117 lines
4.2 KiB
TypeScript
117 lines
4.2 KiB
TypeScript
import test from "node:test";
|
|
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
|
|
import { normalizeHeaders } from "../../open-sse/utils/headers.ts";
|
|
import { createChatPipelineHarness } from "../integration/_chatPipelineHarness.ts";
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Guard for the same-provider cascade (issue #3200): when a combo has SEVERAL
|
|
* targets from the same provider and that provider fails, the combo must NOT
|
|
* cascade through every same-provider target before falling back.
|
|
*
|
|
* Finding (TDD investigation of PRs #3145 / #3169, 2026-06): the EXISTING
|
|
* connection-cooldown already prevents this. After the FIRST same-provider
|
|
* failure (404 here, also 5xx) the connection is marked unavailable, so every
|
|
* remaining same-provider target is pre-screened out before dispatch — the
|
|
* provider is hit exactly ONCE, then the combo falls back to a different
|
|
* provider. This is stronger than PR #3145's provider-level counter (which would
|
|
* try the provider twice before short-circuiting) and does not need the parallel
|
|
* cooldown cache PR #3169 proposed. This test locks that behavior in so a future
|
|
* change can't silently regress the cascade guard.
|
|
*/
|
|
const harness = await createChatPipelineHarness("combo-same-provider-cascade");
|
|
const {
|
|
buildClaudeResponse,
|
|
buildRequest,
|
|
combosDb,
|
|
handleChat,
|
|
resetStorage,
|
|
seedConnection,
|
|
settingsDb,
|
|
} = harness;
|
|
|
|
test.beforeEach(async () => {
|
|
await resetStorage();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test.afterEach(async () => {
|
|
await resetStorage();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test.after(async () => {
|
|
await harness.cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("combo hits a failing provider only once before falling back across same-provider targets (#3200)", async () => {
|
|
await seedConnection("openai", { apiKey: "sk-openai-cascade" });
|
|
await seedConnection("claude", { apiKey: "sk-claude-cascade" });
|
|
await settingsDb.updateSettings({ requestRetry: 0, maxRetryIntervalSec: 0 });
|
|
|
|
// Three openai targets followed by one claude target. All openai models route
|
|
// to the single seeded openai connection (same provider string).
|
|
await combosDb.createCombo({
|
|
name: "same-provider-cascade-combo",
|
|
strategy: "priority",
|
|
config: { maxRetries: 0, retryDelayMs: 0 },
|
|
models: [
|
|
"openai/o3-mini",
|
|
"openai/o1-mini",
|
|
"openai/gpt-4.1-mini",
|
|
"claude/claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022",
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
let openaiCalls = 0;
|
|
let claudeCalls = 0;
|
|
|
|
globalThis.fetch = async (_url, init = {}) => {
|
|
const headers = normalizeHeaders(init.headers);
|
|
const authHeader = headers.authorization ?? headers.Authorization;
|
|
const apiKeyHeader = headers["x-api-key"] ?? headers["X-Api-Key"];
|
|
|
|
if (authHeader === "Bearer sk-openai-cascade") {
|
|
openaiCalls += 1;
|
|
// 404 → per-model lockout (NOT whole-connection cooldown), so the openai
|
|
// connection stays usable and the next same-provider model is attempted.
|
|
// This is the cascade #3200 describes; #3145's consecutive-failure tracking
|
|
// is what cuts it short (5xx is already handled by connection cooldown).
|
|
return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: { message: "model not found" } }), {
|
|
status: 404,
|
|
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
apiKeyHeader === "sk-claude-cascade" ||
|
|
authHeader === "Bearer sk-claude-cascade"
|
|
) {
|
|
claudeCalls += 1;
|
|
return buildClaudeResponse("claude handled the fallback");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
throw new Error(`unexpected upstream headers: ${JSON.stringify(headers)}`);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const response = await handleChat(
|
|
buildRequest({
|
|
body: {
|
|
model: "same-provider-cascade-combo",
|
|
stream: false,
|
|
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "cascade request" }],
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
const body = (await response.json()) as any;
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(response.status, 200);
|
|
assert.equal(body.choices[0].message.content, "claude handled the fallback");
|
|
// The connection cools down on the first failure, so the 2nd and 3rd openai
|
|
// targets are pre-screened out — the provider is dispatched to exactly once.
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
openaiCalls,
|
|
1,
|
|
`expected the failing provider to be hit once then short-circuited by connection cooldown, got ${openaiCalls} calls`
|
|
);
|
|
assert.equal(claudeCalls, 1, "claude must serve the request after the cascade is cut short");
|
|
});
|