5.6 KiB
Decoder-Only Transformer
This repo implements a GPT-style decoder-only Transformer. "Decoder-only" means:
- the model reads a single token sequence;
- each position can attend only to previous positions;
- the output at every position is a distribution over the next token.
It is the right architecture for autoregressive language modeling:
[ p_\theta(x_t \mid x_{<t}) ]
The forward pass
flowchart TD
IDS["token ids (B, T)"] --> TOK["token embedding (B, T, C)"]
IDS --> POS["position ids 0..T-1"]
POS --> PE["position embedding (T, C)"]
TOK --> SUM["token + position"]
PE --> SUM
SUM --> B1["Block 1"]
B1 --> B2["Block 2"]
B2 --> BN["... N blocks"]
BN --> LN["final LayerNorm"]
LN --> HEAD["lm_head Linear(C -> vocab)"]
HEAD --> LOGITS["logits (B, T, V)"]
The implementation is in src/models/transformer.py:
self.token_embed = nn.Embedding(vocab_size, n_embed)
self.position_embed = nn.Embedding(context_length, n_embed)
self.attn_blocks = nn.ModuleList([
Block(n_head, n_embed, context_length) for _ in range(N_BLOCKS)
])
self.layer_norm = nn.LayerNorm(n_embed)
self.lm_head = nn.Linear(n_embed, vocab_size)
Shape symbols used throughout the docs:
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
B |
batch size |
T |
sequence length / context length |
C |
embedding width, n_embed |
H |
number of attention heads |
D |
head width, usually C / H |
V |
vocabulary size |
Embeddings
Token ids are categorical. The embedding table is a learned lookup:
[ E_{\text{tok}} \in \mathbb{R}^{V \times C} ]
For token id (x_t), the token vector is:
[ e_t = E_{\text{tok}}[x_t] ]
The model also learns absolute position embeddings:
[ E_{\text{pos}} \in \mathbb{R}^{T_{\max} \times C} ]
The input to the first block is:
[ h_t^{(0)} = E_{\text{tok}}[x_t] + E_{\text{pos}}[t] ]
In code:
tok_embedding = self.token_embed(idx)
pos_embedding = self.position_embed(self.pos_idxs[:T])
return tok_embedding + pos_embedding
The position embedding is necessary because attention alone is permutation-equivariant: without position information, the model would not know whether a token occurred first, last, or in the middle.
Transformer block
Each block in src/models/transformer_block.py uses pre-norm residual structure:
x = x + self.attn(self.ln1(x))
x = x + self.mlp(self.ln2(x))
Mathematically:
[ u = x + \text{MHA}(\text{LN}(x)) ]
[ y = u + \text{MLP}(\text{LN}(u)) ]
This gives each block two jobs:
- attention moves information across token positions;
- the MLP transforms each position independently.
Why residual connections matter
A residual block learns an update, not a full replacement:
[ y = x + f(x) ]
If a layer is not useful yet, it can learn a small update and let information pass through. This makes deep stacks trainable because gradients have a direct path backward through the addition.
Why LayerNorm appears before sublayers
LayerNorm normalizes each token vector across its feature dimension:
[ \text{LN}(x) = \gamma \odot \frac{x - \mu}{\sqrt{\sigma^2 + \epsilon}} + \beta ]
For a token vector (x \in \mathbb{R}^{C}):
[ \mu = \frac{1}{C} \sum_{i=1}^{C} x_i ]
[ \sigma^2 = \frac{1}{C} \sum_{i=1}^{C} (x_i - \mu)^2 ]
This repo uses pre-norm (LN -> sublayer -> residual) instead of post-norm (sublayer -> residual -> LN). Pre-norm is common in GPT-like models because it tends to make deeper stacks easier to optimize.
MLP / feed-forward network
The block MLP in src/models/mlp.py is:
self.hidden = nn.Linear(n_embed, 4 * n_embed)
self.relu = nn.ReLU()
self.proj = nn.Linear(4 * n_embed, n_embed)
For each position independently:
[ \text{MLP}(x) = W_2 , \text{ReLU}(W_1 x + b_1) + b_2 ]
where:
- (W_1) expands from (C) to (4C);
- (W_2) projects from (4C) back to (C).
Attention lets tokens communicate. The MLP gives each token vector nonlinear compute after that communication.
Logits and the language-model head
After the final block and final norm:
[ z_t = W_{\text{lm}} h_t + b_{\text{lm}} ]
The result (z_t \in \mathbb{R}^{V}) is a vector of logits: one unnormalized score per token in the vocabulary.
The probability distribution comes from softmax:
[ p_\theta(x_{t+1}=i \mid x_{\leq t}) = \frac{\exp(z_{t,i})}{\sum_{j=1}^{V}\exp(z_{t,j})} ]
Parameter count intuition
Ignoring biases and norms, a rough per-block parameter estimate is:
[ \text{attention} \approx 4C^2 ]
because Q, K, V, and the output projection are each (C \times C).
[ \text{MLP} \approx 8C^2 ]
because (C \to 4C) and (4C \to C).
So each block is roughly:
[ 12C^2 ]
The embedding and LM head add:
[ V C + C V ]
This repo does not tie token embeddings and output embeddings, so the input embedding and lm_head
are separate parameter matrices.
Repo-specific architecture notes
| Choice | Repo implementation | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute learned positions | nn.Embedding(context_length, n_embed) |
Simple and readable; fixed max context. |
| Causal attention mask | lower-triangular buffer in each head | Prevents future-token leakage. |
| MLP activation | ReLU | Educationally simple; many production GPT models use GELU/SwiGLU variants. |
| Dropout | not present in base modules | Less code noise; regularization comes mostly from data and optimizer choices. |
| Weight tying | not used | Easier to read; more parameters than tied embeddings. |
| Post-training heads | use forward_hidden |
Reward/value heads reuse the same backbone. |
Next
The most important sublayer is attention. Continue to Attention, Masks & Heads.