wehub-resource-sync
85453da49f
3.3 KiB
Story spine — value-first narrative doctrine
Applies to the narrated, story-driven creation workflows — /product-launch-video, /pr-to-video, /faceless-explainer, /website-to-video, and /general-video when the piece tells a story. It does not apply to /music-to-video (the track drives the arc), /motion-graphics (no narration — motion is the message), /embedded-captions and /talking-head-recut (the footage's story is already fixed), or /slideshow (the presenter owns the story). Do not force these rules onto an exempt workflow.
Each workflow's own story-design reference owns its archetypes, beat sequences, and frame vocabulary. This file owns three cross-workflow rules about order and justification — the reverse iceberg: lead with why it's valuable, not with what it is or how it was made.
1. The hook speaks the viewer's language
The first beat answers "why should I care" in outcome language — what the viewer gains, avoids, or finally understands. Subject-internal vocabulary is banned in the hook: file / function / API names for a code change; a feature list for a product; the source article's section headings for an explainer. Numbers are welcome only when they carry stakes ("40% faster cold starts"), never inventory ("23 files changed").
2. Reverse iceberg — value before evidence
The value claim (the brief's message) lands by the second beat. Everything after it is evidence in service of that claim — the diff, the mechanism, the feature demo, the site's screenshots. Implementation is the footnote of the story, not the spine.
Self-check on the finished beat list:
- Delete every evidence beat — the remaining beats must still state the value on their own.
- Delete the value beats — if the video still seems to work, it was a feature tour / diff readout, not a story.
Structure is value-first; the voice stays whatever the workflow prescribes (a PR video keeps its plain, no-hype developer voice — leading with value is an ordering decision, not a marketing register).
3. The storyboard is a proposal, not a listing
When Step 3 presents the plan (a checkpoint gate — hyperframes-core/references/brief-contract.md § 1):
-
Open by echoing the strategy line: "This video tells [audience] that [message]."
-
Present the frames as a markdown table, one row per frame:
Frame Beat On screen Why 01 — Not anymore hook · 9s States the old pain and resolves it in the same breath. Lands the value claim in beat 1 Why is the frame's job in the story (from its
narrativeRole), traced back to the message — a frame whose why cannot be traced to the message is a frame to cut, not to decorate. -
Recommendations keep their receipts (brief-contract § 3): the archetype choice, the beat count, and any beat the user might question each state their basis.
The proposal shape — echo line → frame table → style / duration footer → "approve or adjust" — is the cheapest place to iterate: a frame change here costs 30 seconds; the same change after build costs minutes.