wehub-resource-sync
458 lines
29 KiB
Python
458 lines
29 KiB
Python
SYSTEM_PROMPT_MULTI = '''You are a Web Information Seeking Master. Your task is to thoroughly seek the internet for information and provide accurate answers to questions. No matter how complex the query, you will not give up until you find the corresponding information.
|
||
|
||
As you proceed, adhere to the following principles:
|
||
|
||
1. **Persistent Actions for Answers**: You will engage in many interactions, delving deeply into the topic to explore all possible aspects until a satisfactory answer is found.
|
||
|
||
2. **Repeated Verification**: Before presenting a Final Answer, you will **cross-check** and **validate the information** you've gathered to confirm its accuracy and reliability.
|
||
|
||
3. **Attention to Detail**: You will carefully analyze each information source to ensure that all data is current, relevant, and from credible origins.'''
|
||
|
||
|
||
EXTRACTOR_PROMPT = """Please process the following webpage content and user goal to extract relevant information:
|
||
|
||
## **Webpage Content**
|
||
{webpage_content}
|
||
|
||
## **User Goal**
|
||
{goal}
|
||
|
||
## **Task Guidelines**
|
||
1. **Content Scanning for Rational**: Locate the **specific sections/data** directly related to the user's goal within the webpage content
|
||
2. **Key Extraction for Evidence**: Identify and extract the **most relevant information** from the content, you never miss any important information, output the **full original context** of the content as far as possible, it can be more than three paragraphs.
|
||
3. **Summary Output for Summary**: Organize into a concise paragraph with logical flow, prioritizing clarity and judge the contribution of the information to the goal.
|
||
|
||
**Final Output Format using JSON format has "rational", "evidence", "summary" feilds**
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
|
||
USER_PROMPT = """A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the assistant solves it by calling one or more of the following tools.
|
||
<tools>
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "search",
|
||
"description": "Performs batched web searches: supply an array 'query'; the tool retrieves the top 10 results for each query in one call.",
|
||
"parameters": {
|
||
"type": "object",
|
||
"properties": {
|
||
"query": {
|
||
"type": "array",
|
||
"items": {
|
||
"type": "string"
|
||
},
|
||
"description": "Array of query strings. Include multiple complementary search queries in a single call."
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"required": [
|
||
"query"
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"name": "visit",
|
||
"description": "Visit webpage(s) and return the summary of the content.",
|
||
"parameters": {
|
||
"type": "object",
|
||
"properties": {
|
||
"url": {
|
||
"type": "array",
|
||
"items": {"type": "string"},
|
||
"description": "The URL(s) of the webpage(s) to visit. Can be a single URL or an array of URLs."
|
||
},
|
||
"goal": {
|
||
"type": "string",
|
||
"description": "The specific information goal for visiting webpage(s)."
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
"required": [
|
||
"url",
|
||
"goal"
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
</tools>
|
||
|
||
The assistant starts with one or more cycles of (thinking about which tool to use -> performing tool call -> waiting for tool response), and ends with (thinking about the answer -> answer of the question). The thinking processes, tool calls, tool responses, and answer are enclosed within their tags. There could be multiple thinking processes, tool calls, tool call parameters and tool response parameters.
|
||
|
||
Example response:
|
||
<think> thinking process here </think>
|
||
<tool_call>
|
||
{"name": "tool name here", "arguments": {"parameter name here": parameter value here, "another parameter name here": another parameter value here, ...}}
|
||
</tool_call>
|
||
<tool_response>
|
||
tool_response here
|
||
</tool_response>
|
||
<think> thinking process here </think>
|
||
<tool_call>
|
||
{"name": "another tool name here", "arguments": {...}}
|
||
</tool_call>
|
||
<tool_response>
|
||
tool_response here
|
||
</tool_response>
|
||
(more thinking processes, tool calls and tool responses here)
|
||
<think> thinking process here </think>
|
||
<answer> answer here </answer>
|
||
|
||
User: """
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_GAIA = """You are an evaluation assistant. Please determine if the predicted answer is equivalent to the labeled answer.
|
||
|
||
Question: {question}
|
||
|
||
Labeled Answer: {correct_answer}
|
||
|
||
Predicted Answer: {response}
|
||
|
||
Did the model give an answer **equivalent** to the labeled answer? Please respond with "Correct" if they are equivalent, or "Incorrect" if they are not equivalent. Do not include any other text.
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_BC_zh = """
|
||
请根据给定问题、标准答案和模型预测的答案来评估模型的回答是否正确。您的任务是将结果评定为：【正确】、【错误】。
|
||
|
||
首先，我们将列出每个评定类别的示例，然后请您对新问题的预测答案进行评定。
|
||
以下是【正确】的答复示例：
|
||
```
|
||
问题：贝拉克·奥巴马的孩子叫什么名字？
|
||
标准答案：玛丽亚·奥巴马和萨莎·奥巴马
|
||
模型预测1：Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
模型预测2：玛丽亚和萨沙
|
||
模型预测3：大多数人会说是玛丽亚和萨莎，但我不确定，需要再确认
|
||
模型预测4：巴拉克·奥巴马有两个女儿，她们分别是玛丽亚·安和娜塔莎·玛丽安，但通常称作玛丽亚·奥巴马和萨莎·奥巴马。
|
||
```
|
||
这些答复均为【正确】，因为：
|
||
- 完整地包含了标准答案中的重要信息。
|
||
- 不包含任何与标准答案矛盾的信息。
|
||
- 只关注语义内容，中英文，大小写、标点、语法和顺序不重要。
|
||
- 答复中出现模糊语句或猜测是可以接受的，前提是包含了标准答案且不含有不正确信息或矛盾。
|
||
|
||
以下是【错误】的答复示例：
|
||
```
|
||
问题：巴拉克·奥巴马的孩子叫什么名字？
|
||
标准答案：玛丽亚·奥巴马和萨莎·奥巴马
|
||
模型预测1：玛丽亚
|
||
模型预测2：玛丽亚、萨莎和苏珊和萨莎·奥巴马或玛丽亚·奥巴马，或娜塔莎·玛丽安，或爱因斯坦
|
||
模型预测3：虽然我不知道他们的确切名字，但能说出巴拉克·奥巴马有两个孩子。
|
||
模型预测4：你可能是想说贝茜和奥利维亚。不过您应通过最新的参考资料确认详细信息。那是正确的答案吗？
|
||
模型预测5：巴拉克·奥巴马的孩子
|
||
```
|
||
这些答复均为【错误】，因为：
|
||
- 答复中包含与标准答案矛盾的事实陈述。
|
||
- 答案为空、重复表述问题。
|
||
- 答案枚举了多个答案，重复表述答案。
|
||
|
||
需要格外注意的是：
|
||
- 标准答案中包含对于问题中多个方面的回答，并且在同一个方面的答案中可能会有多种不同的描述，这些描述均是正确的，并且在同一个括号中给出，通过逗号连接。例如，考虑问题"抖音自己的人工智能大模型叫什么名字？"，标准答案为"【【豆包，云雀】】"：
|
||
- 预测答案"豆包"、"豆包、云雀"、"云雀"等均为【正确】。
|
||
- 对于标准答案中包含的不同方面的回答，模型需要同时给出所有方面的回答才可以算是正确，否则直接判断为【错误】，不存在【部分正确】这种输出方式，这些答案会在不同的括号中给出。例如，考虑问题"TFBOYS组合中的成员有哪些？"，标准答案为"【【王俊凯】【王源】【易洋千玺】】"：
|
||
- 预测答案"王俊凯、王源、易洋千玺"等同时包含所有答案，才可以算为【正确】。
|
||
- 预测答案为"王俊凯、易洋千玺"等没有同时包含所有答案，会被算为【错误】。
|
||
|
||
另外注意以下几点：
|
||
- 对于标准答案为数字的问题，预测答案应和标准答案一致。例如，考虑问题"金山铁路黄浦江特大桥的全长是多少米？"，标准答案为"3518.17"：
|
||
- 预测答案"3518"、"3518.1"、"3518.17"均为【正确】。
|
||
- 预测答案"3520"和"3600"均为【错误】。
|
||
- 如果模型预测并没有直接回答问题，模型试图绕过或未能直接给出标准答案视为【错误】答案。
|
||
- 例如：问题"林宥嘉的老婆是谁"，标准答案为"丁文琪"。模型预测"林宥嘉的老婆"、"林宥嘉的老婆应该很优秀"、"林宥嘉的老婆可能是某个公众人物"均为【错误】。
|
||
- 如果标准答案包含比问题更多的信息，预测答案只需包含问题中提到的信息。
|
||
- 例如，考虑问题"菱镁矿的主要化学成分是什么？"标准答案为"碳酸镁（MgCO3）"。"碳酸镁"或"MgCO3"均视为【正确】答案。
|
||
- 如果从问题中明显可以推断出预测答案省略的信息，那么算作正确。
|
||
- 例如，问题"巴鲁米尼的努拉吉遗迹在1997年被联合国教科文组织列为世界文化遗产，那么这遗址在哪个地区？"标准答案为"意大利撒丁岛"，预测答案"撒丁岛"被视为【正确】。
|
||
- 如果能明显看出名字翻译版本不同但是是同一个人也认为正确。
|
||
- 例如，如果标准答案是"Robinson"，那么回答鲁滨逊或者鲁滨孙均正确。
|
||
- 你应该更关注标准答案和模型预测的匹配度，而不是关心标准答案是否是正确的。
|
||
|
||
下面是一个新的问题示例。请只回复【正确】、【错误】之一，不要道歉或纠正自己的错误，只需要评估该回答。
|
||
```
|
||
问题: {question}
|
||
标准答案: {correct_answer}
|
||
预测答案: {response}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
将此新问题的预测答案评定为以下之一：
|
||
A.【正确】
|
||
B.【错误】
|
||
|
||
只返回【正确】、【错误】所代表的选项即可，即仅返回A或B即可，无须添加任何其他的文本。
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_BC_en = """
|
||
Based on the given question, standard answer, and model-predicted answer, evaluate whether the model's response is correct. Your task is to classify the result as: [CORRECT] or [INCORRECT].
|
||
|
||
First, we'll list examples for each category, then you'll evaluate a new question's predicted answer.
|
||
Here are examples of [CORRECT] responses:
|
||
```
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama's children?
|
||
Standard Answer: Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
Model Prediction 1: Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
Model Prediction 2: Malia and Sasha
|
||
Model Prediction 3: Most would say Malia and Sasha, but I'm not sure, I should verify
|
||
Model Prediction 4: Barack Obama has two daughters, Malia Ann and Natasha Marian, commonly known as Malia Obama and Sasha Obama.
|
||
```
|
||
These responses are all [CORRECT] because they:
|
||
- Fully include the important information from the standard answer.
|
||
- Don't contain any information that contradicts the standard answer.
|
||
- Focus only on semantic content; language, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, and order aren't important.
|
||
- Vague statements or guesses are acceptable as long as they include the standard answer and don't contain incorrect information or contradictions.
|
||
|
||
Here are examples of [INCORRECT] responses:
|
||
```
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama's children?
|
||
Standard Answer: Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
Model Prediction 1: Malia
|
||
Model Prediction 2: Malia, Sasha and Susan or Sasha Obama or Malia Obama, or Natasha Marian, or Einstein
|
||
Model Prediction 3: While I don't know their exact names, I can tell you Barack Obama has two children.
|
||
Model Prediction 4: You might be thinking of Betsy and Olivia. But you should verify the details with the latest references. Is that the correct answer?
|
||
Model Prediction 5: Barack Obama's children
|
||
```
|
||
These responses are all [INCORRECT] because they:
|
||
- Contain factual statements that contradict the standard answer.
|
||
- Are empty or merely repeat the question.
|
||
- Enumerate multiple answers or repeat the answer.
|
||
|
||
Pay special attention to the following:
|
||
- The standard answer may contain responses to multiple aspects of the question, and within the same aspect, there might be different descriptions, all of which are correct and are given in the same bracket, connected by commas. For example, for the question "What is the name of ByteDance's AI model?", the standard answer is "[[Doubao, Skylark]]":
|
||
- Predicted answers "Doubao", "Doubao, Skylark", "Skylark", etc. are all [CORRECT].
|
||
- For standard answers containing responses to different aspects, the model needs to provide answers to all aspects to be considered correct; otherwise, it's directly judged as [INCORRECT]. There is no [PARTIALLY CORRECT] output option. These answers will be given in different brackets. For example, for the question "Who are the members of TFBOYS?", the standard answer is "[[Wang Junkai][Wang Yuan][Yi Yangqianxi]]":
|
||
- Predicted answers like "Wang Junkai, Wang Yuan, Yi Yangqianxi" that include all answers are [CORRECT].
|
||
- Predicted answers like "Wang Junkai, Yi Yangqianxi" that don't include all answers are [INCORRECT].
|
||
|
||
Also note the following points:
|
||
- For questions with numerical standard answers, the predicted answer should match the standard answer. For example, for the question "What is the total length in meters of the Huangpu River Bridge on the Jinshan Railway?", the standard answer is "3518.17":
|
||
- Predicted answers "3518", "3518.1", "3518.17" are all [CORRECT].
|
||
- Predicted answers "3520" and "3600" are [INCORRECT].
|
||
- If the model prediction doesn't directly answer the question, attempts to circumvent or fails to directly provide the standard answer, it's considered an [INCORRECT] answer.
|
||
- For example, for the question "Who is JJ Lin's wife?", with the standard answer "Ding Wenqi", model predictions like "JJ Lin's wife", "JJ Lin's wife should be excellent", "JJ Lin's wife might be a public figure" are all [INCORRECT].
|
||
- If the standard answer contains more information than the question asks for, the predicted answer only needs to include the information mentioned in the question.
|
||
- For example, for the question "What is the main chemical component of magnesite?", with the standard answer "Magnesium carbonate (MgCO3)", "Magnesium carbonate" or "MgCO3" are both considered [CORRECT] answers.
|
||
- If information omitted in the predicted answer can be clearly inferred from the question, it's considered correct.
|
||
- For example, for the question "The Nuragic ruins of Barumini were listed as a World Cultural Heritage by UNESCO in 1997, so where is this site located?", with the standard answer "Sardinia, Italy", the predicted answer "Sardinia" is considered [CORRECT].
|
||
- If it's clear that different translations of a name refer to the same person, it's considered correct.
|
||
- For example, if the standard answer is "Robinson", answers like "Lubinson" or "Lubinsun" are both correct.
|
||
- You should focus more on the match between the standard answer and the model prediction, rather than whether the standard answer itself is correct.
|
||
|
||
Below is a new question example. Please reply with only [CORRECT] or [INCORRECT], without apologies or corrections to your own errors, just evaluate the answer.
|
||
```
|
||
Question: {question}
|
||
Standard Answer: {correct_answer}
|
||
Predicted Answer: {response}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Evaluate this new question's predicted answer as one of the following:
|
||
A. [CORRECT]
|
||
B. [INCORRECT]
|
||
|
||
Return only the option representing [CORRECT] or [INCORRECT], i.e., just return A or B, without adding any other text.
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_QA = """
|
||
Your job is to look at a question, a gold target, and a predicted answer, and then assign a grade of either ["CORRECT", "INCORRECT", "NOT_ATTEMPTED"].
|
||
First, I will give examples of each grade, and then you will grade a new example.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of CORRECT predicted answers.
|
||
```
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama's children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
Predicted answer 1: sasha and malia obama
|
||
Predicted answer 2: most people would say Malia and Sasha, but I'm not sure and would have to double check
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Barack Obama has two daughters. Their names are Malia Ann and Natasha Marian, but they are commonly referred to as Malia Obama and Sasha Obama. Malia was born on July 4, 1998, and Sasha was born on June 10, 2001.
|
||
```
|
||
These predicted answers are all CORRECT because:
|
||
- They fully contain the important information in the gold target.
|
||
- They do not contain any information that contradicts the gold target.
|
||
- Only semantic meaning matters; capitalization, punctuation, grammar, and order don't matter.
|
||
- Hedging and guessing are permissible, provided that the gold target is fully included and the response contains no incorrect information or contradictions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of INCORRECT predicted answers.
|
||
```
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama's children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia and Sasha
|
||
Predicted answer 1: Malia.
|
||
Predicted answer 2: Malia, Sasha, and Susan.
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Barack Obama does not have any children.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: I think it's either Malia and Sasha. Or it could be Malia and Jackie. Or it could be Joey and Malia.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: While I don't know their exact names, I can tell you that Barack Obama has three children.
|
||
Predicted answer 5: It's possible you may mean Betsy and Olivia. However, you should clarify further details with updated references if necessary. Is that the correct answer?
|
||
Predicted answer 6: It may be the case that Obama's child is named James. However, it's recommended to confirm the most accurate and updated information since this could change over time. This model may not always reflect the most current information.
|
||
```
|
||
These predicted answers are all INCORRECT because:
|
||
- A factual statement in the answer contradicts the gold target. Incorrect statements that have some hedging (e.g., "it is possible that", "although i'm not sure, i think") are also considered incorrect.
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of NOT_ATTEMPTED predicted answers.
|
||
```
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama's children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia and Sasha
|
||
Predicted answer 1: I don't know.
|
||
Predicted answer 2: I need more context about which Obama you are talking about.
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Without researching the web, I cannot answer this question. However, I can tell you that Barack Obama has two children.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: Barack Obama has two children. I know that one of them is Malia, but I'm not sure about the other one.
|
||
```
|
||
These predicted answers are all NOT_ATTEMPTED because:
|
||
- The important information in the gold target is not included in the answer.
|
||
- No statements in the answer contradict the gold target.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Also note the following things:
|
||
- For grading questions where the gold target is a number, the predicted answer needs to be correct to the last significant figure in the gold answer. For example, consider a question "How many citations does the Transformer Paper have?" with gold target "120k".
|
||
- Predicted answers "120k", "124k", and 115k" are all CORRECT.
|
||
- Predicted answers "100k" and "113k" are INCORRECT.
|
||
- Predicted answers "around 100k" and "more than 50k" are considered NOT_ATTEMPTED because they neither confirm nor contradict the gold target.
|
||
- The gold target may contain more information than the question. In such cases, the predicted answer only needs to contain the information that is in the question.
|
||
- For example, consider the question "What episode did Derek and Meredith get legally married in Grey's Anatomy?" with gold target "Season 7, Episode 20: White Wedding". Either "Season 7, Episode 20" or "White Wedding" would be considered a CORRECT answer.
|
||
- Do not punish predicted answers if they omit information that would be clearly inferred from the question.
|
||
- For example, consider the question "What city is OpenAI headquartered in?" and the gold target "San Francisco, California". The predicted answer "San Francisco" would be considered CORRECT, even though it does not include "California".
|
||
- Consider the question "What award did A pretrainer's guide to training data: Measuring the effects of data age, domain coverage, quality, & toxicity win at NAACL '24?", the gold target is "Outstanding Paper Award". The predicted answer "Outstanding Paper" would be considered CORRECT, because "award" is presumed in the question.
|
||
- For the question "What is the height of Jason Wei in meters?", the gold target is "1.73 m". The predicted answer "1.75" would be considered CORRECT, because meters is specified in the question.
|
||
- For the question "What is the name of Barack Obama's wife?", the gold target is "Michelle Obama". The predicted answer "Michelle" would be considered CORRECT, because the last name can be presumed.
|
||
- Do not punish for typos in people's name if it's clearly the same name.
|
||
- For example, if the gold target is "Hyung Won Chung", you can consider the following predicted answers as correct: "Hyoong Won Choong", "Hyungwon Chung", or "Hyun Won Chung".
|
||
|
||
|
||
Here is a new example. Simply reply with either CORRECT, INCORRECT, NOT ATTEMPTED. Don't apologize or correct yourself if there was a mistake; we are just trying to grade the answer.
|
||
```
|
||
Question: {question}
|
||
Gold target: {correct_answer}
|
||
Predicted answer: {response}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Grade the predicted answer of this new question as one of:
|
||
A: CORRECT
|
||
B: INCORRECT
|
||
C: NOT_ATTEMPTED
|
||
|
||
Just return the letters "A", "B", or "C", with no text around it.
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_CONFIDENCE = """Judge whether the following [response] to [question] is correct or not based on the precise and unambiguous [correct_answer] below.
|
||
|
||
[question]: {question}
|
||
|
||
[response]: {response}
|
||
|
||
Your judgement must be in the format and criteria specified below:
|
||
|
||
extracted_final_answer: The final exact answer extracted from the [response]. Put the extracted answer as 'None' if there is no exact, final answer to extract from the response.
|
||
|
||
[correct_answer]: {correct_answer}
|
||
|
||
reasoning: Explain why the extracted_final_answer is correct or incorrect based on [correct_answer], focusing only on if there are meaningful differences between [correct_answer] and the extracted_final_answer. Do not comment on any background to the problem, do not attempt to solve the problem, do not argue for any answer different than [correct_answer], focus only on whether the answers match.
|
||
|
||
correct: Answer 'yes' if extracted_final_answer matches the [correct_answer] given above, or is within a small margin of error for numerical problems. Answer 'no' otherwise, i.e. if there if there is any inconsistency, ambiguity, non-equivalency, or if the extracted answer is incorrect.
|
||
|
||
confidence: The extracted confidence score between 0|\%| and 100|\%| from [response]. Put 100 if there is no confidence score available.
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_SEAL0_QA = """
|
||
Your job is to look at a question, a gold target, and a predicted answer, and then assign a grade of either ["CORRECT", "INCORRECT", "NOT_ATTEMPTED"].
|
||
First, I will give examples of each grade, and then you will grade a new example.
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of CORRECT predicted answers.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama’s children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia Obama and Sasha Obama
|
||
Predicted answer 1: sasha and malia obama
|
||
Predicted answer 2: most people would say Malia and Sasha, but I’m not sure and would have to double check
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Barack Obama has two daughters. Their names are Malia Ann and Natasha Marian, but they are commonly referred to as Malia Obama and Sasha Obama. Malia was born on July 4, 1998, and Sasha was born on June 10, 2001.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
These predicted answers are all CORRECT because:
|
||
- They fully contain the important information in the gold target.
|
||
- They do not contain any information that contradicts the gold target.
|
||
- Only semantic meaning matters; capitalization, punctuation, grammar, and order don’t matter.
|
||
- Hedging and guessing are permissible, provided that the gold target is fully included and the response contains no incorrect information or contradictions.
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of INCORRECT predicted answers.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama’s children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia and Sasha
|
||
Predicted answer 1: Malia.
|
||
Predicted answer 2: Malia, Sasha, and Susan.
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Barack Obama does not have any children.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: I think it’s either Malia and Sasha. Or it could be Malia and Jackie. Or it could be Joey and Malia.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: While I don’t know their exact names, I can tell you that Barack Obama has three children.
|
||
Predicted answer 5: It’s possible you may mean Betsy and Olivia. However, you should clarify further details with updated references if necessary. Is that the correct answer?
|
||
Predicted answer 6: It may be the case that Obama’s child is named James. However, it’s recommended to confirm the most accurate and updated information since this could change over time. This model may not always reflect the most current information.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
These predicted answers are all INCORRECT because:
|
||
- A factual statement in the answer contradicts the gold target. Incorrect statements that have some hedging (e.g., "it is possible that", "although i’m not sure, i think") are also considered incorrect.
|
||
|
||
The following are examples of NOT_ATTEMPTED predicted answers.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
Question: What are the names of Barack Obama’s children?
|
||
Gold target: Malia and Sasha
|
||
Predicted answer 1: I don’t know.
|
||
Predicted answer 2: I need more context about which Obama you are talking about.
|
||
Predicted answer 3: Without researching the web, I cannot answer this question. However, I can tell you that Barack Obama has two children.
|
||
Predicted answer 4: Barack Obama has two children. I know that one of them is Malia, but I’m not sure about the other one.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
These predicted answers are all NOT_ATTEMPTED because:
|
||
- The important information in the gold target is not included in the answer.
|
||
- No statements in the answer contradict the gold target.
|
||
|
||
Also note the following things:
|
||
- The gold target may contain more information than the question. In such cases, the predicted answer only needs to contain the information that is in the question.
|
||
- For example, consider the question "What episode did Derek and Meredith get legally married in Grey’s Anatomy?" with gold target "Season 7, Episode 20: White Wedding". Either "Season 7, Episode 20" or "White Wedding" would be considered a CORRECT answer.
|
||
- Do not punish predicted answers if they omit information that would be clearly inferred from the question.
|
||
- For example, consider the question "What city is OpenAI headquartered in?" and the gold target "San Francisco, California". The predicted answer "San Francisco" would be considered CORRECT, even though it does not include " California".
|
||
- Consider the question "What award did A pretrainer’s guide to training data: Measuring the effects of data age, domain coverage, quality, & toxicity win at NAACL ’24?", the gold target is "Outstanding Paper Award". The predicted answer "Outstanding Paper" would be considered CORRECT, because "award" is presumed in the question.
|
||
- Do not give credit for an answer if it contains any internal inconsistency.
|
||
- For example, consider the question: "How many NBA players have scored 60 or more points in a regular season game since 2024?" with the gold answer "8". A response is INCORRECT if it states "8 players" but lists 7 or 9, or if it initially says "8 players" but later contradicts this by concluding 7 or 9.
|
||
|
||
Here is a new example. Simply reply with either CORRECT, INCORRECT, NOT ATTEMPTED. Don’t apologize or correct yourself if there was a mistake; we are just trying to grade the answer.
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
Question: {question}
|
||
Gold target: {correct_answer}
|
||
Predicted answer: {response}
|
||
‘‘‘
|
||
Grade the predicted answer of this new question as one of:
|
||
A: CORRECT
|
||
B: INCORRECT
|
||
C: NOT_ATTEMPTED
|
||
|
||
Just return the letters "A", "B", or "C", with no text around it.
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_XBENCH = """
|
||
你是一个通用人工智能助手。根据下面给出的[正确答案], 判断以下对[原问题]的[回答]的回答是否正确。
|
||
|
||
[原问题]: {question}
|
||
|
||
[正确答案]: {correct_answer}
|
||
|
||
[回答]:{response}
|
||
|
||
你的判断必须按照以下格式和标准进行:
|
||
|
||
最终答案: 从[回答]中提取出的最终准确答案。如果[回答]中没有明确的最终答案, 则填写'无'。
|
||
|
||
解释: 根据[正确]解释为什么[最终答案]是正确的或错误的。只关注[最终答案]与[正确答案]之间是否存在实质性差异, 不要评论题目的背景, 不要尝试重新解题, 不要为任何不同于[正确答案]的答案辩护, 只专注于判断答案是否一致。
|
||
|
||
结论: 如果[最终答案]与上方给出的[正确答案]一致, 或者在数值题目中处于可接受的微小误差范围内, 则填写'正确'; 否则（即存在任何不一致、歧义、不等价或提取出的答案错误的情况）填写'错误'。
|
||
""".strip()
|
||
|
||
|
||
JUDGE_PROMPT_BROWSECOMP_OFFICIAL = """Judge whether the following [response] to [question] is correct or not based on the precise and unambiguous [correct_answer] below.
|
||
|
||
[question]: {question}
|
||
|
||
[response]: {response}
|
||
|
||
Your judgement must be in the format and criteria specified below:
|
||
|
||
extracted_final_answer: The final exact answer extracted from the [response]. Put the extracted answer as 'None' if there is no exact, final answer to extract from the response.
|
||
|
||
[correct_answer]: {correct_answer}
|
||
|
||
reasoning: Explain why the extracted_final_answer is correct or incorrect based on [correct_answer], focusing only on if there are meaningful differences between [correct_answer] and the extracted_final_answer. Do not comment on any background to the problem, do not attempt to solve the problem, do not argue for any answer different than [correct_answer], focus only on whether the answers match.
|
||
|
||
correct: Answer 'yes' if extracted_final_answer matches the [correct_answer] given above, or is within a small margin of error for numerical problems. Answer 'no' otherwise, i.e. if there if there is any inconsistency, ambiguity, non-equivalency, or if the extracted answer is incorrect.
|
||
|
||
confidence: The extracted confidence score between 0|\%| and 100|\%| from [response]. Put 100 if there is no confidence score available.
|
||
""".strip() |