chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
govulncheck / govulncheck (push) Waiting to run
Harness (E2E) / Harnesses (mock LLM) (push) Waiting to run
Harness (E2E) / Provider harnesses (live LLM conformance) (push) Waiting to run
Lint / golangci-lint (push) Waiting to run
Run Tests / Unit Tests (push) Waiting to run
Run Tests / Etcd Integration Tests (push) Waiting to run
govulncheck / govulncheck (push) Waiting to run
Harness (E2E) / Harnesses (mock LLM) (push) Waiting to run
Harness (E2E) / Provider harnesses (live LLM conformance) (push) Waiting to run
Lint / golangci-lint (push) Waiting to run
Run Tests / Unit Tests (push) Waiting to run
Run Tests / Etcd Integration Tests (push) Waiting to run
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
||||
// Agentic Loop — keep working until the goal is met, with a guaranteed ceiling
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The "loop" pattern from agentic AI: instead of one shot, run a step over
|
||||
// and over until the goal is reached, letting it decide when to stop — but
|
||||
// always bounded by a hard iteration cap (the guardrail) so it can never run
|
||||
// away, or run up an unbounded bill.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// flow.Loop is just a flow step, so it composes with the normal checkpointed
|
||||
// step engine. This example needs no LLM key: the body is a plain func that
|
||||
// "improves a draft" each pass, and a code-defined Until stops it once the
|
||||
// draft is good enough — capped by FlowLoopMax. In a real flow the body would
|
||||
// be micro.FlowDispatch("coder") (an agent) or micro.FlowLLM(...), and the
|
||||
// stop check micro.FlowUntilLLM("Is the work complete?") — the supervised
|
||||
// "Ralph" loop, where the model decides it's done but the cap still bounds it.
|
||||
package main
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
|
||||
"go-micro.dev/v6"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// Draft is the payload carried across iterations via State.Set / State.Scan.
|
||||
type Draft struct {
|
||||
Text string `json:"text"`
|
||||
Quality int `json:"quality"` // 0..100, improved each pass
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// improve is one loop pass: it refines the draft a bit. In a real flow this
|
||||
// would be an agent or an LLM turn; here it's deterministic so the example
|
||||
// runs offline.
|
||||
func improve(_ context.Context, in micro.FlowState) (micro.FlowState, error) {
|
||||
var d Draft
|
||||
_ = in.Scan(&d)
|
||||
d.Quality += 30
|
||||
d.Text = fmt.Sprintf("draft refined (quality %d)", d.Quality)
|
||||
return in, in.Set(d)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func main() {
|
||||
const goodEnough = 90
|
||||
|
||||
f := micro.NewFlow("refine",
|
||||
micro.FlowSteps(
|
||||
micro.FlowStep{Name: "improve", Run: micro.FlowLoop(
|
||||
improve,
|
||||
// Stop early once the draft is good enough...
|
||||
micro.FlowUntil(func(_ context.Context, s micro.FlowState, iter int) (bool, error) {
|
||||
var d Draft
|
||||
_ = s.Scan(&d)
|
||||
fmt.Printf(" pass %d → quality %d\n", iter, d.Quality)
|
||||
return d.Quality >= goodEnough, nil
|
||||
}),
|
||||
// ...but never run the body more than 10 times (the ceiling).
|
||||
micro.FlowLoopMax(10),
|
||||
)},
|
||||
),
|
||||
micro.FlowDeleteOnSuccess(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
fmt.Println("refining until quality >=", goodEnough)
|
||||
if err := f.Execute(context.Background(), `{"text":"initial draft","quality":0}`); err != nil {
|
||||
fmt.Println("flow error:", err)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, r := range f.Results() {
|
||||
fmt.Printf("\ndone: %s\n", r.Answer)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user