9.1 KiB
Spring AI Showcase — Parity Notes
This document tracks demos from the canonical langgraph-python showcase
manifest that are not ported to the Spring AI showcase, along with the
specific Spring AI / ag-ui:spring-ai primitive that is missing.
Spring AI is a Java framework with a narrower primitive set than LangGraph for a handful of specific use-cases — especially streaming structured output, multi-agent orchestration, and graph-level interrupts. The demos below are the ones where those primitives are genuinely unavailable.
Skipped demos
LangGraph graph-control primitives (no Spring AI equivalent)
- subagents — Ported using the tool-composition pattern (each
sub-agent is a separate
ChatClientcall wired as a supervisor tool; seeSubagentsController). This deviates from LangGraph's graph-as-node construct: there is no per-sub-agent interrupt point, and step-started/step-finished events are not emitted. The user-visible semantics — supervisor delegates work, each delegation is logged in shared state, the UI renders a live timeline — match the canonical demo. STATE_SNAPSHOT is emitted after every delegation so the delegation log updates incrementally.
ag-ui:spring-ai adapter gaps
-
shared-state-streaming — Spring AI's
ChatClient.stream()emits token deltas, but theag-ui:spring-aiadapter does not expose a mid-stream state-delta emission API comparable to LangGraph'scopilotkit_emit_state. Per-token state patches cannot be forwarded through the AG-UI channel with the current integration. The demo cell is shipped as a stub frontend (src/app/demos/shared-state-streaming/) so the UI lights up when the adapter exposes mid-stream emission. -
byoc-json-render — Relies on a streaming structured-output primitive (LangGraph's
with_structured_output+ incremental JSON streaming that yields partial objects matching a Zod schema across the stream). Spring AI hasBeanOutputConverter/ParameterizedTypeReferencestructured output, but it resolves on the FINAL response only — it does not emit partial schema-conformant objects during the stream. The BYOC renderer needs per-token JSON to progressively paint the UI. Additionally,@json-render/coreand@json-render/reactare not currently dependencies of the Spring AI showcase package.
Ported with caveats
-
gen-ui-interrupt — Ported using Strategy B (the same approach used by MS Agent Python). Spring AI has no
interrupt()primitive, so the backend agent (InterruptAgentController) provides a scheduling system prompt with NO backend tool callbacks. Theschedule_meetingtool is registered entirely on the frontend viauseFrontendToolwith an async handler that renders aTimePickerCardand blocks until the user picks a slot or cancels. The UX is identical to the LangGraph version. -
interrupt-headless — Same Strategy B adaptation as
gen-ui-interrupt, but the time-picker popup renders in the app surface (outside the chat) instead of inline. Both demos share the same backend agent (InterruptAgentController). -
byoc-hashbrown — Ported. The hashbrown UI kit (
@hashbrownai/react@0.5.0-beta.4) consumes streaming text and usesuseJsonParserto progressively assemble UI from partial JSON. Spring AI'sChatClient.stream()streams text tokens, so the hashbrown parser tolerates the per-token feed. Final-shape correctness depends on the model following the example prompt — there is no guarantee like LangGraph'swith_structured_output. -
gen-ui-tool-based — Ported using
useComponentper-tool renderers bound torender_bar_chart/render_pie_charttools. Args stream as partial JSON; the Zod schemas accept partials so the chart components can render once enough fields are present. -
reasoning-custom, reasoning-default, tool-rendering-reasoning-chain — frontend code is wired for
REASONING_MESSAGE_*events, but the Spring AI handler CANNOT emit them. This is a genuine SDK limitation in Spring AI 1.0.1, not an adapter or wiring gap. Details below.What the demo needs. The reasoning UI mounts only when the backend emits AG-UI
REASONING_MESSAGE_START/_CONTENT/_ENDevents (role"reasoning"). The canonicallanggraph-pythonagent produces these by routing the OpenAI model's reasoning summary through the OpenAI Responses API (reasoning={"effort": "medium", "summary": "detailed"}). The aimock fixtures for these spring-ai cells (d6/spring-ai/reasoning.json,d6/spring-ai/tool-rendering-reasoning-chain.json, copied from langgraph-python) carry the reasoning text in a dedicatedresponse.reasoningfield, which aimock renders over the OpenAI chat-completions wire as streamingdelta.reasoning_contentchunks (see@copilotkit/aimockbuildTextChunks—delta: { reasoning_content: slice }).Why Spring AI 1.0.1 cannot surface it. The spring-ai integration speaks OpenAI chat-completions (
spring-ai-starter-model-openai,/v1/chat/completions). Inspring-ai-openai:1.0.1the streaming delta is bound to the recordOpenAiApi.ChatCompletionMessage, whose components are exactlyrawContent, role, name, toolCallId, toolCalls, refusal, audioOutput, annotations— there is noreasoning_content/reasoningfield, no metadata map, and no@JsonAnySettercatch-all. The record is annotated@JsonIgnoreProperties, so the inboundreasoning_contentJSON property is silently discarded at deserialization. It never reachesChatResponse/Generation.getOutput(), so the Java handler has no API to read it. The reasoning-summary channel of the OpenAI Responses API is also unavailable:spring-ai-openai:1.0.1ships no Responses-API client (onlyOpenAiApichat-completions classes exist), so the langgraph-python parity path cannot be reproduced either.Why the inline-
<reasoning>-tag workaround does not apply. The provenclaude-sdk-pythonagent PRIMARILY maps Anthropic's native extended-thinking channel: it enablesthinking={"type": "enabled", ...}on the Messages API, receivesthinking_deltablocks, and re-routes them toREASONING_MESSAGE_*. Only when no native thinking channel is present does it FALL BACK to prompting the model to wrap its plan in literal<reasoning>...</reasoning>text tags inside normal output and parsing those tags out of the text stream. The inline-tag fallback IS expressible in Spring AI (the handler already streamsgetOutput().getText()). But neither claude-sdk path fits these cells: the spring-ai aimock fixtures emit reasoning through the dedicatedreasoningfield (→reasoning_content), NOT via an Anthropic native thinking channel and NOT as inline<reasoning>tags incontent. Rewriting the fixtures to embed inline tags — or hand-fabricating a reasoning block in the handler — would be a demo-weakening fixture hack that misrepresents the integration's real capability, so it is deliberately not done.What a real fix requires (upstream / out of scope here). Either (a) Spring AI adds a
reasoning_content(or reasoning-summary) field to its chat-completions delta record and exposes it onGeneration/output metadata; or (b) Spring AI ships an OpenAI Responses-API client that surfaces the reasoning summary; or (c) a customWebClient-level interceptor parses the raw chat-completions SSE fordelta.reasoning_contentBEFORE Spring AI's binding drops it, bypassingChatCliententirely (a substantial custom-parser effort that re-implements the streaming pipeline). None of these is a showcase-side change. Until one lands, these cells ship as frontend code (so the pattern is documented end-to-end) and the chat behaves as a regular chat with no reasoning block. -
multimodal — the frontend sends image + PDF attachments through CopilotChat's
AttachmentsConfig. Whether the adapter forwards them into Spring AI'sUserMessage.media()surface is integration-dependent; the Spring-AI model (gpt-4.1) is vision-capable on the provider side. -
mcp-apps — the runtime wires the MCP Apps middleware with the public Excalidraw MCP server. The middleware injects MCP tools into the AG-UI request so the Spring-AI ChatClient sees them, and intercepts tool calls to emit activity events. Whether the
ag-ui:spring-aiadapter forwards runtime-injected tools into Spring AI's tool-calling surface is integration-dependent; the demo wiring is in place so the cell lights up when the adapter supports it.
Ported demos
The full ported list lives in manifest.yaml. Highlights include:
agentic-chat, tool-rendering (default + custom + catchall), frontend-tools
(+ async), hitl-in-chat (+ booking variant), hitl-in-app, prebuilt-sidebar
/ popup, chat-slots, chat-customization-css, headless-simple,
headless-complete, beautiful-chat, auth, readonly-state-agent-context,
open-gen-ui (+ advanced), voice, agent-config, a2ui-fixed-schema,
declarative-gen-ui, multimodal, gen-ui-tool-based, mcp-apps,
byoc-hashbrown, and the three reasoning variants.