1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
autofix_class rubric (personas)
autofix_class describes the intrinsic shape of follow-up work — it is signal, not an apply gate or permission. In mode:agent the caller interprets findings and owns apply; in default (interactive) mode the review applies safe fixes itself by judgment (SKILL.md Stage 5c). Either way the class informs what to do first and what to flag — it does not mechanically decide what gets applied.
autofix_class |
Meaning |
|---|---|
gated_auto |
A concrete change is proposed in suggested_fix. Callers may apply after their own judgment. |
manual |
Actionable work that needs design input or a decision before code changes. Include suggested_fix when you can propose a defensible default. |
advisory |
Report-only — learnings, residual risk, rollout notes. |
Persona guidance
- Prefer
gated_autowhen you can write a defensiblesuggested_fixfor a localized change. - Use
manualwhen the right fix depends on product intent, architecture, or cross-cutting refactors. - Use
advisorywhen nothing breaks if left unfixed but the observation has value. - Do not emit
safe_auto— callers decide what to apply; reviewers classify and propose.
Owner field
owner |
Meaning |
|---|---|
downstream-resolver |
Caller or human should act after review. |
human |
Judgment required before implementation. |
release |
Operational / rollout follow-up. |
Do not use review-fixer.