Files
2026-07-13 12:20:01 +08:00

1.5 KiB

autofix_class rubric (personas)

autofix_class describes the intrinsic shape of follow-up work — it is signal, not an apply gate or permission. In mode:agent the caller interprets findings and owns apply; in default (interactive) mode the review applies safe fixes itself by judgment (SKILL.md Stage 5c). Either way the class informs what to do first and what to flag — it does not mechanically decide what gets applied.

autofix_class Meaning
gated_auto A concrete change is proposed in suggested_fix. Callers may apply after their own judgment.
manual Actionable work that needs design input or a decision before code changes. Include suggested_fix when you can propose a defensible default.
advisory Report-only — learnings, residual risk, rollout notes.

Persona guidance

  • Prefer gated_auto when you can write a defensible suggested_fix for a localized change.
  • Use manual when the right fix depends on product intent, architecture, or cross-cutting refactors.
  • Use advisory when nothing breaks if left unfixed but the observation has value.
  • Do not emit safe_auto — callers decide what to apply; reviewers classify and propose.

Owner field

owner Meaning
downstream-resolver Caller or human should act after review.
human Judgment required before implementation.
release Operational / rollout follow-up.

Do not use review-fixer.