wehub-resource-sync
76 lines
2.9 KiB
TypeScript
76 lines
2.9 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Regression test for #3556 / fix: providerCooldown missing from GET+PATCH /api/resilience
|
|
*
|
|
* The ResilienceTab component fetches GET /api/resilience and expects a `providerCooldown`
|
|
* field; likewise PATCH must accept and persist it. Without both, the Settings → Resilience
|
|
* page crashes on load and cannot save the provider-cooldown configuration.
|
|
*/
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { describe, it } from "node:test";
|
|
|
|
// Validate the schema accepts providerCooldown
|
|
import { updateResilienceSchema } from "../../src/shared/validation/schemas.js";
|
|
// Validate settings roundtrip
|
|
import {
|
|
resolveResilienceSettings,
|
|
mergeResilienceSettings,
|
|
} from "../../src/lib/resilience/settings.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("providerCooldown in updateResilienceSchema", () => {
|
|
it("accepts a valid providerCooldown patch", () => {
|
|
const result = updateResilienceSchema.safeParse({
|
|
providerCooldown: {
|
|
enabled: true,
|
|
minRetryCooldownMs: 3000,
|
|
maxRetryCooldownMs: 120000,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.success, true, `Schema rejected valid patch: ${JSON.stringify(result)}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts partial providerCooldown patch", () => {
|
|
const result = updateResilienceSchema.safeParse({
|
|
providerCooldown: { enabled: false },
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.success, true, `Schema rejected partial patch: ${JSON.stringify(result)}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unknown keys inside providerCooldown", () => {
|
|
const result = updateResilienceSchema.safeParse({
|
|
providerCooldown: { enabled: true, unknownKey: 42 },
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.success, false, "Schema should reject unknown keys");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects providerCooldown max below min", () => {
|
|
const result = updateResilienceSchema.safeParse({
|
|
providerCooldown: {
|
|
minRetryCooldownMs: 120000,
|
|
maxRetryCooldownMs: 30000,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(result.success, false, "Schema should reject contradictory cooldown bounds");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("providerCooldown roundtrip through mergeResilienceSettings", () => {
|
|
it("merges providerCooldown overrides correctly", () => {
|
|
const base = resolveResilienceSettings({});
|
|
const merged = mergeResilienceSettings(base, {
|
|
providerCooldown: { enabled: true, minRetryCooldownMs: 2000 },
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(merged.providerCooldown.enabled, true);
|
|
assert.equal(merged.providerCooldown.minRetryCooldownMs, 2000);
|
|
// maxRetryCooldownMs should remain from default
|
|
assert.ok(merged.providerCooldown.maxRetryCooldownMs > 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("resolveResilienceSettings returns providerCooldown field", () => {
|
|
const settings = resolveResilienceSettings({});
|
|
assert.ok("providerCooldown" in settings, "providerCooldown missing from resolved settings");
|
|
assert.ok("enabled" in settings.providerCooldown);
|
|
assert.ok("minRetryCooldownMs" in settings.providerCooldown);
|
|
assert.ok("maxRetryCooldownMs" in settings.providerCooldown);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|