wehub-resource-sync
245 lines
9.1 KiB
TypeScript
245 lines
9.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
|
|
|
|
// QA reference: qa/hitl-in-app.md
|
|
// Demo source: src/app/demos/hitl-in-app/{page.tsx, approval-dialog.tsx}
|
|
//
|
|
// Demo registers ONE frontend tool via `useFrontendTool`:
|
|
// `request_user_approval(message, context?)`. The handler returns a Promise
|
|
// whose `resolve` is stashed in state; the parent renders `ApprovalDialog`,
|
|
// portal'd to `document.body` via `createPortal` — so the modal lives
|
|
// OUTSIDE the chat transcript. Approve / Reject click resolves the tool
|
|
// promise with `{ approved, reason? }` and hands it back to the agent.
|
|
//
|
|
// Genuine assertion strategy: the deterministic aimock fixtures emit two
|
|
// branched continuations per pill (sequenceIndex 0 = approve, 1 = reject).
|
|
// Since the JSON fixture matcher cannot inspect tool message content, we
|
|
// rely on test ordering (serial mode) so test #1 of the pair claims
|
|
// sequenceIndex 0 (approve response) and test #2 claims sequenceIndex 1
|
|
// (reject response). If the framework wired approve/reject into the same
|
|
// payload, both branches would still receive the same fixture's response
|
|
// — but the assertion text differs, so at least one of the two tests
|
|
// would fail. That asymmetry is what makes the assertion genuine.
|
|
|
|
test.describe("HITL In-App (approval dialog portaled to <body>)", () => {
|
|
// Serial mode is load-bearing: aimock's `sequenceIndex` matcher counts
|
|
// matches across the whole process, so the approve test (sequenceIndex 0)
|
|
// MUST run before the reject test (sequenceIndex 1) for each pill pair.
|
|
test.describe.configure({ mode: "serial" });
|
|
|
|
test.setTimeout(120_000);
|
|
|
|
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
|
|
await page.goto("/demos/hitl-in-app");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("page loads with 3 tickets, chat input, and no open modal", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await expect(page.getByTestId("ticket-12345")).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.getByTestId("ticket-12346")).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.getByTestId("ticket-12347")).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.getByPlaceholder("Type a message")).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("suggestion pills reference each open ticket", async ({ page }) => {
|
|
const suggestions = page.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]');
|
|
await expect(
|
|
suggestions.filter({ hasText: "Approve refund for #12345" }).first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
|
|
await expect(
|
|
suggestions.filter({ hasText: "Downgrade plan for #12346" }).first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
|
|
await expect(
|
|
suggestions.filter({ hasText: "Escalate ticket #12347" }).first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("refund #12345 → approve → assistant confirms processing", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Approve refund for #12345" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
// Modal mounts as a DIRECT child of <body> (createPortal contract).
|
|
const bodyModal = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(bodyModal).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
await expect(page.getByTestId("approval-dialog")).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-reason")).toBeVisible();
|
|
|
|
await page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-approve").click();
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 5_000 });
|
|
|
|
// Approve branch: deterministic fixture leading phrase.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "I am processing the $50 refund" })
|
|
.first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("refund #12345 → reject → assistant acknowledges rejection", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Approve refund for #12345" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
const bodyModal = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(bodyModal).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
|
|
await page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-reject").click();
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 5_000 });
|
|
|
|
// Reject branch: deterministic fixture leading phrase. Substring
|
|
// assertion is intentional — locks the reject-branch identity.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "refund request was not approved" })
|
|
.first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("escalate #12347 → approve → assistant confirms escalation", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Escalate ticket #12347" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
const bodyModal = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(bodyModal).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
|
|
await page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-approve").click();
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 5_000 });
|
|
|
|
// Approve branch leading phrase: "Escalated ticket #12347 ...".
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Escalated ticket #12347" })
|
|
.first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("escalate #12347 → reject → assistant acknowledges non-escalation", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Escalate ticket #12347" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
const bodyModal = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(bodyModal).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
|
|
await page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-reject").click();
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 5_000 });
|
|
|
|
// Reject branch leading phrase: "Not escalated ...".
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Not escalated" })
|
|
.first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// TODO: re-enable when downgrade flow is fixed (broken upstream as of 2026-05-07)
|
|
test("downgrade #12346 → approve/reject flow", async () => {
|
|
// Intentionally skipped per spec: the downgrade pill exposes a
|
|
// separate upstream bug (ticket-12346 surface) that is out of scope
|
|
// for the genuine-pass rewrite. Re-enable when the upstream demo
|
|
// reliably emits request_user_approval for the downgrade prompt.
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Regression for the aimock multi-pill bug:
|
|
// The refund (#12345) and escalate (#12347) fixtures used
|
|
// `hasToolResult: false/true` to split the request_user_approval emit
|
|
// from the approve/reject narration. After approving the first pill, the
|
|
// thread already had a tool result, so the second pill's first-turn
|
|
// fixture was skipped — the approve/reject branch fired immediately with
|
|
// no approval dialog. Fix: chain the follow-up fixtures via the
|
|
// request_user_approval `toolCallId`, drop `hasToolResult: false` from
|
|
// the tool-emitting fixture. This test approves refund #12345 then
|
|
// clicks escalate #12347 in the same thread and asserts the second pill
|
|
// mounts its own approval dialog.
|
|
test("approve refund then click escalate — each pill mounts its own approval dialog", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
test.setTimeout(240_000);
|
|
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Approve refund for #12345" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
const refundDialog = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(refundDialog).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
// The first dialog targets ticket #12345.
|
|
await expect(refundDialog.getByText(/#12345/).first()).toBeVisible();
|
|
|
|
await page.getByTestId("approval-dialog-approve").click();
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]'),
|
|
).toHaveCount(0, { timeout: 5_000 });
|
|
|
|
// First pill's approve narration lands before we click the next pill.
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "processing the $50 refund" })
|
|
.first(),
|
|
).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
|
|
// Second pill: must trigger its OWN request_user_approval tool call
|
|
// and mount a fresh approval dialog targeting ticket #12347.
|
|
await page
|
|
.locator('[data-testid="copilot-suggestion"]')
|
|
.filter({ hasText: "Escalate ticket #12347" })
|
|
.first()
|
|
.click();
|
|
|
|
const escalateDialog = page.locator(
|
|
'body > [data-testid="approval-dialog-overlay"]',
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(escalateDialog).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
await expect(escalateDialog.getByText(/#12347/).first()).toBeVisible();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|