407 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
407 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* tests/unit/quota-combo-balancing.test.ts
|
|
*
|
|
* Task 4 TDD — Fix same-provider combo collision:
|
|
* a pool with N connections to the same provider must produce ONE combo
|
|
* per model with ALL connection steps + strategy "quota-share".
|
|
*
|
|
* Uses "openrouter" (1 model: "auto") as test provider.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import fs from "node:fs";
|
|
import os from "node:os";
|
|
import path from "node:path";
|
|
|
|
// ── DB harness ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// Use a stable per-file temp dir so DATA_DIR is set ONCE before any module
|
|
// load. Never delete the SQLite file between tests — under --test-concurrency=4
|
|
// modules are cached across files and SQLITE_FILE is frozen at first import.
|
|
// Wipe test data via SQL DELETEs instead to avoid cross-file path corruption.
|
|
const TEST_DATA_DIR = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "omniroute-quota-combo-balancing-"));
|
|
process.env.DATA_DIR = TEST_DATA_DIR;
|
|
|
|
const core = await import("../../src/lib/db/core.ts");
|
|
const poolsDb = await import("../../src/lib/db/quotaPools.ts");
|
|
const providersDb = await import("../../src/lib/db/providers.ts");
|
|
const combosDb = await import("../../src/lib/db/combos.ts");
|
|
const { syncQuotaCombos } = await import("../../src/lib/quota/quotaCombos.ts");
|
|
const { isQuotaModelName, quotaModelName } =
|
|
await import("../../src/lib/quota/quotaModelNaming.ts");
|
|
const { PROVIDER_MODELS } = await import("../../open-sse/config/providerModels.ts");
|
|
|
|
// Trigger migration once at module load so the schema is ready for the first
|
|
// beforeEach without a slow per-test full migration run.
|
|
core.getDbInstance();
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Lifecycle
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
// Tables touched by this test suite. Cleared via SQL between tests to avoid
|
|
// the slow per-test full-migration race that fires under --test-force-exit
|
|
// with high concurrency (the rmSync approach also corrupts the module-level
|
|
// SQLITE_FILE pointer shared across concurrent test files).
|
|
const CLEAR_TABLES = [
|
|
"quota_pool_connections",
|
|
"quota_allocations",
|
|
"quota_pools",
|
|
"provider_connections",
|
|
"combos",
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
function resetStorage() {
|
|
const db = core.getDbInstance();
|
|
for (const table of CLEAR_TABLES) {
|
|
db.prepare(`DELETE FROM ${table}`).run();
|
|
}
|
|
// Re-seed the default quota group removed by the cascading delete on quota_pools.
|
|
db.prepare(
|
|
"INSERT OR IGNORE INTO quota_groups (id, name) VALUES ('group-demo', 'GroupDemo')"
|
|
).run();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Drain all pending microtasks and one round of macrotasks so that any
|
|
* fire-and-forget `syncQuotaCombosGuarded` calls dispatched by createPool /
|
|
* updatePool have a chance to run to completion before the next assertion.
|
|
*
|
|
* `setImmediate` fires AFTER all currently-queued microtasks (Promises), so a
|
|
* single `await new Promise(r => setImmediate(r))` is not a sleep — it is a
|
|
* deliberate synchronisation point that lets pending async work finish without
|
|
* introducing an arbitrary wall-clock delay.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function flushPendingSyncs(): Promise<void> {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
|
await new Promise<void>((r) => setImmediate(r));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test.beforeEach(() => {
|
|
resetStorage();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test.after(() => {
|
|
core.resetDbInstance();
|
|
try {
|
|
fs.rmSync(TEST_DATA_DIR, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
} catch {
|
|
// best-effort cleanup
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Helper
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
async function listQuotaCombos(): Promise<
|
|
Array<{ name: string; models: unknown[]; strategy: unknown }>
|
|
> {
|
|
const all = await combosDb.getCombos();
|
|
return all
|
|
.filter((c) => typeof c.name === "string" && isQuotaModelName(c.name as string))
|
|
.map((c) => ({
|
|
name: c.name as string,
|
|
models: Array.isArray(c.models) ? (c.models as unknown[]) : [],
|
|
strategy: c.strategy,
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const PROVIDER = "openrouter";
|
|
const FIRST_MODEL = "auto"; // single model in openrouter registry
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// B1 — 2-connection same-provider pool: one combo per model with 2 steps
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test("B1: syncQuotaCombos — 2-connection same-provider pool produces ONE combo per model with 2 steps + quota-share", async () => {
|
|
const modelsForProvider = (PROVIDER_MODELS[PROVIDER] ?? []).map((m) => m.id);
|
|
assert.ok(modelsForProvider.length > 0, `${PROVIDER} must have at least one model in registry`);
|
|
|
|
const connA = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b1-conn-a",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b1-a",
|
|
});
|
|
const connB = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b1-conn-b",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b1-b",
|
|
});
|
|
const idA = (connA as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
const idB = (connB as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
|
|
const pool = poolsDb.createPool({
|
|
connectionId: idA,
|
|
name: "BalancingPool B1",
|
|
connectionIds: [idA, idB],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
|
|
const quotaCombos = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
|
|
// Assert exactly one combo per model (no collision/duplicate).
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
quotaCombos.length,
|
|
modelsForProvider.length,
|
|
`expected exactly ${modelsForProvider.length} combo(s), one per model`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// For each model, assert: one combo, 2 steps, quota-share, both connIds present.
|
|
for (const modelId of modelsForProvider) {
|
|
// B4: combos are named with the GROUP name ("GroupDemo"), not pool name.
|
|
const comboName = quotaModelName("GroupDemo", PROVIDER, modelId);
|
|
const matchingCombos = quotaCombos.filter((c) => c.name === comboName);
|
|
|
|
// Exactly ONE combo with this name (no duplicate/collision).
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
matchingCombos.length,
|
|
1,
|
|
`expected exactly 1 combo named "${comboName}", got ${matchingCombos.length}`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const combo = matchingCombos[0];
|
|
|
|
// Strategy must be quota-share.
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
combo.strategy,
|
|
"quota-share",
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" strategy should be "quota-share", got "${combo.strategy}"`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Must have exactly 2 steps (one per connection).
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
combo.models.length,
|
|
2,
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" should have 2 steps (one per connection), got ${combo.models.length}`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Both connection IDs must appear in the steps.
|
|
const stepConnIds = (combo.models as Array<Record<string, unknown>>).map((s) => s.connectionId);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepConnIds.includes(idA),
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" steps should include connA (${idA}), got: ${JSON.stringify(stepConnIds)}`
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepConnIds.includes(idB),
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" steps should include connB (${idB}), got: ${JSON.stringify(stepConnIds)}`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Every step must reference the correct provider and model.
|
|
for (const step of combo.models as Array<Record<string, unknown>>) {
|
|
assert.equal(step.providerId, PROVIDER, `step.providerId should be "${PROVIDER}"`);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
typeof step.model === "string" && step.model.includes(modelId),
|
|
`step.model "${step.model}" should include model id "${modelId}"`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// B2 — Single-connection pool still produces a 1-step combo (no regression)
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test("B2: syncQuotaCombos — single-connection pool still produces 1-step combos (regression guard)", async () => {
|
|
const conn = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b2-conn",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b2",
|
|
});
|
|
const connId = (conn as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
|
|
const pool = poolsDb.createPool({
|
|
connectionId: connId,
|
|
name: "SingleConnPool B2",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
|
|
const quotaCombos = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
assert.ok(quotaCombos.length > 0, "single-connection pool should produce at least one combo");
|
|
|
|
for (const combo of quotaCombos) {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
combo.models.length,
|
|
1,
|
|
`single-connection pool combo "${combo.name}" should have exactly 1 step`
|
|
);
|
|
const step = combo.models[0] as Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
assert.equal(step.connectionId, connId, "step.connectionId should be the single connection");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// B3 — Idempotent: running syncQuotaCombos twice on a 2-connection pool
|
|
// still produces exactly 1 combo per model with 2 steps
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test("B3: syncQuotaCombos — idempotent on 2-connection pool (no duplicates after second run)", async () => {
|
|
const connA = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b3-conn-a",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b3-a",
|
|
});
|
|
const connB = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b3-conn-b",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b3-b",
|
|
});
|
|
const idA = (connA as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
const idB = (connB as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
|
|
const pool = poolsDb.createPool({
|
|
connectionId: idA,
|
|
name: "IdempotentBalancingPool B3",
|
|
connectionIds: [idA, idB],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
const afterFirst = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
const afterSecond = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
|
|
// Same count after both runs.
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
afterSecond.length,
|
|
afterFirst.length,
|
|
"second sync should not create duplicate combos"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Every combo from first run still has exactly 2 steps.
|
|
for (const combo of afterSecond) {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
combo.models.length,
|
|
2,
|
|
`after 2nd sync, combo "${combo.name}" should still have 2 steps, got ${combo.models.length}`
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
combo.strategy,
|
|
"quota-share",
|
|
`combo "${combo.name}" strategy must remain "quota-share"`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// B4 — After removing one connection → re-sync collapses to 1-step combo
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test("B4: syncQuotaCombos — after removing one connection from pool, re-sync collapses combo to 1 step", async () => {
|
|
const connA = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b4-conn-a",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b4-a",
|
|
});
|
|
const connB = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b4-conn-b",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b4-b",
|
|
});
|
|
const idA = (connA as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
|
|
const pool = poolsDb.createPool({
|
|
connectionId: idA,
|
|
name: "CollapsePool B4",
|
|
connectionIds: [idA, (connB as Record<string, unknown>).id as string],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Drain the fire-and-forget syncQuotaCombosGuarded dispatched by createPool
|
|
// before calling the explicit sync, so the initial explicit sync is the last writer.
|
|
await flushPendingSyncs();
|
|
|
|
// Initial sync: 2 steps.
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
// Drain any background syncs before asserting.
|
|
await flushPendingSyncs();
|
|
const initial = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
for (const c of initial) {
|
|
assert.equal(c.models.length, 2, `initial: combo "${c.name}" should have 2 steps`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Remove connB — pool now has only connA.
|
|
poolsDb.updatePool(pool.id, { connectionIds: [idA] });
|
|
|
|
// Drain the fire-and-forget from updatePool so it cannot overwrite the
|
|
// 1-step result that the following explicit sync will produce.
|
|
await flushPendingSyncs();
|
|
|
|
// Re-sync: should collapse to 1 step.
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
// Final drain: ensure no stale background sync can revert to 2 steps.
|
|
await flushPendingSyncs();
|
|
const after = await listQuotaCombos();
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(after.length, initial.length, "combo count should be unchanged after connB removal");
|
|
for (const c of after) {
|
|
assert.equal(c.models.length, 1, `after removal, combo "${c.name}" should collapse to 1 step`);
|
|
const step = c.models[0] as Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
assert.equal(step.connectionId, idA, "remaining step must be pinned to connA");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// B5 — getComboByName: confirming no duplicate combo name exists
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test("B5: after syncQuotaCombos on 2-connection pool, getComboByName returns the N-step combo (no collision)", async () => {
|
|
const connA = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b5-conn-a",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b5-a",
|
|
});
|
|
const connB = await providersDb.createProviderConnection({
|
|
provider: PROVIDER,
|
|
authType: "apikey",
|
|
name: "b5-conn-b",
|
|
apiKey: "sk-b5-b",
|
|
});
|
|
const idA = (connA as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
const idB = (connB as Record<string, unknown>).id as string;
|
|
|
|
const pool = poolsDb.createPool({
|
|
connectionId: idA,
|
|
name: "GetByNamePool B5",
|
|
connectionIds: [idA, idB],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await syncQuotaCombos(pool.id);
|
|
|
|
// B4: combos are named with the GROUP name ("GroupDemo"), not pool name.
|
|
const comboName = quotaModelName("GroupDemo", PROVIDER, FIRST_MODEL);
|
|
const found = await combosDb.getComboByName(comboName);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(found, `getComboByName("${comboName}") should return the combo`);
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(found.models), "combo.models should be an array");
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
(found.models as unknown[]).length,
|
|
2,
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" models.length should be 2, got ${(found.models as unknown[]).length}`
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
found.strategy,
|
|
"quota-share",
|
|
`combo "${comboName}" strategy should be "quota-share"`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify no second combo by scanning all combos for the same name.
|
|
const all = await combosDb.getCombos();
|
|
const withSameName = all.filter((c) => c.name === comboName);
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
withSameName.length,
|
|
1,
|
|
`there should be exactly 1 combo named "${comboName}", found ${withSameName.length}`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|