Files
yao-meta-skill/scripts/skill_report_i18n.py
T
YAO 31ce04c655 Split meta skill CLI and review gates
Merge the beta-ready Yao Meta Skill architecture, report, evidence gate, and release-boundary updates.\n\nRelease boundary: beta/public testing is allowed; formal world-class, fully reviewed, or superiority claims remain blocked until the pending evidence gates are accepted.
2026-06-17 18:43:02 +08:00

387 lines
31 KiB
Python

"""Bilingual text helpers for the static skill overview report."""
import html
import re
SCRIPT_INTERFACE = "internal-module"
SCRIPT_INTERFACE_REASON = "Imported by render_skill_overview.py to keep bilingual report copy and fallback rules out of HTML rendering."
TEXT_ZH = {
"Create, refactor, evaluate, and package agent skills from workflows, prompts, transcripts, docs, or notes. Use when asked to create a skill, turn a repeated process into a reusable skill, improve an existing skill, add evals, or package a skill for team reuse.": "从工作流、提示词、对话记录、文档或笔记中创建、重构、评估和打包 agent skill;适用于新建 Skill、沉淀重复流程、改进现有 Skill、补充 eval 或团队复用打包。",
"Understand the request.": "理解用户请求。",
"Execute the main task.": "执行核心任务。",
"Validate the result.": "校验交付结果。",
"Understand the request": "理解用户请求。",
"Execute the main task": "执行核心任务。",
"Validate the result": "校验交付结果。",
"Decide whether the request should become a skill and choose the lightest fit.": "判断请求是否应该沉淀为 Skill,并选择最轻量可靠的模式。",
"Capture job, output, exclusions, constraints, and standards.": "捕捉任务、输出、排除项、约束和质量标准。",
"Run reference scan: external benchmarks first, user references second, local fit third; surface only uncertainty or conflict.": "运行参考扫描:先看外部 benchmark,再看用户材料,最后校验本地适配;只暴露不确定性或冲突。",
"Write the `description` early and test route quality before expanding the package.": "尽早写出 `description`,先测试路由质量,再扩展包体。",
"Add output-risk, artifact-design, prompt-quality, and system-model reports only when they matter.": "只在确有价值时添加 output-risk、artifact-design、prompt-quality 和 system-model 报告。",
"Use $yao-meta-skill to turn my workflow or notes into a reusable skill with lean structure, clear triggering, and the right evals.": "当你需要把工作流或笔记沉淀成结构精简、触发清晰且带必要 eval 的可复用 Skill 时使用 $yao-meta-skill。",
"Turn rough requests into a compact reusable demo skill.": "把粗糙请求整理成紧凑、可复用的演示 Skill。",
"Tighten trigger and exclusions": "收紧触发与排除边界",
"Add the first execution asset": "补上第一个执行资产",
"Promote from scaffold to production-ready": "从脚手架推进到生产可用",
"Borrow one proven pattern on purpose": "有选择地借鉴一个成熟模式",
"Harden portability semantics": "加固跨环境语义",
"Create an iteration evidence loop": "建立迭代证据回路",
"补齐世界证据": "补齐世界证据",
"The package needs clearer near-neighbor exclusions before it grows.": "在继续扩展前,需要先把相邻但不应触发的场景说清楚。",
"The package is still mostly prose. Add one asset that removes repeated manual work.": "当前包体仍偏文本说明,应先增加一个能减少重复人工操作的资产。",
"The first version exists; the next gain usually comes from adding the smallest useful gates.": "第一版已经存在,下一步收益通常来自补上最小但有效的质量门禁。",
"You already have public benchmark objects. The next gain is to choose one pattern intentionally instead of absorbing everything loosely.": "已经有公开 benchmark 对象,下一步应主动选择一个模式借鉴,而不是松散吸收所有做法。",
"The skill already signals reuse across environments, so contract clarity matters early.": "这个 Skill 已经面向跨环境复用,因此早期就需要把契约语义说清楚。",
"The package should show what changed and why after the first draft.": "第一版之后,包体应该能说明改了什么以及为什么改。",
"Add 3 to 5 should-trigger and should-not-trigger examples.": "增加 3 到 5 个应触发和不应触发的例子。",
"Refine the frontmatter description to name the recurring job and non-goals.": "精炼 frontmatter description,明确重复任务和非目标。",
"Run a first trigger evaluation pass before expanding the package.": "扩展包体前先跑一轮触发评估。",
"Move stable procedural guidance into references if users will need it repeatedly.": "如果用户会反复使用某段流程说明,把它沉淀到 references。",
"Create one deterministic helper script if a repeated step can be executed instead of described.": "如果某个重复步骤可以执行而不是描述,就沉淀成一个确定性 helper script。",
"Keep the main SKILL.md compact and route-oriented.": "保持主 SKILL.md 简洁,并围绕路由与入口组织。",
"Decide whether this skill is personal, team-reused, or library-grade.": "判断这个 Skill 是个人使用、团队复用,还是库级基础能力。",
"Add only the gates that match that risk level.": "只添加与风险等级匹配的质量门禁。",
"Record lifecycle metadata and review cadence once reuse becomes real.": "一旦进入真实复用,就记录生命周期元数据和评审节奏。",
"Decide whether to borrow method, structure, execution, or portability, but only one of them first.": "先判断要借鉴的是方法、结构、执行方式还是可迁移性,并且第一轮只借鉴其中一个。",
"Record what you will not borrow so the package stays light.": "记录本轮不借鉴的内容,避免包体过重。",
"Confirm activation mode, execution context, and trust assumptions.": "确认激活模式、执行上下文和信任假设。",
"Add or review degradation strategy for non-native targets.": "补充或复核非原生目标端的降级策略。",
"Package the skill once to verify adapter expectations.": "至少打包一次 Skill,用来验证 adapter 预期。",
"Generate the HTML skill report and keep it aligned with the package.": "生成 HTML Skill 报告,并保持它与包体内容一致。",
"Record reference scan choices and non-goals.": "记录参考扫描的取舍和非目标。",
"Capture the next iteration choice explicitly before adding more files.": "在继续增加文件前,明确记录下一轮迭代选择。",
"Cleaner routing and fewer accidental activations.": "路由更清晰,误触发更少。",
"Stronger execution quality without bloating the entrypoint.": "在不膨胀入口文件的前提下提升执行质量。",
"A clearer path from exploratory package to maintained asset.": "更清晰地从探索性包体走向可维护资产。",
"A cleaner package shape with less accidental over-design.": "包体形态更清晰,也减少偶然过度设计。",
"Safer cross-environment reuse with less target drift.": "跨环境复用更安全,目标漂移更少。",
"A clearer path for the next author or reviewer.": "让下一位作者或评审者更容易接手。",
"提交有效 intake packet,并让 ledger 通过 artifact SHA-256 校验。": "提交有效 intake packet,并让 ledger 通过 artifact SHA-256 校验。",
"全部外部/人工证据被 ledger 接受后,才能进入公开 world-class claim 复核。": "全部外部/人工证据被 ledger 接受后,才能进入公开 world-class claim 复核。",
}
TEXT_EN = {
"把一次性经验沉淀为可复用、可评估、可迁移的 Skill 包体。": "Turn one-off experience into a reusable, evaluable, and portable skill package.",
"Skill 作者、复用团队和后续 reviewer。": "Skill authors, reuse teams, and later reviewers.",
"创建完成后建议先打开 reports/skill-overview.html,再继续扩展包体。": "After creation, open reports/skill-overview.html before expanding the package further.",
"触发面保持精简,并锚定在 frontmatter description。": "The trigger surface stays lean and anchored in the frontmatter description.",
"已生成 Skill IR,核心语义可先于平台打包被审查和迁移。": "Skill IR is generated so core semantics can be reviewed and migrated before platform packaging.",
"已生成目标编译报告,可审查 IR 到 OpenAI、Claude、generic 等目标契约的映射。": "Target compilation evidence is generated to review how IR maps to OpenAI, Claude, generic, and other target contracts.",
"已生成 Output Eval Lab scorecard,可比较 with-skill 与 baseline 输出质量。": "Output Eval Lab scorecard is generated to compare with-skill and baseline output quality.",
"已生成 Output Execution Runs,可区分记录样本、命令执行和模型执行证据。": "Output Execution Runs is generated to distinguish recorded fixtures, command runs, and model-run evidence.",
"已生成 Output Review Adjudication,可记录盲评决策、一致率和待评审项。": "Output Review Adjudication is generated to record blind-review decisions, agreement rate, and pending cases.",
"已生成 Runtime Conformance Matrix,可审查目标端消费能力。": "Runtime Conformance Matrix is generated to review target-side consumption capability.",
"已生成 Security Trust Report,可审查脚本、依赖、secret 和包完整性风险。": "Security Trust Report is generated to review scripts, dependencies, secrets, and package-integrity risk.",
"已生成 Skill Atlas,可审查多 Skill 组合中的路由冲突、过期资产和 owner 缺口。": "Skill Atlas is generated to review route collisions, stale assets, and owner gaps across a skill library.",
"已生成 Registry Audit,可审查版本、owner、license、checksum 和目标兼容矩阵。": "Registry Audit is generated to review version, owner, license, checksum, and target compatibility metadata.",
"已生成 Install Simulation,可审查 zip 解压、入口加载、接口元数据和 adapter 可读性。": "Install Simulation is generated to review zip extraction, entrypoint loading, interface metadata, and adapter readability.",
"已生成 Adoption Drift Report,可把本地使用反馈转为下一轮迭代信号。": "Adoption Drift Report is generated to turn local usage feedback into next-iteration signals.",
"已生成 Review Waivers 台账,可记录 reviewer 对 warning 风险的批准、理由和到期时间。": "Review Waivers ledger is generated to record reviewer approval, rationale, scope, and expiry for accepted warning risk.",
"已生成 Review Annotations 台账,可把 reviewer 批注挂到 gate、文件和行号。": "Review Annotations ledger is generated to attach reviewer notes to gates, files, and line numbers.",
"已生成 Review Studio 2.0,可在一页中查看 blocker、warning、证据路径和发布闸门。": "Review Studio 2.0 is generated to inspect blockers, warnings, evidence paths, and release gates on one page.",
"已打包 agents/interface.yaml,便于后续做跨平台适配。": "Portable interface metadata is packaged for later adapter-based export.",
"长指导被拆到 references 中,入口文件可以保持轻量。": "Extended guidance is separated into references so the entrypoint can stay compact.",
"确定性辅助逻辑放在 scripts 中,而不是藏在提示词里。": "Deterministic helper logic lives in scripts instead of hidden prompt text.",
"包内包含可随 Skill 迁移的质量门禁或触发检查。": "The package includes portable quality gates or trigger checks.",
"这份报告用于快速理解新生成 Skill 的定位、原理、触发边界和交付内容。": "Use this report to quickly understand the generated skill's role, principles, trigger boundary, and deliverables.",
"先确认重复任务、真实输入形态和可交付输出,再决定是否继续加 references、scripts 或 evals。": "Clarify the recurring job, real input shape, and deliverable output before adding references, scripts, or evals.",
"如果需求仍然模糊,优先回到 intent dialogue 收紧边界,再扩展包体结构。": "If the request is still fuzzy, tighten the boundary through intent dialogue before expanding the package.",
"尚未生成盲评审定报告。": "The blind review adjudication report has not been generated yet.",
"尚未生成输出执行证据报告。": "The output execution evidence report has not been generated yet.",
"先记录 reviewer 对 A/B 的选择,再打开答案 key 计算一致率。": "Record the reviewer's A/B choice before opening the answer key and calculating agreement.",
"缺少真实 reviewer 决策时只显示待评审,不伪造人工结论。": "When real reviewer decisions are missing, show pending status instead of fabricating human conclusions.",
"recorded fixture 只能证明可复现样本,不等同于模型执行。": "A recorded fixture proves reproducible samples only; it is not model execution.",
"只有 provider runner 返回 model metadata 时才计入 model-executed。": "Only provider runners that return model metadata count as model-executed.",
"SKILL.md 已存在,是 Skill 的入口。": "SKILL.md exists and acts as the skill entrypoint.",
"README.md 已存在,便于人工阅读。": "README.md exists for human-readable usage.",
"agents/interface.yaml 已存在,便于跨平台适配。": "agents/interface.yaml exists for cross-platform adaptation.",
"manifest.json 已存在,生命周期信息可追踪。": "manifest.json exists so lifecycle metadata is traceable.",
"reports/ 已存在,生成证据可以随包体迁移。": "reports/ exists so generated evidence can travel with the package.",
"references/ 已存在,长指导可以从入口文件拆出。": "references/ exists so long guidance can stay out of the entrypoint.",
"scripts/ 已存在,确定性逻辑有位置承载。": "scripts/ exists to hold deterministic logic.",
"evals/ 已存在,触发或质量检查可以随包体迁移。": "evals/ exists so trigger or quality checks can travel with the package.",
"frontmatter description 已存在,具备基础路由面。": "The frontmatter description exists, giving the skill a basic routing surface.",
"description 有足够长度说明任务边界。": "The description is long enough to explain the task boundary.",
"description 已包含使用场景或排除边界信号。": "The description includes usage-scenario or exclusion-boundary signals.",
"description 证据不足,触发边界不稳定。": "Description evidence is insufficient, so the trigger boundary is unstable.",
"description 偏短,建议补充输入、输出或非目标。": "The description is short; add inputs, outputs, or non-goals.",
"description 缺少明确使用场景或排除边界。": "The description lacks clear usage scenarios or exclusion boundaries.",
"evals/ 已存在,可承载触发样例或质量检查。": "evals/ exists and can hold trigger examples or quality checks.",
"evals/ 证据不足,误触发检查仍偏弱。": "evals/ evidence is insufficient, so accidental-trigger checks remain weak.",
"intent-confidence 报告已生成,可辅助判断触发稳定性。": "The intent-confidence report exists and helps judge trigger stability.",
"intent-confidence 证据不足。": "intent-confidence evidence is insufficient.",
"入口文件保持克制,可维护性较好。": "The entrypoint stays restrained, which supports maintainability.",
"入口文件偏长,建议继续拆到 references/。": "The entrypoint is long; continue splitting durable guidance into references/.",
"references/ 已承载扩展指导。": "references/ carries extended guidance.",
"references/ 证据不足,长指导可能堆在入口。": "references/ evidence is insufficient; long guidance may still be crowded into the entrypoint.",
"scripts/ 已承载确定性逻辑。": "scripts/ carries deterministic logic.",
"scripts/ 证据不足,重复执行逻辑可能仍靠人工。": "scripts/ evidence is insufficient; repeated execution may still rely on manual work.",
"evals/ 已承载可迁移检查。": "evals/ carries portable checks.",
"agents/interface.yaml 已存在。": "agents/interface.yaml exists.",
"manifest.json 已存在。": "manifest.json exists.",
"目标平台或 adapter target 已声明。": "Target platforms or adapter targets are declared.",
"目标平台证据不足。": "Target-platform evidence is insufficient.",
"入口文件未发现明显私有绝对路径。": "No obvious private absolute paths were found in the entrypoint.",
"入口文件含私有绝对路径,迁移风险较高。": "The entrypoint contains private absolute paths, increasing portability risk.",
"分数越高代表上下文成本越低。": "A higher score means lower context cost.",
"上下文成本处于可控区间。": "Context cost is within a controlled range.",
"上下文成本偏高,建议压缩入口或拆分 references。": "Context cost is high; compress the entrypoint or split references further.",
"手动触发 + description 路由": "Manual activation plus description-based routing",
"跨平台": "Cross-platform",
"本地复用": "Local reuse",
"输入材料": "Input material",
"用户提供的工作流、提示词、文档、记录或散乱笔记": "User-provided workflows, prompts, documents, records, or rough notes.",
"期望沉淀的复用场景、排除项、约束和质量标准": "The reusable scenario, exclusions, constraints, and quality standards to capture.",
"Skill 包体": "Skill package",
"可路由的 SKILL.md": "A routeable SKILL.md.",
"agents/interface.yaml 元数据": "agents/interface.yaml metadata.",
"必要的 references、scripts、evals、reports 证据": "Necessary references, scripts, evals, and reports evidence.",
"可复用能力": "Reusable capability",
"入口层": "Entrypoint layer",
"参考层": "Reference layer",
"脚本层": "Script layer",
"评估层": "Evaluation layer",
"报告层": "Report layer",
"评分雷达": "Rating Radar",
"交付流程": "Delivery Flow",
"能力矩阵": "Capability Matrix",
"分层结构": "Layered Structure",
"风险热力": "Risk Heatmap",
"资产分布": "Asset Distribution",
"迭代时间": "Iteration Timeline",
"执行确定性": "Execution certainty",
"知识密度": "Knowledge density",
"发生概率": "Probability",
"影响程度": "Impact",
"评分雷达展示结构完整度、触发边界、证据、维护和迁移的相对强弱。": "The radar chart compares completeness, trigger clarity, evidence, maintainability, and portability.",
"交付流程把用户输入、生成的包体和可复用能力放在一条线上。": "The delivery flow places user input, generated package, and reusable capability on one path.",
"能力矩阵说明这个 Skill 更偏知识密集还是执行确定。": "The capability matrix shows whether the skill leans toward knowledge density or execution certainty.",
"分层结构展示入口、参考、脚本、评估和报告如何各司其职。": "The layered structure shows how entrypoint, references, scripts, evals, and reports each carry a distinct role.",
"风险热力图用影响程度和发生概率标出当前治理重点。": "The risk heatmap marks governance priorities by impact and probability.",
"资产分布图展示当前包体的文件和目录重心。": "The asset distribution chart shows where files and directories are concentrated.",
"迭代时间线把下一步升级收束成少数可执行动作。": "The iteration timeline narrows the next upgrade into a few executable moves.",
"只需要一次性回答、没有复用价值的临时请求。": "One-off requests that do not need reusable skill behavior.",
"要求直接执行相邻任务,而不是沉淀或使用这个 Skill。": "Requests to perform an adjacent task directly rather than create or use this skill.",
"缺少必要事实且用户不允许澄清的场景。": "Cases that lack required facts and do not allow clarification.",
"相邻任务需要先确认是否应转为独立 Skill。": "Adjacent tasks should first be checked for whether they need a separate skill.",
"不替代人工事实核查,也不静默扩大职责。": "Does not replace human fact checking or silently expand responsibility.",
"先改触发边界,再扩展工作流。": "Tighten trigger boundaries before expanding the workflow.",
"只把重复且稳定的步骤沉淀为脚本。": "Turn only repeated and stable steps into scripts.",
"每次升级后重新生成报告并检查分数原因。": "Regenerate the report after each upgrade and inspect score reasons.",
"先补证据和边界,再增加包体复杂度。": "Improve evidence and boundaries before adding package complexity.",
"补齐世界证据": "Close world-class evidence",
"提交有效 intake packet,并让 ledger 通过 artifact SHA-256 校验。": "Submit valid intake packets and let the ledger verify artifact SHA-256 digests.",
"全部外部/人工证据被 ledger 接受后,才能进入公开 world-class claim 复核。": "Only after the ledger accepts all external and human evidence should the public world-class claim move to review.",
"缺少真实 provider 模型运行和 token metadata。": "Missing a real provider model run and token metadata.",
"盲评 pair 仍待真实 reviewer 决策。": "Blind-review pairs still need real reviewer decisions.",
"原生 runtime enforcement 仍待目标客户端或外部安装器证明。": "Native runtime enforcement still needs target-client or external-installer proof.",
"真实外部客户端 metadata-only 事件仍未导入。": "Real external-client metadata-only events have not been imported yet.",
}
MODE_ZH = {
"scaffold": "脚手架",
"production": "生产",
"library": "库级",
"governed": "治理",
"manual": "手动",
"inline": "内联",
"agent-skills": "Agent Skills",
}
PACKAGE_LABEL_ZH = {
"SKILL.md": "Skill 入口文件",
"README.md": "人类可读使用说明",
"agents/interface.yaml": "跨平台接口元数据",
"manifest.json": "生命周期与打包元数据",
"references": "扩展指导与复用资料",
"scripts": "确定性脚本或本地工具",
"evals": "触发与质量检查",
"reports": "生成的证据与总结报告",
}
KIND_ZH = {"file": "文件", "folder": "目录"}
LABEL_EN = {
"强项": "Strength",
"缺口": "Gap",
"保留并复用": "Keep",
"纳入下一轮修复": "Fix next",
"误触发风险": "Trigger risk",
"输出漂移风险": "Output drift risk",
"证据不足风险": "Evidence gap risk",
"包体膨胀风险": "Package bloat risk",
"跨平台迁移风险": "Portability risk",
}
METRIC_LABEL_EN = {
"完整度": "Completeness",
"触发清晰": "Trigger clarity",
"证据充分": "Evidence depth",
"可维护性": "Maintainability",
"可迁移性": "Portability",
"上下文成本": "Context cost",
}
WORLD_CLASS_LABEL_EN = {
"提供商留出": "provider holdout",
"人工盲评": "human adjudication",
"原生权限": "native permission",
"原生遥测": "native telemetry",
}
def contains_cjk(text: str) -> bool:
return any("\u4e00" <= char <= "\u9fff" for char in str(text))
def zh_for(text: str) -> str:
value = str(text).strip()
if not value:
return ""
if value in TEXT_ZH:
return TEXT_ZH[value]
if value in TEXT_EN or contains_cjk(value):
return value
if value.startswith("Use this skill when the request matches:"):
return "当用户请求与该 Skill 的触发描述匹配时使用。"
if value.startswith("用户说出类似需求时:"):
return "当用户提出与该 Skill 触发描述相近的请求时使用。"
if value.startswith("Use $") and " when you need to " in value:
skill, need = value.removeprefix("Use ").split(" when you need to ", 1)
return f"当你需要{zh_for(need).rstrip('。')}时使用 `{skill}`。"
if value.startswith("Read the strongest pattern from "):
repo = value.removeprefix("Read the strongest pattern from ").rstrip(".")
return f"阅读 `{repo}` 中最值得借鉴的模式。"
if value.startswith("Primary prompt task family:"):
return "主要提示任务类型已记录在 prompt quality profile 中。"
if value.startswith("Complexity:"):
return "复杂度判断已记录在 prompt quality profile 中。"
if value.startswith("Stability:"):
return "系统稳定性评分已记录在 system model 中。"
if value.startswith("Owned job:"):
return "负责的核心任务已在 system model 中说明。"
if value.startswith("Leverage:"):
return "关键杠杆点已在 system model 中说明。"
return "原始说明可切换到英文查看;默认中文报告保留结论与结构说明。"
def en_for(text: str) -> str:
value = str(text).strip()
if not value:
return ""
if value in TEXT_EN:
return TEXT_EN[value]
if value in METRIC_LABEL_EN:
return METRIC_LABEL_EN[value]
if value.startswith("创建完成后建议先打开 ") and value.endswith(",再继续扩展包体。"):
path = value.removeprefix("创建完成后建议先打开 ").removesuffix(",再继续扩展包体。")
return f"After creation, open {path} before expanding the package further."
if value.startswith("交付结果:"):
return "Deliverables: " + value.removeprefix("交付结果:")
if value.startswith("能力类型:"):
return "Capability type: " + value.removeprefix("能力类型:")
if value.startswith("成熟度:"):
return "Maturity: " + value.removeprefix("成熟度:")
if value.startswith("触发强度:"):
return "Trigger strength: " + en_for(value.removeprefix("触发强度:"))
if value.startswith("复用范围:"):
return "Reuse scope: " + en_for(value.removeprefix("复用范围:"))
if value.startswith("评审进度:"):
return "Review progress: " + value.removeprefix("评审进度:")
if value.startswith("待评审:"):
return "Pending review: " + value.removeprefix("待评审:")
if value.startswith("一致率:"):
tail = value.removeprefix("一致率:")
return "Agreement rate: " + ("not available yet" if tail == "暂无" else tail)
if value.startswith("非法决策:"):
return "Invalid decisions: " + value.removeprefix("非法决策:")
if value.startswith("变体运行:"):
return "Variant runs: " + value.removeprefix("变体运行:")
if value.startswith("模型执行:"):
return "Model executions: " + value.removeprefix("模型执行:")
if value.startswith("记录样本:"):
return "Recorded fixtures: " + value.removeprefix("记录样本:")
if value.startswith("Token 估算:"):
return "Token estimates: " + value.removeprefix("Token 估算:")
match = re.match(r"^世界级证据仍有\s+(\d+)\s+项待补;公开完成态 claim 必须继续保持阻塞。$", value)
if match:
return f"World-class evidence still has {match.group(1)} pending item(s); public completion claims must stay blocked."
match = re.match(r"^补齐(.+?)证据:(.+)$", value)
if match:
label = WORLD_CLASS_LABEL_EN.get(match.group(1), match.group(1))
return f"Close {label} evidence: {en_for(match.group(2))}"
match = re.match(r"^继续补齐剩余\s+(\d+)\s+项外部/人工证据,并保持 claim guard 为 pending 状态。$", value)
if match:
return f"Close the remaining {match.group(1)} external or human evidence item(s) and keep the claim guard pending."
match = re.match(
r"^按 ledger 总量继续补齐\s+(\d+)\s+项待补证据(外部\s+(\d+)\s+项、人工\s+(\d+)\s+项;未展开\s+(\d+)\s+项),并保持 claim guard 为 pending 状态。$",
value,
)
if match:
return (
f"Close all {match.group(1)} pending evidence item(s) in the ledger "
f"(external {match.group(2)}, human {match.group(3)}; {match.group(4)} not shown here) "
"and keep the claim guard pending."
)
match = re.match(r"^已生成\s+(\d+)\s+/\s+(\d+)\s+类报告证据。$", value)
if match:
return f"Generated {match.group(1)} / {match.group(2)} evidence report types."
match = re.match(r"^(.+?)\s+已存在。$", value)
if match:
return f"{match.group(1)} exists."
match = re.match(r"^(.+?)\s+未发现或为空,完整度扣分。$", value)
if match:
return f"{match.group(1)} was not found or is empty, reducing completeness."
match = re.match(r"^(.+?)\s+证据不足。$", value)
if match:
return f"{match.group(1)} evidence is insufficient."
match = re.match(r"^SKILL\.md 约\s+(.+?)\s+个词/字。$", value)
if match:
return f"SKILL.md is about {match.group(1)} words/characters."
match = re.match(r"^入口约\s+(.+?)\s+个词/字,references 约\s+(.+?)\s+个词/字。$", value)
if match:
return f"Entrypoint is about {match.group(1)} words/characters; references are about {match.group(2)}."
match = re.match(r"^结构化 Skill 目录,共\s+(.+?)\s+类关键资产。$", value)
if match:
return f"Structured skill directory with {match.group(1)} key asset groups."
if value.startswith("证据不足:缺少 "):
return "Evidence gap: missing " + value.removeprefix("证据不足:缺少 ").rstrip("。") + "."
for metric_label in METRIC_LABEL_EN:
prefix = metric_label + "需要补强:"
if value.startswith(prefix):
return f"{METRIC_LABEL_EN[metric_label]} needs improvement: {en_for(value.removeprefix(prefix))}"
if value.startswith("Use this skill when the request matches:"):
return "Use this skill when the request matches the frontmatter description."
if value.startswith("用户说出类似需求时:"):
return "Use this skill when the user asks for a matching scenario."
if value.startswith("当你需要") and "时使用" in value:
return "Use this skill when the request matches its stated scenario."
if contains_cjk(value):
return "Skill-specific source text is authored in Chinese; switch to Simplified Chinese for the exact wording."
return value
def bi_span(zh: str, en: str | None = None) -> str:
english = en_for(en) if en is not None else en_for(zh)
return (
f'<span data-lang="zh-CN">{html.escape(str(zh))}</span>'
f'<span data-lang="en">{html.escape(str(english))}</span>'
)
def bi_item(text: str) -> str:
return bi_span(zh_for(text), en_for(text))
def mode_zh(value: str) -> str:
return MODE_ZH.get(str(value), str(value))
def readable_description_zh(description: str) -> str:
if contains_cjk(description):
return description
return "该 Skill 的触发描述来自 SKILL.md frontmatter;默认中文报告先呈现能力边界,原始英文描述可切换到英文查看。"