chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
|
||||
# Backward compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
## Policy Normalization Migration (PR #1452)
|
||||
|
||||
**Breaking Change**: LeRobot policies no longer have built-in normalization layers embedded in their weights. Normalization is now handled by external `PolicyProcessorPipeline` components.
|
||||
|
||||
### What changed?
|
||||
|
||||
| | Before PR #1452 | After PR #1452 |
|
||||
| -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| **Normalization Location** | Embedded in model weights (`normalize_inputs.*`) | External `PolicyProcessorPipeline` components |
|
||||
| **Model State Dict** | Contains normalization statistics | **Clean weights only** - no normalization parameters |
|
||||
| **Usage** | `policy(batch)` handles everything | `preprocessor(batch)` → `policy(...)` → `postprocessor(...)` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Impact on existing models
|
||||
|
||||
- Models trained **before** PR #1452 have normalization embedded in their weights
|
||||
- These models need migration to work with the new `PolicyProcessorPipeline` system
|
||||
- The migration extracts normalization statistics and creates separate processor pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
### Migrating old models
|
||||
|
||||
Use the migration script to convert models with embedded normalization:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
python src/lerobot/processor/migrate_policy_normalization.py \
|
||||
--pretrained-path lerobot/act_aloha_sim_transfer_cube_human \
|
||||
--push-to-hub \
|
||||
--branch migrated
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The script:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Extracts** normalization statistics from model weights
|
||||
2. **Creates** external preprocessor and postprocessor pipelines
|
||||
3. **Removes** normalization layers from model weights
|
||||
4. **Saves** clean model + processor pipelines
|
||||
5. **Pushes** to Hub with automatic PR creation
|
||||
|
||||
### Using migrated models
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# New usage pattern (after migration)
|
||||
from lerobot.policies import make_policy, make_pre_post_processors
|
||||
|
||||
# Load model and processors separately
|
||||
policy = make_policy(config, ds_meta=dataset.meta)
|
||||
preprocessor, postprocessor = make_pre_post_processors(
|
||||
policy_cfg=config,
|
||||
dataset_stats=dataset.meta.stats
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Process data through pipeline
|
||||
processed_batch = preprocessor(raw_batch)
|
||||
action = policy.select_action(processed_batch)
|
||||
final_action = postprocessor(action)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Hardware API redesign
|
||||
|
||||
PR [#777](https://github.com/huggingface/lerobot/pull/777) improves the LeRobot calibration but is **not backward-compatible**. Below is a overview of what changed and how you can continue to work with datasets created before this pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
### What changed?
|
||||
|
||||
| | Before PR #777 | After PR #777 |
|
||||
| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| **Joint range** | Degrees `-180...180°` | **Normalised range** Joints: `–100...100` Gripper: `0...100` |
|
||||
| **Zero position (SO100 / SO101)** | Arm fully extended horizontally | **In middle of the range for each joint** |
|
||||
| **Boundary handling** | Software safeguards to detect ±180 ° wrap-arounds | No wrap-around logic needed due to mid-range zero |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Impact on existing datasets
|
||||
|
||||
- Recorded trajectories created **before** PR #777 will replay incorrectly if loaded directly:
|
||||
- Joint angles are offset and incorrectly normalized.
|
||||
- Any models directly finetuned or trained on the old data will need their inputs and outputs converted.
|
||||
|
||||
### Using datasets made with the previous calibration system
|
||||
|
||||
We provide a migration example script for replaying an episode recorded with the previous calibration here: `examples/backward_compatibility/replay.py`.
|
||||
Below we take you through the modifications that are done in the example script to make the previous calibration datasets work.
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
+ key = f"{name.removeprefix('main_')}.pos"
|
||||
action[key] = action_array[i].item()
|
||||
+ action["shoulder_lift.pos"] = -(action["shoulder_lift.pos"] - 90)
|
||||
+ action["elbow_flex.pos"] -= 90
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Let's break this down.
|
||||
New codebase uses `.pos` suffix for the position observations and we have removed `main_` prefix:
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
|
||||
```python
|
||||
key = f"{name.removeprefix('main_')}.pos"
|
||||
```
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-end -->
|
||||
|
||||
For `"shoulder_lift"` (id = 2), the 0 position is changed by -90 degrees and the direction is reversed compared to old calibration/code.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
|
||||
```python
|
||||
action["shoulder_lift.pos"] = -(action["shoulder_lift.pos"] - 90)
|
||||
```
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-end -->
|
||||
|
||||
For `"elbow_flex"` (id = 3), the 0 position is changed by -90 degrees compared to old calibration/code.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
|
||||
```python
|
||||
action["elbow_flex.pos"] -= 90
|
||||
```
|
||||
<!-- prettier-ignore-end -->
|
||||
|
||||
To use degrees normalization we then set the `--robot.use_degrees` option to `true`.
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
python examples/backward_compatibility/replay.py \
|
||||
--robot.type=so101_follower \
|
||||
--robot.port=/dev/tty.usbmodem5A460814411 \
|
||||
--robot.id=blue \
|
||||
+ --robot.use_degrees=true \
|
||||
--dataset.repo_id=my_dataset_id \
|
||||
--dataset.episode=0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Using policies trained with the previous calibration system
|
||||
|
||||
Policies output actions in the same format as the datasets (`torch.Tensors`). Therefore, the same transformations should be applied.
|
||||
|
||||
To find these transformations, we recommend to first try and and replay an episode of the dataset your policy was trained on using the section above.
|
||||
Then, add these same transformations on your inference script (shown here in the `record.py` script):
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
action_values = predict_action(
|
||||
observation_frame,
|
||||
policy,
|
||||
get_safe_torch_device(policy.config.device),
|
||||
policy.config.use_amp,
|
||||
task=single_task,
|
||||
robot_type=robot.robot_type,
|
||||
)
|
||||
action = {key: action_values[i].item() for i, key in enumerate(robot.action_features)}
|
||||
|
||||
+ action["shoulder_lift.pos"] = -(action["shoulder_lift.pos"] - 90)
|
||||
+ action["elbow_flex.pos"] -= 90
|
||||
robot.send_action(action)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If you have questions or run into migration issues, feel free to ask them on [Discord](https://discord.gg/s3KuuzsPFb)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user