Files
2026-07-13 11:59:58 +08:00

150 lines
6.1 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Tests for the error-classification behaviour of `checkAgentName`.
*
* Issue #3041: when the backend returns a non-200 response (e.g. a 500 with
* a database error, a 422 from misbehaving routing, or any other 4xx/5xx
* not in the 502/503/504 set), the UI used to swallow the backend detail
* into a generic "Could not verify name availability" fallback because the
* page-level catch block only handled `reason === "backend_unreachable"`.
*
* The fix carries the raw backend detail as `AgentNameCheckError.detail`
* (distinct from `message`, which always has a non-empty value because
* `checkAgentName` substitutes a generated fallback when the backend sent
* no detail). The UI uses `detail` to decide whether to surface a real
* backend string or fall back to the localised "could not verify" copy.
*
* These tests pin both halves of the contract so a future refactor doesn't
* silently drop the detail or leak the generated fallback into the UI.
*/
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, rs } from "@rstest/core";
rs.mock("@/core/api/fetcher", () => ({
fetch: rs.fn(),
}));
rs.mock("@/core/config", () => ({
getBackendBaseURL: () => "",
}));
import { AgentsApiDisabledError, checkAgentName } from "@/core/agents/api";
import { fetch as fetcher } from "@/core/api/fetcher";
const mockedFetch = rs.mocked(fetcher);
function jsonResponse(status: number, body: unknown): Response {
return new Response(JSON.stringify(body), {
status,
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
});
}
beforeEach(() => {
mockedFetch.mockReset();
});
describe("checkAgentName", () => {
test("returns availability payload on 200", async () => {
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(
jsonResponse(200, { available: true, name: "dealagent" }),
);
const result = await checkAgentName("dealagent");
expect(result).toEqual({ available: true, name: "dealagent" });
});
test("treats network-layer fetch rejection as backend_unreachable", async () => {
mockedFetch.mockRejectedValueOnce(new TypeError("Failed to fetch"));
await expect(checkAgentName("dealagent")).rejects.toMatchObject({
name: "AgentNameCheckError",
reason: "backend_unreachable",
});
});
test.each([502, 503, 504])(
"treats HTTP %i as backend_unreachable",
async (status) => {
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(
jsonResponse(status, { detail: "Bad Gateway" }),
);
await expect(checkAgentName("dealagent")).rejects.toMatchObject({
name: "AgentNameCheckError",
reason: "backend_unreachable",
});
},
);
test("recognises agents_api disabled detail and throws AgentsApiDisabledError", async () => {
const detail =
"Custom-agent management API is disabled. Set agents_api.enabled=true to expose agent and user-profile routes over HTTP.";
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(jsonResponse(403, { detail }));
await expect(checkAgentName("dealagent")).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(
AgentsApiDisabledError,
);
});
test("carries backend 422 detail through AgentNameCheckError.detail (issue #3041)", async () => {
// This is the exact response shape produced by `_validate_agent_name`
// when the user submits a name with disallowed characters — e.g. a
// trailing space, a dot, a Chinese character, or invisible whitespace
// pasted in from another window.
const detail =
"Invalid agent name 'deal agent'. Must match ^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$ (letters, digits, and hyphens only).";
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(jsonResponse(422, { detail }));
await expect(checkAgentName("deal agent")).rejects.toMatchObject({
name: "AgentNameCheckError",
reason: "request_failed",
// The full detail is preserved on both `detail` (for the UI to
// recognise "real backend detail vs generated fallback") and
// `message` (for stack traces / logs).
detail,
message: detail,
});
});
test("falls back to statusText in message but leaves detail null when backend returns no detail", async () => {
// The fallback message must NOT mask the absence of a real backend
// detail — the page-level catch relies on `detail === null` to choose
// the localised generic fallback rather than rendering the bare
// "Failed to check agent name: Internal Server Error" string.
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(
new Response("", { status: 500, statusText: "Internal Server Error" }),
);
await expect(checkAgentName("dealagent")).rejects.toMatchObject({
name: "AgentNameCheckError",
reason: "request_failed",
detail: null,
message: expect.stringContaining("Internal Server Error"),
});
});
test("treats non-string detail as null (defence against future schema drift)", async () => {
// If the backend ever returns `{detail: {code, message}}` (the shape
// used by auth errors today) on this endpoint, we must not surface a
// `[object Object]` string. `detail` should fall back to null so the
// page uses its localised fallback.
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(
jsonResponse(500, { detail: { code: "x", message: "y" } }),
);
await expect(checkAgentName("dealagent")).rejects.toMatchObject({
name: "AgentNameCheckError",
reason: "request_failed",
detail: null,
});
});
test("does not misclassify a 422 with unrelated detail as agents_api disabled", async () => {
// Defence-in-depth: the disabled detector matches on the substring
// "agents_api.enabled", so a 422 whose detail accidentally contains
// the same substring would be misclassified. The validation detail
// produced by `_validate_agent_name` never contains it; this test
// simply asserts that "Invalid agent name ..." stays in the
// request_failed branch, which is where the page now surfaces it.
const detail =
"Invalid agent name 'deal.agent'. Must match ^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$ (letters, digits, and hyphens only).";
mockedFetch.mockResolvedValueOnce(jsonResponse(422, { detail }));
await expect(checkAgentName("deal.agent")).rejects.not.toBeInstanceOf(
AgentsApiDisabledError,
);
});
});