `ResourceTemplate` for dynamic resources with URI parameters: `new ResourceTemplate('resource://{param}', { list: undefined })`
- Support completions for better UX using `completable()` wrapper from `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/completable.js`
- Implement sampling with `server.server.createMessage()` to request LLM completions from clients
- Use `server.server.elicitInput()` to request additional user input during tool execution
- Enable notification debouncing for bulk updates: `debouncedNotificationMethods: ['notifications/tools/list_changed']`
- Dynamic updates: call `.enable()`, `.disable()`, `.update()`, or `.remove()` on registered items to emit `listChanged` notifications
- Use `getDisplayName()` from `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/shared/metadataUtils.js` for UI display names
- Test servers with MCP Inspector: `npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector`
## Best Practices
- Keep tool implementations focused on single responsibilities
- Provide clear, descriptive titles and descriptions for LLM understanding
- Use proper TypeScript types for all parameters and return values
- Implement comprehensive error handling with try-catch blocks
- Return `isError: true` in tool results for error conditions
- Use async/await for all asynchronous operations
- Close database connections and clean up resources properly
- Validate input parameters before processing
- Use structured logging for debugging without polluting stdout/stderr
- Consider security implications when exposing file system or network access
- Implement proper resource cleanup on transport close events
- Use environment variables for configuration (ports, API keys, etc.)
- Document tool capabilities and limitations clearly
- Test with multiple clients to ensure compatibility
## Common Patterns
### Basic Server Setup (HTTP)
```typescript
import { McpServer } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StreamableHTTPServerTransport } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/streamableHttp.js';
import express from 'express';
const server = new McpServer({
name: 'my-server',
version: '1.0.0'
});
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.post('/mcp', async (req, res) => {
const transport = new StreamableHTTPServerTransport({
sessionIdGenerator: undefined,
enableJsonResponse: true
});
res.on('close', () => transport.close());
await server.connect(transport);
await transport.handleRequest(req, res, req.body);
});
app.listen(3000);
```
### Basic Server Setup (stdio)
```typescript
import { McpServer } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js';
const server = new McpServer({
name: 'my-server',
version: '1.0.0'
});
// ... register tools, resources, prompts ...
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
await server.connect(transport);
```
### Simple Tool
```typescript
import { z } from 'zod';
server.registerTool(
'calculate',
{
title: 'Calculator',
description: 'Perform basic calculations',
inputSchema: { a: z.number(), b: z.number(), op: z.enum(['+', '-', '*', '/']) },
outputSchema: { result: z.number() }
},
async ({ a, b, op }) => {
const result = op === '+' ? a + b : op === '-' ? a - b :
op === '*' ? a * b : a / b;
const output = { result };
return {
content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(output) }],
structuredContent: output
};
}
);
```
### Dynamic Resource
```typescript
import { ResourceTemplate } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/mcp.js';
server.registerResource(
'user',
new ResourceTemplate('users://{userId}', { list: undefined }),
{
title: 'User Profile',
description: 'Fetch user profile data'
},
async (uri, { userId }) => ({
contents: [{
uri: uri.href,
text: `User ${userId} data here`
}]
})
);
```
### Tool with Sampling
```typescript
server.registerTool(
'summarize',
{
title: 'Text Summarizer',
description: 'Summarize text using LLM',
inputSchema: { text: z.string() },
outputSchema: { summary: z.string() }
},
async ({ text }) => {
const response = await server.server.createMessage({
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: { type: 'text', text: `Summarize: ${text}` }
}],
maxTokens: 500
});
const summary = response.content.type === 'text' ?
response.content.text : 'Unable to summarize';
const output = { summary };
return {
content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(output) }],
structuredContent: output
};
}
);
```
### Prompt with Completion
```typescript
import { completable } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/completable.js';
server.registerPrompt(
'review',
{
title: 'Code Review',
description: 'Review code with specific focus',
argsSchema: {
language: completable(z.string(), value =>
['typescript', 'python', 'javascript', 'java']
.filter(l => l.startsWith(value))
),
code: z.string()
}
},
({ language, code }) => ({
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: {
type: 'text',
text: `Review this ${language} code:\n\n${code}`
}
}]
})
);
```
### Error Handling
```typescript
server.registerTool(
'risky-operation',
{
title: 'Risky Operation',
description: 'An operation that might fail',
inputSchema: { input: z.string() },
outputSchema: { result: z.string() }
},
async ({ input }) => {
try {
const result = await performRiskyOperation(input);
const output = { result };
return {
content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(output) }],
structuredContent: output
};
} catch (err: unknown) {
const error = err as Error;
return {
content: [{ type: 'text', text: `Error: ${error.message}` }],
isError: true
};
}
}
);
```