191 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
191 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* TDD — proxy egress IP visibility. Confirms by which IP each OAuth connection
|
|
* leaves, and flags same-rotation-group accounts sharing one egress IP (the
|
|
* exact codex anomaly-revocation trigger). Network probe is injected.
|
|
*/
|
|
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
|
|
const egress = await import("../../src/lib/proxyEgress.ts");
|
|
const {
|
|
resolveEgressIp,
|
|
analyzeEgressSharing,
|
|
diagnoseAllEgressIps,
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests,
|
|
clearEgressCache,
|
|
} = egress as unknown as {
|
|
resolveEgressIp: (u: string | null, o?: any) => Promise<{ ip: string | null; cached: boolean }>;
|
|
analyzeEgressSharing: (c: any[]) => {
|
|
byEgressIp: Record<string, string[]>;
|
|
sharedWithinRotationGroup: Array<{ egressIp: string; rotationGroup: string; connections: string[] }>;
|
|
};
|
|
diagnoseAllEgressIps: (deps?: any) => Promise<any>;
|
|
validateProxyPool: (deps?: any) => Promise<any[]>;
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests: (fn: any) => void;
|
|
clearEgressCache: () => void;
|
|
};
|
|
const { validateProxyPool, planProxyDistribution, applyProxyDistribution } = egress as any;
|
|
|
|
test("resolveEgressIp returns the probed IP and caches by proxy URL", async () => {
|
|
clearEgressCache();
|
|
let calls = 0;
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(async (proxyUrl: string | null) => {
|
|
calls++;
|
|
return { ip: proxyUrl ? "203.0.113.7" : "198.51.100.1", latencyMs: 5 };
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const viaProxy = await resolveEgressIp("http://1.2.3.4:8080");
|
|
assert.equal(viaProxy.ip, "203.0.113.7");
|
|
assert.equal(viaProxy.cached, false);
|
|
|
|
const direct = await resolveEgressIp(null);
|
|
assert.equal(direct.ip, "198.51.100.1");
|
|
|
|
// second call for the same proxy URL is served from cache (no extra probe)
|
|
const again = await resolveEgressIp("http://1.2.3.4:8080");
|
|
assert.equal(again.cached, true);
|
|
assert.equal(calls, 2, "only 2 distinct probes (proxy + direct), not 3");
|
|
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("analyzeEgressSharing flags ≥2 same-rotation-group accounts on one egress IP", () => {
|
|
const result = analyzeEgressSharing([
|
|
{ connectionId: "a", provider: "codex", account: "acc-a", proxyLevel: "direct", proxyHost: null, egressIp: "100.115.194.84" },
|
|
{ connectionId: "b", provider: "codex", account: "acc-b", proxyLevel: "direct", proxyHost: null, egressIp: "100.115.194.84" },
|
|
{ connectionId: "c", provider: "openai", account: "acc-c", proxyLevel: "direct", proxyHost: null, egressIp: "100.115.194.84" },
|
|
{ connectionId: "d", provider: "claude", account: "acc-d", proxyLevel: "direct", proxyHost: null, egressIp: "100.115.194.84" },
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
// codex + openai share the openai-auth0 family → 3 accounts on one IP = warning
|
|
const warn = result.sharedWithinRotationGroup.find((w) => w.rotationGroup === "openai-auth0");
|
|
assert.ok(warn, "must warn about the codex/openai family sharing an egress IP");
|
|
assert.equal(warn!.egressIp, "100.115.194.84");
|
|
assert.equal(warn!.connections.length, 3, "acc-a + acc-b + acc-c");
|
|
|
|
// claude alone on the IP is NOT a warning (different family, single account)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!result.sharedWithinRotationGroup.some((w) => w.connections.includes("acc-d")),
|
|
"a lone claude account must not be flagged"
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result.byEgressIp["100.115.194.84"].sort(), ["acc-a", "acc-b", "acc-c", "acc-d"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("analyzeEgressSharing: distinct IPs per account = no warning (the healthy .17 case)", () => {
|
|
const result = analyzeEgressSharing([
|
|
{ connectionId: "a", provider: "codex", account: "acc-a", proxyLevel: "account", proxyHost: "p1", egressIp: "203.0.113.1" },
|
|
{ connectionId: "b", provider: "codex", account: "acc-b", proxyLevel: "account", proxyHost: "p2", egressIp: "203.0.113.2" },
|
|
]);
|
|
assert.equal(result.sharedWithinRotationGroup.length, 0, "1 IP per account is safe");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("diagnoseAllEgressIps wires resolution + probe and surfaces the shared-IP warning", async () => {
|
|
clearEgressCache();
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(async () => ({ ip: "100.115.194.84", latencyMs: 3 }));
|
|
|
|
const diag = await diagnoseAllEgressIps({
|
|
getConnections: async () => [
|
|
{ id: "c1", provider: "codex", email: "one@x.com" },
|
|
{ id: "c2", provider: "codex", email: "two@x.com" },
|
|
],
|
|
resolveProxy: async () => ({ proxy: { type: "http", host: "9.9.9.9", port: 8080 }, level: "global" }),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(diag.connections.length, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(diag.connections[0].egressIp, "100.115.194.84");
|
|
assert.equal(diag.connections[0].proxyLevel, "global");
|
|
assert.equal(diag.sharedWithinRotationGroup.length, 1, "both codex accounts share one egress IP");
|
|
assert.equal(diag.sharedWithinRotationGroup[0].connections.length, 2);
|
|
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("validateProxyPool marks live proxies active and dead proxies error", async () => {
|
|
clearEgressCache();
|
|
// proxy p-live reaches the internet; p-dead times out
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(async (proxyUrl: string | null) => {
|
|
if (proxyUrl && proxyUrl.includes("9.9.9.9")) return { ip: "203.0.113.9", latencyMs: 12 };
|
|
return { ip: null, latencyMs: 7000, error: "timeout" };
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const marked: Record<string, string> = {};
|
|
const report = await validateProxyPool({
|
|
listProxies: async () => [
|
|
{ id: "p-live", type: "http", host: "9.9.9.9", port: 8080, status: "error" },
|
|
{ id: "p-dead", type: "http", host: "1.1.1.1", port: 8080, status: "active" },
|
|
],
|
|
markStatus: async (id: string, status: string) => {
|
|
marked[id] = status;
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(marked["p-live"], "active", "a reachable proxy must be (re)marked active");
|
|
assert.equal(marked["p-dead"], "error", "an unreachable proxy must be marked error (so resolution skips it)");
|
|
|
|
const live = report.find((r) => r.proxyId === "p-live");
|
|
assert.equal(live!.alive, true);
|
|
assert.equal(live!.egressIp, "203.0.113.9");
|
|
assert.equal(live!.previousStatus, "error");
|
|
const dead = report.find((r) => r.proxyId === "p-dead");
|
|
assert.equal(dead!.alive, false);
|
|
assert.equal(dead!.previousStatus, "active", "was wrongly active before validation");
|
|
|
|
_setEgressProbeForTests(null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("planProxyDistribution: strict 1:1, extras left unassigned (no shared IP)", () => {
|
|
const plan = planProxyDistribution(
|
|
[{ id: "c1", account: "a1" }, { id: "c2", account: "a2" }, { id: "c3", account: "a3" }],
|
|
["p1", "p2"]
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.assignments.length, 2);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(plan.assignments.map((a: any) => a.proxyId), ["p1", "p2"]);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.unassigned.length, 1, "c3 has no proxy → unassigned, not sharing");
|
|
assert.equal(plan.unassigned[0].connectionId, "c3");
|
|
assert.equal(plan.sharingRisk, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("planProxyDistribution: enough proxies → 1 distinct per account", () => {
|
|
const plan = planProxyDistribution(
|
|
[{ id: "c1", account: "a1" }, { id: "c2", account: "a2" }],
|
|
["p1", "p2", "p3"]
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.assignments.length, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.unassigned.length, 0);
|
|
assert.match(plan.note, /1 distinct proxy/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("planProxyDistribution: allowSharing round-robins and flags sharingRisk", () => {
|
|
const plan = planProxyDistribution(
|
|
[{ id: "c1", account: "a1" }, { id: "c2", account: "a2" }, { id: "c3", account: "a3" }],
|
|
["p1", "p2"],
|
|
{ allowSharing: true }
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.assignments.length, 3);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(plan.assignments.map((a: any) => a.proxyId), ["p1", "p2", "p1"]);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.sharingRisk, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("planProxyDistribution: no live proxies → all unassigned with guidance", () => {
|
|
const plan = planProxyDistribution([{ id: "c1", account: "a1" }], []);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.assignments.length, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(plan.unassigned.length, 1);
|
|
assert.match(plan.note, /No live proxies/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("applyProxyDistribution assigns each proxy to its connection", async () => {
|
|
const calls: Array<[string, string]> = [];
|
|
const plan = planProxyDistribution(
|
|
[{ id: "c1", account: "a1" }, { id: "c2", account: "a2" }],
|
|
["p1", "p2"]
|
|
);
|
|
const res = await applyProxyDistribution(plan, {
|
|
assign: async (connectionId: string, proxyId: string) => {
|
|
calls.push([connectionId, proxyId]);
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
assert.equal(res.applied, 2);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(calls, [["c1", "p1"], ["c2", "p2"]]);
|
|
});
|