Files
wehub-resource-sync bb5c75ce05
Component Security Validation / Security Audit (push) Has been cancelled
Deploy to Cloudflare Pages / deploy (push) Has been cancelled
chore: import upstream snapshot with attribution
2026-07-13 12:38:58 +08:00

3.3 KiB

Adding Reference Mindsets

Reference mindsets are philosophical foundations for simplicity. They explain why less is more, giving agents deeper calibration beyond the mechanical checkpoints.

Where They Live

Mindsets live in @reference/. Each is a standalone file named by concept.

File Structure

---
description: One-sentence summary of the core insight and why it matters.
---

# Concept Name

## The Core Insight

The central idea in 1-2 sentences. Quotable. Memorable.

## Why This Matters

How this connects to avoiding complexity. Why an LLM should care.
What goes wrong when you ignore this principle.

## Practical Application

Concrete questions to ask or checks to apply.
How to use this mindset when evaluating design options.

## External References

Links to primary sources - talks, papers, books that originated or best explain this concept.

Quality Checklist

Before adding a mindset:

  • Counters over-engineering? Does it help resist the urge to add?
  • Distinct from existing? Not redundant with current mindsets
  • Concise? Can be explained in under 50 lines
  • Memorable core insight? Has a quotable central principle
  • Named by concept? Not by person or source

Good Candidates

Ideas that would make strong mindsets:

Concept Core Insight
worse-is-better Shipping a simple thing beats perfecting a complex one
essential-vs-accidental Most complexity is accidental and can be eliminated
locality-of-behavior Code should be understandable without jumping around
boring-technology Innovation tokens are limited; use boring tech by default
separation-of-concerns Each piece should have one reason to change
rule-of-three Don't abstract until you've seen the pattern three times

What NOT to Add

Technology-specific advice → Belongs in project docs or tech-specific skills

  • "React components should..."
  • "In Rust, prefer..."

Process/workflow rules → Belongs in skills, not mindsets

  • "Always run tests before..."
  • "Use TDD when..."

Vague platitudes → If there's no actionable insight, skip it

  • "Write clean code"
  • "Think before you code"

Anything requiring context → Mindsets should be universal

  • "In microservices architectures..."
  • "When working with legacy code..."

The Test

A good mindset should help an agent answer: "Should I add this abstraction?"

If the mindset doesn't directly inform that question, it probably belongs somewhere else.

Source Material

Primary sources for simplicity thinking. Draw from these when creating new mindsets: