195 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
195 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
|
|
import type { Page } from "@playwright/test";
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* E2E spec for the Multimodal Attachments demo.
|
|
*
|
|
* Exercises the sample-file injection path only — the real OS file
|
|
* picker isn't automatable through Playwright without a flakey host-
|
|
* file dependency. The sample buttons go through the same V2 agent
|
|
* surface (`agent.addMessage` + `copilotkit.runAgent`) that the
|
|
* paperclip path ultimately feeds, so this suite covers the render +
|
|
* round-trip path end-to-end.
|
|
*
|
|
* Behavior pinned by this suite (each was an actual regression caught
|
|
* during the multimodal rewrite — see headers in
|
|
* sample-attachment-buttons.tsx and legacy-converter-shim.tsx):
|
|
*
|
|
* 1. Clicking a sample button auto-sends the canned prompt — no manual
|
|
* fill / send required. Earlier the DataTransfer-into-file-input
|
|
* approach raced the upload state, the send got rejected, and the
|
|
* prompt got eaten.
|
|
* 2. The user message keeps showing exactly ONE attachment chip after
|
|
* the assistant response arrives. The @ag-ui/langgraph round-trip
|
|
* used to duplicate the attachment (modern + re-converted shape) so
|
|
* the user saw two thumbnails for one file.
|
|
* 3. Sample-PDF specifically renders as a `DocumentAttachment` chip,
|
|
* NOT as an `<img>` that errors with "Failed to load image". Earlier
|
|
* the round-trip mis-tagged PDFs with `type: "image"` and forced the
|
|
* image renderer.
|
|
* 4. The PDF flattened text doesn't bleed into the rendered user
|
|
* message. Earlier `_PdfFlattenMiddleware` ran in `before_model`
|
|
* and persisted the flattened "[Attached document]\n<pdf body>"
|
|
* into state, which the chat UI rendered inline.
|
|
* 5. Clicking image then PDF in the same session (and vice versa)
|
|
* leaves each user message with its own single, correct chip — no
|
|
* cross-contamination, no doubling.
|
|
*
|
|
* Assumes the demo is reachable at BASE_URL/demos/multimodal and
|
|
* aimock is configured with the canned prompts:
|
|
* - "can you tell me what is in this demo image I just attached"
|
|
* - "can you tell me what is in this demo pdf I just attached"
|
|
* Both fixtures live in showcase/aimock/feature-parity.json.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const ROUTE = "/demos/multimodal";
|
|
|
|
const SAMPLE_IMAGE_BTN = '[data-testid="multimodal-sample-image-button"]';
|
|
const SAMPLE_PDF_BTN = '[data-testid="multimodal-sample-pdf-button"]';
|
|
const CHAT_TEXTAREA = '[data-testid="copilot-chat-textarea"]';
|
|
const ADD_MENU_BUTTON = '[data-testid="copilot-add-menu-button"]';
|
|
const USER_MESSAGE = '[data-testid="copilot-user-message"]';
|
|
const ASSISTANT_MESSAGE = '[data-testid="copilot-assistant-message"]';
|
|
|
|
// The canned auto-prompts live in sample-attachment-buttons.tsx — kept in
|
|
// sync here so the user-message bubble assertion stays accurate.
|
|
const IMAGE_PROMPT =
|
|
"can you tell me what is in this demo image I just attached";
|
|
const PDF_PROMPT = "can you tell me what is in this demo pdf I just attached";
|
|
|
|
async function openDemo(page: Page) {
|
|
await page.goto(ROUTE);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="multimodal-demo-root"]'),
|
|
).toBeVisible();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Wait until the sample-injection flow finishes for the nth user message:
|
|
* the user bubble shows up, then the matching assistant response. Returns
|
|
* both locators so the caller can probe for chips and dedup invariants.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function waitForRoundTrip(
|
|
page: Page,
|
|
index = 0,
|
|
): Promise<{
|
|
userMsg: ReturnType<Page["locator"]>;
|
|
asstMsg: ReturnType<Page["locator"]>;
|
|
}> {
|
|
const userMsg = page.locator(USER_MESSAGE).nth(index);
|
|
await expect(userMsg).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
|
|
const asstMsg = page.locator(ASSISTANT_MESSAGE).nth(index);
|
|
await expect(asstMsg).toBeVisible({ timeout: 90_000 });
|
|
return { userMsg, asstMsg };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test.describe("Multimodal Attachments", () => {
|
|
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
|
|
await openDemo(page);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("page loads with sample row, sample buttons, composer, and paperclip", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await expect(
|
|
page.locator('[data-testid="multimodal-sample-row"]'),
|
|
).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.locator(SAMPLE_IMAGE_BTN)).toBeEnabled();
|
|
await expect(page.locator(SAMPLE_PDF_BTN)).toBeEnabled();
|
|
await expect(page.locator(CHAT_TEXTAREA)).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(page.locator(ADD_MENU_BUTTON)).toBeVisible();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("sample image: auto-sends, user msg shows EXACTLY ONE image, assistant references it", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_IMAGE_BTN).click();
|
|
const { userMsg, asstMsg } = await waitForRoundTrip(page);
|
|
|
|
// Auto-prompt landed as the user message body — confirms the
|
|
// useAgent / runAgent path fired and the prompt wasn't eaten.
|
|
await expect(userMsg).toContainText(IMAGE_PROMPT);
|
|
|
|
// Exactly ONE rendered image — pin the dedupe + normalize behavior
|
|
// so the @ag-ui/langgraph round-trip can't quietly start doubling
|
|
// attachments again.
|
|
await expect(userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(1);
|
|
await expect(userMsg.getByText(/Failed to load image/i)).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
|
|
await expect(asstMsg).toContainText(/copilotkit|logo|image/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("sample PDF: auto-sends, user msg shows EXACTLY ONE document chip (not a broken image)", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_PDF_BTN).click();
|
|
const { userMsg, asstMsg } = await waitForRoundTrip(page);
|
|
|
|
await expect(userMsg).toContainText(PDF_PROMPT);
|
|
|
|
// Pinned regression: PDFs round-tripped through @ag-ui/langgraph
|
|
// used to come back as `type: "image"` with `mimeType:
|
|
// application/pdf`, forcing the image renderer to fail load and
|
|
// show "Failed to load image" twice. The page-level dedupe + type-
|
|
// normalize subscriber turns them back into `document` parts so
|
|
// the icon-+-filename renderer fires exactly once.
|
|
await expect(userMsg.getByText(/Failed to load image/i)).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
await expect(userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
// DocumentAttachment surfaces a "PDF" label via getDocumentIcon.
|
|
await expect(userMsg.getByText(/^PDF$/)).toBeVisible();
|
|
|
|
// Pinned regression: the PDF flattened text used to bleed into the
|
|
// rendered user message when the Python middleware mutated state
|
|
// via `before_model`. Switching to `wrap_model_call` scopes the
|
|
// rewrite to the model request only — the bracket-tagged dump must
|
|
// never appear in the UI bubble.
|
|
await expect(userMsg).not.toContainText("[Attached document]");
|
|
|
|
await expect(asstMsg).toContainText(/copilotkit/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("image then PDF in same session: each message keeps its own chip, no doubling", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_IMAGE_BTN).click();
|
|
const first = await waitForRoundTrip(page, 0);
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(1);
|
|
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_PDF_BTN).click();
|
|
const second = await waitForRoundTrip(page, 1);
|
|
|
|
// First message still shows exactly one image — the second send
|
|
// must not re-render or double the prior attachment.
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(1);
|
|
|
|
// Second message is a clean PDF chip.
|
|
await expect(second.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
await expect(second.userMsg.getByText(/Failed to load image/i)).toHaveCount(
|
|
0,
|
|
);
|
|
await expect(second.userMsg.getByText(/^PDF$/)).toBeVisible();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("PDF then image in same session: each message keeps its own chip, no doubling", async ({
|
|
page,
|
|
}) => {
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_PDF_BTN).click();
|
|
const first = await waitForRoundTrip(page, 0);
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.getByText(/^PDF$/)).toBeVisible();
|
|
|
|
await page.locator(SAMPLE_IMAGE_BTN).click();
|
|
const second = await waitForRoundTrip(page, 1);
|
|
|
|
// First message still shows the PDF chip — no contamination.
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.getByText(/^PDF$/)).toBeVisible();
|
|
await expect(first.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(0);
|
|
|
|
// Second message has exactly one image, no broken-image fallback.
|
|
await expect(second.userMsg.locator("img")).toHaveCount(1);
|
|
await expect(second.userMsg.getByText(/Failed to load image/i)).toHaveCount(
|
|
0,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|