# Intake

Classify the request into exactly one input shape — concept, diff, idea, or work-recap window — before any grounding runs. Parse by reasoning over the user's prompt; do not depend on argument-token substitution mechanics, which vary by harness.

## Flag tokens

Literal-prefix tokens are consumed and stripped; everything else is the request text.

| Token | Example | Effect |
|-------|---------|--------|
| `diff:<ref-or-range>` | `diff:abc1234`, `diff:main..HEAD`, `diff:PR#42` | Forces diff mode on that change |
| `since:<window-or-ref>` | `since:monday`, `since:7d`, `since:v2.1.0` | Forces recap mode over that window |
| `output:<md\|html>` | `output:md` | Overrides the artifact format (default `html`) |

- An explicit token always beats inference.
- `diff:` and `since:` together conflict — say so and ask which mode the user wants.
- An unrecognized `<word>:<word>` token (including conventional-commit prefixes like `feat:` appearing inside a topic) is not a flag — it passes through verbatim as request text.
- `output:` with an unknown value: drop the token, note `Ignored unknown output: value '<value>' — using html`, and continue.

## Inference (no forcing token)

Classify the remaining text by shape:

- **Diff** — the request names a resolvable change: a sha, branch, PR, "the last commit", "what you just did", "this change".
- **Recap** — the request asks what happened over time: "what did I do this week", "catch me up", "prep me for standup". Default window when unspecified: the last 7 days in the current repo.
- **Idea** — the request presents a proposal or notion of the user's to be understood: "explain my idea of X", "what would Y imply". The idea is a fixed given (see SKILL.md Boundaries).
- **Concept** — everything else: a topic, pattern, subsystem, or external subject to learn.

**Tiebreak — concept vs diff:** when the request is plausibly both (a repo topic that also names an identifiable recent change, e.g. "explain the retry logic we just added"), a concretely resolvable change wins: diff mode, with the concept as framing context. A topic with no resolvable change is a concept.

**Repo footprint check (concept mode):** a concept grounds in the repo only when it actually touches it. An external subject (a language feature, an interview topic, a paper) gets no repo grounding — do not force it.