15 KiB
GitHub Event-Driven Agents
GitHub is a webhook-push channel: there is no long-polling worker. Every GitHub App / repository delivery lands at POST /api/webhooks/github, where it is HMAC-verified, fan-out'd to one InboundMessage per matching custom-agent binding, and shipped to the rest of DeerFlow through the same ChannelManager that handles Feishu/Slack/Telegram. For the high-level orientation, see AGENTS.md → "GitHub event-driven agents".
This document covers the architecture of that pipeline:
- Per-agent bindings (
config.yaml→github:block) - Webhook → fan-out →
InboundMessagedispatch - Mention-handle precedence for
require_mentiontriggers preferred_thread_id = UUID5(repo, number, agent_name)thread determinism- GH token lifecycle (
GITHUB_APP_ID+PRIVATE_KEY→run_context["github_token"]→ sandboxGH_TOKEN/GITHUB_TOKEN) ConflictError(HTTP 409) thread-create race recovery- Why outbound is log-only (agents post via
ghfrom their sandbox)
Overview
GitHub bindings are declared per custom agent in users/{owner_user_id}/agents/{agent_name}/config.yaml under a github: block. The global config.yaml channels.github block is intentionally minimal — only the operator kill-switch (enabled) and default_mention_login live there. Everything that identifies "which agent handles which repo" lives next to the agent that owns it.
graph LR
classDef operator fill:#D8CFC4,stroke:#6E6259,color:#2F2A26
classDef agent fill:#E5D2C4,stroke:#806A5B,color:#30251E
classDef route fill:#C9D7D2,stroke:#5D706A,color:#21302C
OperatorYaml["config.yaml<br/>channels.github:<br/> enabled: true<br/> default_mention_login"]:::operator
AgentYaml["agents/{name}/config.yaml<br/>github:<br/> installation_id<br/> bot_login<br/> bindings: [{repo, triggers}]"]:::agent
Registry["build_github_agent_registry()<br/>(mtime-cached, asyncio.to_thread)"]:::route
Webhook["POST /api/webhooks/github<br/>(HMAC verify)"]:::route
OperatorYaml --> Registry
AgentYaml --> Registry
Registry --> Webhook
Each agent binding lists the events it cares about under triggers:. Events absent from triggers: are not delivered to that agent — the dispatcher never loads the agent for them. DEFAULT_TRIGGERS only supplies field-level defaults (e.g. require_mention: true) for events a binding did declare; it is no longer an enablement list.
Webhook → Fan-out → Dispatch
The webhook handler stays cheap — no LangGraph calls — so GitHub's 10-second delivery timeout is never at risk. Verification, fan-out, and the bus publish are all in-process and bounded.
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant GH as GitHub
participant Router as POST /api/webhooks/github<br/>(github_webhooks.py)
participant Disp as fanout_event()<br/>(github/dispatcher.py)
participant Reg as build_github_agent_registry
participant Trg as event_should_fire
participant Bus as MessageBus
participant Mgr as ChannelManager
participant Client as langgraph_sdk client
participant Gateway as Gateway<br/>/api/webhooks/github
GH->>Router: delivery (event, delivery_id, payload,<br/>X-Hub-Signature-256, X-GitHub-Event)
Router->>Router: _verify_signature()<br/>hmac.compare_digest(sha256, secret)
Router->>Disp: fanout_event(bus, event, delivery_id, payload,<br/>operator_default_mention_login)
Disp->>Reg: build_github_agent_registry() (to_thread)
Reg-->>Disp: agents bound to (repo, event)
loop each matched agent
Disp->>Disp: _is_self_event(sender.login)?
alt self event
Disp-->>Disp: skipped (self_event)
else trigger filter
Disp->>Trg: event_should_fire(event, payload, trigger, default_mention_login)
Trg-->>Disp: (fire, reason)
opt fire
Disp->>Disp: build_prompt() + resolve_thread_id()<br/>UUID5(repo, number, agent)
Disp->>Bus: publish_inbound(InboundMessage(<br/>channel=github, chat_id=repo,<br/>topic_id="{number}:{agent}",<br/>owner_user_id=match.user_id,<br/>metadata.agent_name=agent,<br/>metadata.preferred_thread_id=...,<br/>metadata.github={...}))
end
end
end
Disp-->>Router: summary {matched, fired, skipped}
Router-->>GH: 200 OK
Note over Bus,Gateway: Bus consumer side
Bus->>Mgr: msg = get_inbound()
Mgr->>Client: client.threads.create(thread_id=preferred_thread_id)
Client->>Gateway: threads.create (with owner headers)
Gateway-->>Client: thread_id (or 409)
Mgr->>Client: runs.create() [fire_and_forget=True]
Client->>Gateway: start run
Gateway-->>Client: pending
Note over Mgr: Manager returns immediately.<br/>Agent posts to GitHub via gh CLI.
preferred_thread_id = UUID5(...) Thread Determinism
resolve_thread_id(repo, issue_or_pr_number, agent_name) builds a deterministic LangGraph thread id so a (repo, PR/issue number) always lands on the same thread — even after a store wipe, even across gateway replicas (same UUID5 namespace).
graph LR
classDef input fill:#D8CFC4,stroke:#6E6259,color:#2F2A26
classDef hash fill:#D7D3E8,stroke:#6B6680,color:#29263A
classDef thread fill:#C9D7D2,stroke:#5D706A,color:#21302C
Repo["repo<br/>owner/name"]:::input
Number["issue/PR number<br/>int"]:::input
Agent["agent_name<br/>[A-Za-z0-9-]+"]:::input
Seed["seed = '{repo}#{number}:{agent}'"]:::hash
UUID5["uuid.uuid5(<br/> GITHUB_THREAD_NAMESPACE,<br/> seed)"]:::hash
Thread["thread_id<br/>(same across replicas + restarts)"]:::thread
Repo --> Seed
Number --> Seed
Agent --> Seed
Seed --> UUID5 --> Thread
Different agents on the same PR (coder + reviewer) deliberately get different thread ids — agent_name is part of the seed. Sharing a thread would couple their message histories and checkpoints, and multitask_strategy="reject" would silently drop one run on every dual-mention. Each agent owns its own thread; cross-agent coordination flows through GitHub (PR comments, review threads), the source of truth humans see.
ChannelStore uses topic_id = f"{number}:{agent_name}" as its cache key, so each agent's cached mapping is independent — a coder's mapping is invisible to a reviewer on the same PR.
Mention-handle Precedence
For bindings that declare require_mention: true on a given event, the dispatcher must resolve which mention login gates the trigger. The precedence chain is:
graph LR
classDef step fill:#C9D7D2,stroke:#5D706A,color:#21302C
classDef fallback fill:#D7D3E8,stroke:#6B6680,color:#29263A
A["1. trigger.mention_login<br/>(per-event override)"]:::step
B["2. github.bot_login<br/>(agent's App identity)"]:::step
C["3. channels.github.default_mention_login<br/>(operator-wide default)"]:::step
D["4. agent.name<br/>(last-resort fallback)"]:::fallback
Use["effective @mention"]:::step
A -->|"non-empty"| Use
B -->|"non-empty"| Use
C -->|"non-empty"| Use
D --> Use
Whitespace-only values at every level are treated as unset, so the chain falls through cleanly. The _is_self_event gate uses the same precedence (with the agent's whole bindings[*].triggers[*].mention_login aggregated across all bindings, plus an agent.name fallback) so the self-loop gate and the mention gate stay coherent.
GH Token Lifecycle
GitHub Agents get push/write credentials as per-call installation tokens, not as inherited environment. The minted token string is bound into run_context["github_token"] on the bus-consumer side and exposed to the agent's sandbox commands as both GH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN via per-call extra_env on execute_command. No os.environ mutation, no cross-repo bleed.
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Bus as MessageBus
participant Mgr as ChannelManager<br/>_handle_chat_on_thread
participant Pol as inject_github_credentials()<br/>(github/run_policy.py)
participant Auth as mint_installation_token<br/>(github/app_auth.py)
participant GH as GitHub API<br/>(POST /app/installations/{id}/access_tokens)
participant Run as runs.create
participant GW as Gateway runtime
participant Bash as bash_tool
participant Sandbox as Sandbox process
participant Cmd as Sandbox command<br/>(gh / git push)
Bus->>Mgr: msg (channel=github, metadata.github.installation_id)
Mgr->>Pol: _apply_channel_policy(msg, run_context)
Pol->>Auth: mint_installation_token(installation_id)
Auth->>GH: exchange installation_id for token<br/>(JWT signed with PRIVATE_KEY)
GH-->>Auth: {token, expires_at}
Auth-->>Pol: token string (cached ~55min)
Pol->>Mgr: run_context["github_token"] = token
Mgr->>Run: client.runs.create(<br/>thread_id, assistant_id,<br/>context={..., github_token})
Run->>GW: POST /threads/{id}/runs
GW-->>Run: pending
Run-->>Mgr: returns once pending
Note over Mgr: Manager returns immediately (fire_and_forget)
Note over GW,Bash: Harness side
GW->>Bash: bash_tool call<br/>cmd="git push https://x-access-token:$GH_TOKEN@..."
Bash->>Sandbox: execute_command(<br/>env={"GH_TOKEN": "...",<br/> "GITHUB_TOKEN": "..."})
Note over Sandbox: AioSandbox: bash.exec(env=...) on fresh session<br/>LocalSandbox: subprocess.run(env=...)
Sandbox->>Cmd: gh pr comment / git push / etc.
Cmd->>GH: authenticated GitHub API call
Why a string and not a closure: run_context is JSON-encoded by the langgraph_sdk HTTP client before reaching Gateway. A Python callable does not survive that serialization. The harness side (_github_env_from_runtime) already accepts either shape, but only str round-trips through the SDK transport.
Token TTL caveat: GitHub installation tokens are valid for ~1 hour. Most agent runs finish well inside that window. Truly long coder runs (multi-hour refactors at the higher recursion_limit=250 ceiling) may see a 401 on a late git push / gh pr create. Auto-refresh past the 1h TTL is intentionally deferred — it requires registering a token-provider lookup on the harness side, which crosses the harness/app boundary (tests/test_harness_boundary.py). Until refresh ships, long runs should finish GitHub writes before expiry or accept the loss. If minting fails (bad App id, wrong installation_id, missing private key), the agent still runs without push/write credentials — read-only is better than no response.
Thread-create Race Recovery
Two webhook deliveries for the same (repo, number) can land within milliseconds of each other and race on threads.create(thread_id=preferred_thread_id). The recovery is narrow by design.
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Mgr1 as ChannelManager<br/>(delivery 1)
participant Mgr2 as ChannelManager<br/>(delivery 2)
participant Client as langgraph_sdk client
participant Gateway as Gateway<br/>threads.create
par concurrent deliveries
Mgr1->>Client: client.threads.create(thread_id=preferred)
Client->>Gateway: POST /threads {thread_id}
and
Mgr2->>Client: client.threads.create(thread_id=preferred)
Client->>Gateway: POST /threads {thread_id}
end
Gateway-->>Client: 200 OK (first writer wins)
Gateway-->>Client: 409 ConflictError (second writer)
Client-->>Mgr1: thread (created)
Client-->>Mgr2: ConflictError
Note over Mgr2: Recovery branch
Mgr2->>Client: threads.get(preferred_thread_id)
alt existing
Client-->>Mgr2: thread
Mgr2->>Mgr2: _store_thread_id(msg, preferred_thread_id)
Mgr2-->>Mgr2: reuse deterministic id
else also missing
Client-->>Mgr2: error
Mgr2->>Mgr2: raise (do NOT cache the mapping)
end
The recovery is narrow: only langgraph_sdk.errors.ConflictError (HTTP 409) is treated as a concurrent-create collision. Any other failure (transient DB outage, network error, 5xx) propagates so the delivery can fail/retry rather than silently caching preferred_thread_id into the store and mapping every future webhook on this issue/PR to a thread that was never created (every later run would 404 forever with no retry path).
The follow-up threads.get(preferred_thread_id) is itself verified before caching — if it also rejects, the store underneath is in an inconsistent state and the failure surfaces.
Outbound is Log-only
graph LR
classDef agent fill:#E5D2C4,stroke:#806A5B,color:#30251E
classDef send fill:#C9D7D2,stroke:#5D706A,color:#21302C
classDef gh fill:#D7D3E8,stroke:#6B6680,color:#29263A
Run["GitHub agent run"]:::agent
GhCLI["gh CLI<br/>(in sandbox)"]:::gh
Issue["GitHub issue / PR"]:::gh
Channel["GitHubChannel.send()<br/>(log-only)"]:::send
Log["gateway.log<br/>(INFO line)"]:::send
Run -->|"mid-run intentional writeback"| GhCLI --> Issue
Run -->|"final assistant message"| Channel --> Log
GitHub agents post to GitHub themselves via the gh CLI from inside their sandbox (gh issue comment, gh pr comment, gh pr create, etc.). The channel's send() is log-only by design — the agent's final assistant message is logged at INFO for visibility but never auto-posted.
Why:
- Multiple agents can bind the same event. coder + reviewer on a mention would each auto-post a reply, producing two replies per mention even when only one had useful work. Letting the LLM call
ghmid-run means silence is just "the LLM did not callgh". - The agent often wants to post intermediate updates (an issue comment linking the PR, a sub-issue comment, a PR description edit). The auto-post-the-final-message contract didn't model that and forced the final message to play double duty.
- The dispatcher's per-agent
_is_self_eventgate already prevents comments the LLM posts viaghfrom looping the webhook back into a new run for the same agent.
This is also why the GitHub channel registers ChannelRunPolicy.fire_and_forget=True: the manager calls runs.create() and returns once the run is pending, no outbound ferrying, no SDK 300s httpx.ReadTimeout on a legitimate long coder run.
Cross-references
- AGENTS.md → "GitHub event-driven agents" — the index view in
backend/AGENTS.md(binding shape, per-event triggers, mention precedence, token env summary) - IM_CHANNEL_CONNECTIONS.md — interactive IM channels (Telegram/Slack/etc.) for the full
_handle_chatand owner-scoped file storage flow app/gateway/github/dispatcher.py—fanout_event,_is_self_event, mention precedence chainapp/gateway/github/identity.py—resolve_thread_id(UUID5),extract_targetapp/gateway/github/triggers.py—event_should_fire,DEFAULT_TRIGGERSapp/gateway/github/run_policy.py—inject_github_credentials,register_policyapp/gateway/routers/github_webhooks.py— HMAC verify, route mount predicateapp/channels/github.py—GitHubChannel(log-only outbound)