# Human Review Template

Use this template when a description candidate is ready for human review after automated gates have run.

## Review Header

- target:
- review date:
- reviewer:
- current description:
- candidate description:
- promotion decision:

## What Changed

- what was the intended improvement?
- what route boundary is now clearer?
- what family or holdout behavior improved?

## Automated Evidence

- visible holdout result:
- blind holdout result:
- judge-backed blind result:
- adversarial result:
- route confusion result:
- calibration / risk band:

## Boundary Questions

- does the candidate trigger only when a reusable skill package is actually needed?
- does it avoid one-off explanation, translation, or summary-only requests?
- does it avoid stealing sibling routes?
- does it stay short enough for the target maturity tier?

## Authoring Discipline

- are unresolved assumptions named or clarified before deepening the package?
- is the package no larger than the real recurring job requires?
- do changed files trace directly to the requested improvement?
- did the author avoid speculative features, decorative folders, and generic configuration?
- does each new artifact have a verification reason?

## Decision

- approve promotion
- keep current
- block candidate

## Notes

- rationale:
- follow-up actions:
- next review trigger:
